Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socio-Economic Inequality of Wellbeing: A Comparison of Switzerland and South Africa

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study seeks answers to the broader question on the income-wellbeing nexus through a seldom utilised technique of concentration index to measure income related wellbeing inequality. The analysis is undertaken in the vastly differing income and income inequality contexts of Switzerland and South Africa to contrast the relationships in different scenarios over a 10-year period. The study brings forth the findings that wellbeing is concentrated among the higher end of the income distribution in both countries but that the level of wellbeing concentration is lower in Switzerland as compared to South Africa. The Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition of the Erreygers-corrected concentration index indicates that the differences in the wellbeing concentration levels of the two countries are due to both the difference in the levels of income as well as the differences in the marginal utility of income in the two countries. Results indicate that South Africa’s pro-rich concentration of wellbeing would decrease substantially with Swiss endowments. On the other hand, income based concentration of wellbeing would increase in South Africa with Swiss coefficients. The differences in the coefficients of absolute and relative income, contribute more to the differences in wellbeing concentration in the two countries than the levels of these variables. This indicates that the level of income and relative income is important in understanding the impact of these variables on wellbeing inequality. Further, the decomposition analysis of the concentration index for each country to understand the relative importance of variables indicates that while relative income is a significant driver of wellbeing inequality in South Africa and Switzerland, its importance is lower than absolute income in determining the concentration of wellbeing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Regulated by the Swiss Federal Law on  Health Insurance and implemented at canton-level within a highly decentralized regulatory framework, healthcare system in Switzerland is one of the best in the world (De Pietro et al. 2015). Although there are no free state-provided health services, private health insurance (which is subsidised for low-income) is mandatory for all.

References

  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonge, O., & Peters, D. H. (2015). Utility and limitations of measures of health inequities: A theoretical perspective. Global Health work Action, 8(1), 27591. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., Massariy, R., & Naticchioniz, P. (2014). The drivers of happiness inequality: Suggestions for promoting social cohesion. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(2), 419–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, T., Branson, N., Daniels, R. C., Leibbrandt, M., Mlatsheni, C., & Woolard, I. (2018). National income dynamics study panel user manual. Cape Town: South African Labour Development Research Unit (SALDRU).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Fleche, S., & Senik, C. (2012). The great happiness moderation. Paris: Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 65, 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pietro, C., Camanzind, P., Sturny, I., Crivelli, I., Edwards-Garavoglia, S., Spranger, A., et al. (2015). Switzerland: Health systems review. Health Systems in Transition, 17(4), 1–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J., & Kohler, U. (2011). Is happiness inequality immune to income inequality? New evidence through instrument-effect-corrected standard deviations. Social Science Research, 40(3), 742–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., & MacCulloch, R. (2010). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(3), 834–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, I., & Foster, J. (2013). Inequality of happiness in the US: 1972–2010. Review of Income and Wealth, 59(3), 393–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynan, K. E., & Ravina, E. (2007). Increasing income inequality, external habits and self-reported happiness. American Economic Review, 97(2), 226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz. London, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erreygers, G. (2009). Correcting the concentration index. Journal of Health Economics, 28(2), 504–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and wellbeing: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandelman, N., & Porzecanski, R. (2013). Happiness inequality: How much is reasonable? Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, W., & Smyth, R. (2010). Job satisfaction and relative income in economic transition: Status or signal? The Case of Urban China. China Economic Review, 21(3), 442–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo-Almorox, E., & Garrido, R. M. (2016). Decomposing socio-economic inequalities in leisure-time physical inactivity: The case of Spanish children. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15, 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (2013). The endowment-contrast model: A lens for happiness research. In I. Boniwell, S. A. David, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0004.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective wellbeing. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. (2004). The social context of wellbeing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 359, 1435–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, T., & Gruen, C. (2007). What is the structure of South African happiness equations? Evidence from quality of life surveys. Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 311–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 544–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N. (1980). Income inequality and poverty: Methods of estimation and policy application. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollamparambil, U. (2019). Happiness, happiness inequality and income dynamics in South Africa. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00075-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollamparambil, U., & Razak, A. (2016). Trends in gender wage gap and discrimination in South Africa: A comparative analysis across races. Indian Journal of Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703016636446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koolman, X., & van Doorslaer, D. (2004). On the interpretation of a concentration index of inequality. Health Economics, 13, 649–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (2000). Diminishing returns to income, companionship—And happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibbrandt, M., Finn, A., & Woolard, I. (2012). Describing and decomposing post-apartheid income inequality in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 29(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2012.645639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you. Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the ‘‘objective good’’. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeboom, M., & Van Doorslaer, E. (2004). Cut-point shift and index shift in self-reported health. Journal of Health Economics, 23(6), 1083–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, V. (1998). Quality of life in South Africa: Post-apartheid trends. Social Indicators Research, 43(1/2), 27–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, V. (2007). Satisfied and dissatisfied South Africans: Results from the general household survey in international comparison. Social Indicators Research, 81, 389–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, K., & Kollamparambil, U. (2016). The impact of rural-urban migration on subjective wellbeing in South Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(9), 1357–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1171844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niimi, Y. (2018). What affects happiness inequality? Evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(2), 521–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14, 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovaska, T., & Takashima, R. (2010). Does a rising tide lift all the boats? Explaining the national inequality of happiness. Journal of Economic Issues, XLIV(1), 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posel, D., & Casale, D. (2011). Relative standing and subjective wellbeing in South Africa: The role of perceptions, expectations and income mobility. Social Indicators Research, 104, 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. (2005). Climate and happiness. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios-Avila, F. (2019). Recentered Influence Functions (RIF) in stata: RIF-regression and RIF-decomposition. In 2019 stata conference 22. Stata Users Group.

  • SHP. (2019). Participation in the Swiss household panel. Retrieved February 25, 2019 from https://forscenter.ch/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/participation_shp_w1_w19.pdf.

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Happiness inequality in the United States. The Journal of Legal Studies, 37(2), 33–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. (2011). Well-being inequality and reference groups: An agenda for new research. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(1), 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1990). Inequality in happiness: Inequality in countries compared across countries. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2005). Return of inequality in modern society? Test by dispersion of life-satisfaction across time and nations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 457–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2011). The medicine is worse than the disease: Comment on Delhey and Kohler’s proposal to measure inequality in happiness using ‘instrument-effect-corrected’ standard deviations. Social Science Research, 41(1), 203–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, A., Van Doorslaer, E., & Paci, P. (1991). On the measurement of horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care. Journal of Health Economics, 10(2), 169–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. F., & Tam, T. (2015). Economic development and socioeconomic inequality of wellbeing: A cross-sectional time-series analysis of Urban China, 2003–2011. Social Indicators Research, 124(2), 401–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaborskis, A., Grincaite, M., Lenzi, M., Tesler, R., Moreno-Maldonado, C., & Mazur, J. (2019). Social inequality in adolescent life satisfaction: Comparison of measure approaches and correlation with macro-level indices in 41 countries. Social Indicators Research, 141(3), 1055–1079.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umakrishnan Kollamparambil.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 11.

Table 11 Description of explanatory variables and their expected effects on the outcome

This study has been realized using the data collected by the Swiss Household Panel (SHP), which is based at the Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS. The project is financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation. https://doi.org/10.23662/FORS-DS-932-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kollamparambil, U. Socio-Economic Inequality of Wellbeing: A Comparison of Switzerland and South Africa. J Happiness Stud 22, 555–574 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00240-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00240-w

Keywords

Navigation