Skip to main content
Log in

Welfare and Immigration Reform and Use of Prenatal Care Among Women of Mexican Ethnicity in San Diego, California

  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foreign-born women and, in particular, Hispanic foreign-born women, are less likely to have insurance, are less likely to have insurance that covers prenatal care, and are less likely to utilize prenatal care compared with US-born Hispanic women. Significant concern has been raised regarding the ability of immigrant women to access prenatal care services because of severe restrictions imposed on immigrants’ eligibility for Medicaid-funded services following the passage in 1996 of the federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reform Act (PRWORA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA). We conducted an interview-based study of prenatal care utilization with women of Mexican ethnicity and diverse immigration statuses in San Diego County, California. Our findings indicate that, despite increased levels of fear associated with recent immigration and with undocumented status, there were no statistically significant differences across immigration statuses in length of time to receipt of medical care for gynecological events and for prenatal care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Currie J, Grogger J. Medicaid expansions and welfare contractions: Offsetting effects on prenatal care and infant health? J Health Econ 202; 21:313–335

  2. Rosen MG. Caring for Our Future, The Content of Prenatal Care: A report of the Public Health Service Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1989

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kotelchuck M. The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: Its US distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health 2004; 84:1486–1489

    Google Scholar 

  4. Albrecht SL, Miller MK. Hispanic subgroup differences in prenatal care. Soc Biol 1996; 43:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moore P, Hepworth JT. Use of prenatal and infant health services by Mexican-American Medicaid enrollees. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 272:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thamer M, Richard C, Casebeer CW, Ray NF. Health insurance coverage among foreign-born U.S. residents: Impact of race, ethnicity and length of residence. Am J Public Health 1997; 87:96–122

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thamer M, Rinehart C. Public and private health insurance of US foreign-born residents: Implications of the 1996 welfare reform law. Ethnic Health 1998; 3:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  8. United States Commission on Immigration Reform. Impact of Federal Welfare Reform on Immigrants. Final Report. July 28; 1997

  9. Moore JD, Jr. Hospitals wake up to welfare reform impact. Mod Healthcare, Aug. 16, 1996; 20

  10. Sardell A. Child health policy in the U.S.: The paradox of consensus. J Health Polit Policy Law 1990; 15:271–304

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes DC, Runyan SJ. Prenatal care and public policy: Lessons for promoting women’s health. J Am Med Women’s Assoc 1995; 50:156–163

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tanenbaum SJ. Medicaid eligibility policy in the 1980s: Medical utilitarianism and the “Deserving” Poor. J Health Polit Policy Law 1995; 20:933–954

    Google Scholar 

  13. California Department of Health Services. Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization—California 1989–1994. Mortality Morbidity Weekly Report 1996; 45:655

  14. Ziv A, Talo B. Denial of care to illegal immigrants. New Engl J Med 1995; 332:1095–1098

    Google Scholar 

  15. Palinkas LA, Arciniega JL. Immigration reform and the health of Latino immigrants in California. J Immigrant Health 1999; 1:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  16. California State Auditor. Department of Health Services. Use of Its Port of Entry Fraud Detection Program Is No Longer Justified. Sacramento, California: California Bureau of State Audits, 1999

  17. Wiles MH, Wright DF, Parks M, Clayton J. Abuse by officials at the border. Los Angeles Times, Dec. 23, 1997; B6 (editorial)

  18. Schlosberg C, Wiley D. The Impact of INS Public Charge Determinations on Immigrant Access to Health Care. Washington, DC: National Health Law Program and National Immigration Law Center, May 1998. Available at http://healthlaw.org/pubs/19980522publiccharge.html. Last accessed April 25, 2002

  19. Berk ML, Schur CL, Chavez LR, Frankel M. Health care use among undocumented Latino immigrants. Health Affairs 2000; 19:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  20. Court rejects key provisions of California’s Proposition 187, New York Times, Nov. 9, 1995, p. A16

  21. California Coalition for Immigration Reform. History of Proposition 187. Available at http://ccir.net/REFERENCE/187-History.htnil. Last accessed May 27, 2004

  22. Kurzban IJ. Immigration Law Sourcebook, 9th edn. Washington, DC: American Immigration Law Foundation

  23. Joyce T, Bauer T, Minkoff H, Kaestner R. Welfare reform and the perinatal health and health care use of Latino women in California, New York City, and Texas. Am J Public Health 2001; 91:1857–1864

    Google Scholar 

  24. California Department of Health Services Medical Care Statistics Section. Medi-Cal Funded Deliveries, 1995. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services Medical Care Statistics Section; 1997

  25. Kuiper H, Richwald GA, Rotblatt H, Asch S. The communicable disease impact of eliminating publicly funded prenatal care for undocumented immigrants. Matern Child Health J 1999; 3:39–52

    Google Scholar 

  26. Doe v. Wilson, No. C97–2427 SI (N.D. Cal. 1998)

  27. Doe v. Belshe, 1998 Cal. LEXIS 1471 (1998)

  28. California Senate Office of Research. Federal Welfare Changes Affecting California’s Immigrants. Sacramento, California: California Senate Office of Research; 1996

  29. Sun-Hee Park L, Sarnoff R, Bender C, Korenbrot C. Impact of recent welfare and immigration reform on use of Medicaid for prenatal care by immigrants in California. Journal of Immigrant Health 2000; 2:5–22

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matin G, Gamba RJ. A new measurement of acculturation for Hispanics: The Bidimensional Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (BAS). Hispanic J Behav Sci 1996; 18:297-316

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loue S, Foerstel J. Assessing immigration status and eligibility for publicly funded medical care: A questionnaire for public health professionals. Am J Public Health 1996; 86:1623–1625

    Google Scholar 

  32. Loue S. Defining the immigrant. In S. Loue, ed. Handbook of Immigrant Health. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  33. Asch S, Leake B, Abderson R, Gelberg L. Why do symptomatic patients delay obtaining care for tuberculosis? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1244–1248

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marx JL, Thach AB, Grayson G, Lowry LP, Lopez PF, Lee PP. The effects of California Proposition 187 on ophthalmology clinic utilization at an inner-city urban hospital. Ophthalmology 1996; 103:847–851

    Google Scholar 

  35. Loue S, Faust M, Bunce A. The effect of immigration and welfare reform legislation on immigrants’ access to health care, Cuyahoga and Lorain Counties. J Immigrant Health 2000; 2:23–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sana Loue PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loue, S., Cooper, M. & Lloyd, L.S. Welfare and Immigration Reform and Use of Prenatal Care Among Women of Mexican Ethnicity in San Diego, California. J Immigrant Health 7, 37–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-005-1389-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-005-1389-6

KEY WORDS

Navigation