Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Support Among Latina Immigrant Women: Bridge Persons as Mediators of Cervical Cancer Screening

  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New Latina immigrants face numerous linguistic, cultural, logistical, and material barriers to cervical cancer screenings. Promotoras (lay health advisors) are a proven strategy to promote utilization of care. Since the mid-1990s, interventions in North Carolina have aimed to connect Latina immigrants to a broader range of bridge persons. This study assessed the effect of bridge persons on utilization of cervical cancer screening by Latina immigrants in North Carolina. Women were recruited in Spanish-language churches in four counties (N = 223). Logistic regression results show that persons known through advocacy organizations appeared to increase probability of recent Pap screening by an average of 10.4 percentage points (p < 0.05).Promotoras remain more effective, increasing probability of screening by 12.9 percentage points (p < 0.05) but few women (14%) knew one. No association was found with other bridge person profiles. Interventions are needed to better engage all bridge persons in linking immigrants to preventive health services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iglesias E, Robertson E, Johansson SE, Engfeldt P, Sundquist J: Women, international migration and self-reported health. A population-based study of women of reproductive age. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56:111–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US Census Bureau: Census 2000: Hispanics in the U.S.A.; 2001. Accessed at http://www.census.gov/mso/www/rsf/hisorig/

  3. Clark W, Patel S: Residential choices of the newly arrived foreign-born: Spatial patterns and the implications for assimilation. Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Boston, MA; 2004

  4. Chiu M: Ethnicity, immigration, and migration to nontraditional geographic areas. Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Boston, MA; 2004

  5. Kandel W, Cromartie J: Outside city limits, inside county lines: Rural metro hispanics. Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Boston, MA; 2004

  6. O'Brien K, Cokkinides V, Jemal A, Cardinez CJ, Murray T, Samuels A, Ward E, Thun MJ: Cancer Statistics for Hispanics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003:208–226

  7. Hubbell FA, Chavez LR, Mishra SI, Valdez RB: Beliefs about sexual behavior and other predictors of Papanicolaou smear screening among Latinas and Anglo women. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:2353–2358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scarinci IC, Beech BM, Kovach KW, Bailey TL: An examination of sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among low-income Latina immigrants of reproductive age. J Immigr Health 2003; 5:119–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seeff LC, McKenna MT: Cervical cancer mortality among foreign-born women living in the United States, 1985 to 1996. Cancer Detect Prev 2003; 27:203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Cancer Institute: Human Papillomaviruses and Cancer; 2004, available at http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/3_20.htm

  11. Cerrutti M, Massey DS: On the auspices of female migration from Mexico to the United States. Demography 2001; 38:187–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawson MT, Gifford SM: Narratives, culture and sexual health: Personal life experiences of Salvadorean and Chilean women living in Melbourne, Australia. Health 2001; 5:403–423

    Google Scholar 

  13. CDC: DATA 2010: The Healthy People 2010 database; 2004, available at http://wonder.cdc.gov/data2010/

  14. CDC: DATA 2010: The Healthy People 2010 database; 2001, available at http://wonder.cdc.gov/data2010/

  15. Rogler LH: International migrations. A framework for directing research. Am Psychol 1994; 49:701–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bender DE, Rivera T, Madonna D: Rural origin as a risk factor for maternal and child health in periurban Bolivia. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37:1345–1349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bender DE, Castro D, O'Donnell K: Family stories, family strengths, and family needs. Portraits and stories by Latina women, residents of Piedmont North Carolina. Insight Out; 1999

  18. Cohen S, Syme S: Social Support and Health. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1985

    Google Scholar 

  19. Landale NS, Oropesa RS: Migration, social support and perinatal health: An origin-destination analysis of Puerto Rican women. J Health Soc Behav 2001; 42:166–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berkman LF, Syme SL: Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 109:186–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Suarez L, Ramirez AG, Villarreal R, Marti J, McAlister A, Talavera GA, Trapido E, Perez-Stable EJ: Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic groups. Am J Prev Med 2000; 19:47–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang SH, Bloom JR, Romano PS: Cancer screening among African-American women: Their use of tests and social support. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:101–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berkman LF: Assessing the physical health effects of social networks and social support. Annu Rev Public Health 1984; 5:413–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eng E: The Save our Sisters Project. A social network strategy for reaching rural black women. Cancer 1993; 72:1071–1077

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Earp JA, Viadro CI, Vincus AA, Altpeter M, Flax V, Mayne L, Eng E: Lay health advisors: A strategy for getting the word out about breast cancer. Health Educ Behav 1997; 24:432–451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schiauvone A: Coordinator of promotora trainings, El Centro Hispano, Durham, NC. Personal communication: The cost of training and retaining promotoras; April 13, 2004

  27. Granovetter M: The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 1973; 78:1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pescosolido BA: Migration, medical-care preferences and the lay referral system—a network theory of role assimilation. Am Sociol Rev 1986; 51:523–540

    Google Scholar 

  29. US Census Bureau: Census 2000, Summary File 4; 2000

  30. Current K: Director, El Centro Latino. Personal communication: History of advocacy organizations in North Carolina; September 10, 1999

  31. Parra I: Director, El Centro Hispano. Personal communication: History of advocacy organizations in North Carolina; October 6, 1999

  32. Wasserman M, Bender D, Kalsbeek W, Suchindran C, Mouw T: A church-based sampling frame for research with Latina immigrant women. Popul Res Policy Rev 2006; 25(2) (in press)

  33. Massey DS: The Ethnosurvey in theory and practice. Int Migration Rev 1987; 21:1498–1522

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Donato K: Migration and Health Survey. Houston, TX: Rice University; 2000

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang C, Burris MA: Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Educ Q 1994; 21:171–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bender DE, Castro D, O'Donnell K: Explaining the birth weight paradox: Latina immigrants' perceptions of resilience and risk. J Immigrant Health 2000; 2:155–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Marin G, Marin B: Research with Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991

    Google Scholar 

  38. Aday LA, Chiu GY, Andersen R: Methodological issues in health care surveys of the Spanish heritage population. Am J Public Health 1980; 70:367–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Aponte L, Torres Y: Latino Cultural Values and Access to Health Care. Presentation of La Charla: Spanish for Health Profession's Students. Chapel Hill, NC; October 26, 1999

  40. Massey DS, Zenteno R: A validation of the Ethnosurvey: The case of Mexico–U.S. migration. Int Migration Rev 2000; 34:766

    Google Scholar 

  41. Massey DS: When surveys fail: An alternative for data collection. In: al Se, ed. The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:145–160

    Google Scholar 

  42. Harper D: On the authority of the image: Visual methods at the crossroads. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:403–412

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bateson G, Mead M: Balinese Character, a Photographic Analysis. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences; 1942

    Google Scholar 

  44. Steckler A, McLeroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, McCormick L: Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Educ Q 1992; 19:1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bender DE, Baker R, Dusch E, McCann MF: Integrated use of qualitative and quantitative methods to elicit women's differential knowledge of breastfeeding and lactational amenorrhea in periurban Bolivia. J Health Popul Dev Ctries 1997; 1:68–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Cook T, Reichardt C: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1979

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, Moscicki AB, Smith RA, Eyre HJ, Cohen C; American Cancer Society: American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52:342–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lin N: Social Capital Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 2001

    Google Scholar 

  49. Marin G, Sabogal F, Van Oss Marin B, Otero-Sabogal R, Perez-Stable EJ: Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hispanic J Behav Sci 1987; 9:183–205

    Google Scholar 

  50. Norton EC: Analysis of Categorical Data. Course pack. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina; 2000

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mofidi M, Rozier RG, King RS: Problems with access to dental care for Medicaid-insured children: What caregivers think. Am J Public Health 2002; 92:53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie R. Wasserman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wasserman, M.R., Bender, D.E., Lee, SY. et al. Social Support Among Latina Immigrant Women: Bridge Persons as Mediators of Cervical Cancer Screening. J Immigrant Health 8, 67–84 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-006-6343-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-006-6343-0

Key Words

Navigation