Skip to main content
Log in

The Life Satisfaction of Dual-Earner Mothers and Fathers: Does Flexible Scheduling Matter?

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Work and family scholarship emphasizes flexible scheduling policies as a key solution to the challenges faced by workers navigating the work–family interface. Despite making life easier for workers, very little research has considered how such policies relate to life satisfaction, especially in terms of how gender comes into play. This study examines how both the availability of flexible scheduling options and the actual use of such policies are differentially related to the life satisfaction of dual-earner mothers and fathers. To address this research question, we use data from the National Study of the Changing Workforce conducted in the United States (N = 211 dual-earner fathers and 284 dual-earner mothers). Results show that flexible scheduling availability is unrelated to the life satisfaction of fathers and mothers. In contrast, flexible scheduling use is significantly and positively related to life satisfaction for dual-earner mothers, but negatively related to the life satisfaction of dual-earner fathers. Explanations for these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C., & Hall, L. (2011). Flexible working and happiness in the NHS. Employee Relations, 33, 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. C., Gareis, K., & Brennan, R. (2009). Reconsidering work time: A multivariate longitudinal within-couple analysis. Community, Work, & Family, 12, 105–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M. (2011). Family change and time allocation in American families. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 638, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boes, S., & Winkelmann, R. (2010). The effect of income on general life satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 95, 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2003). The 2002 national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, T., & Mittelmark, M. B. (2008). Subjective well-being among employed lone mothers in Europe: The effects of level of work/family conflict and self-enhancement versus self-transcendence value orientation. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 10, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A., Gasser, M., & Smart, L. (2004). A social-cognitive perspective on using family-friendly benefits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. B., & Skattebo, A. (2004). What is acceptable for women may not be for men: The effect of family conflicts with work on job-performance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, W. J., & Harris, C. M. (2008). Work–life benefits and organizational attachment: Self-interest utility and signaling theory models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2014). Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers. Work and Occupations, 41, 86–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, Y. (2013). Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations. Gender and Society, 27, 158–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesley, N., & Moen, P. (2006). When workers care: Dual-earner couples’ caregiving strategies, benefit use, and psychological well-being. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1248–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S., Miller, E. C., DeHaan, T., & Stewart, L. (2013). Fathers and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, G., Åkerstedt, T., Nachreiner, F., Baltieri, F., Carvalhais, J., Folkard, S., et al. (2004). Flexible working hours, health, and well-being in Europe: Some considerations from a SALTSA project. Chronobiology International, 21, 831–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, G., Sartori, S., & Åkerstedt, T. (2006). Influence of flexibility and variability of working hours on health and well-being. Chronobiology International, 23, 1125–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. R., & Frink, B. D. (2014). The origins of the ideal worker: The separation of work and home in the United States from the Market Revolution to 1950. Work and Occupations, 41, 18–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Goodman, B., Pirretti, A., & Almeida, D. (2008). Nonstandard work schedules, perceived family well-being, and daily stressors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 991–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Giusta, M., Jewell, S. L., & Kambhampati, U. S. (2011). Gender and life satisfaction in the UK. Feminist Economics, 17, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 266–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Shimazu, A., Bakker, A. B., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2013). Work-self balance: A longitudinal study on the effects of job demands and resources on personal functioning in Japanese working parents. Work & Stress, 27, 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Ingelhart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, S. (2007). Why work–life balance now? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grawitch, M. J., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Work flexibility or nonwork support? Theoretical and empirical distinctions for work–life initiatives. Consulting Psychology Journal, 62, 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., Milner, S., & Windebank, J. (2013). Work–life balance in times of economic crisis and austerity. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 33, 528–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, A., & Oun, I. (2010). Rethinking work–family conflict: Dual-earner policies, role conflict and role expansion in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, S., Zimmerman, T., Ziemba, S., & Lyness, K. (2006). Practices of dual-earner couples successfully balancing work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2005). Psychology at the intersection of work and family: Recommendations for employers, working families, and policymakers. American Psychologist, 60, 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J. (2005). Work–family facilitation and conflict, working fathers and mothers, work–family stressors and support. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 793–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J., Grzywacz, J. G., Allen, S., Blanchard, V. L., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work, and Family, 11, 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofäcker, D., & Köning, S. (2013). Flexibility and work–life conflict in times of crisis: A gender perspective. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 33, 613–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, A. J., Desrochers, S., Kopko, K., & Moen, P. (2012). Marital and family satisfaction as a function of work–family demands and community resources: Individual- and couple-level analyses. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 316–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., & Krueger, R. (2006). How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattenbach, R., Demerouti, E., & Nachreiner, F. (2010). Flexible working times: Effects on employees’ exhaustion, work-nonwork conflict and job performance. Career Development International, 15, 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, E. L., & Krone, K. J. (2002). “The policy exists but you can’t really use it”: Communication and the structuration of work–family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2005). Flexibility enactment theory: Implications of flexibility type, control, and boundary management for work–family effectiveness. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 243–261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legerski, E., & Cornwall, M. (2010). Working-class job loss, gender, and the negotiation of household labor. Gender & Society, 24, 447–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. M., Park, T.-Y., & Mehng, S. A. (2012). Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1407–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-F., Chen, L. H., & Li, T.-S. (2015). Are “we” good? A longitudinal study of we-talk and stress coping in dual-earner couples. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9621-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCampbell, A. S. (1996). Benefits achieved through alternative work schedules. Human Resource Planning, 19, 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNall, L. A., Masuda, A. D., & Nicklin, J. M. (2010). Flexible work arrangements, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. Journal of Psychology, 144, 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. K., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Matz-Costa, C., Brown, M., & Valcour, M. (2013). Across the continuum of satisfaction with work–family balance: Work hours, flexibility-fit, and work–family culture. Social Science Research, 42, 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L. (2012a). Perceived discrimination and work-to-life conflict among workers in the United States. The Sociological Quarterly, 53, 188–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L. (2012b). Family structure and the work–family interface: Work-to-family conflict among single and partnered parents. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L., Cook, A., & Minnotte, M. C. (2010). Occupation and industry sex segregation, gender, and workplace support: The use of flexible scheduling policies. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 656–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L., & Grotte, M. (2010). Understanding workday housework performance: Testing three theories. The Great Plains Sociologist, 21, 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L., Minnotte, M. C., & Bonstrom, J. (2015). Work–family conflicts and marital satisfaction among U.S. workers: Does stress amplification matter? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L., Minnotte, M. C., & Pedersen, D. E. (2013). Marital satisfaction among dual-earner couples: Gender ideologies and family-to-work conflict. Family Relations, 62, 686–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Yu, Y. (2000). Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality. Social Problems, 47, 291–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikunen, M. (2012). Changing university work, freedom, flexibility, and family. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 713–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomaguchi, K. M. (2009). Change in work–family conflict among employed parents between 1977 and 1997. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomaguchi, K. M., Milkie, M. A., & Bianchi, S. M. (2005). Time strains and psychological well-being: Do dual-earner mothers and fathers differ? Journal of Family Issues, 26, 756–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2011). Europeans work to live and Americans live to work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, V. B., & Lewis, S. (2012). Flexible friends? Flexible working time arrangements, blurred work–life boundaries and friendship. Work, Employment & Society, 26, 464–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, D. E., Minnotte, K. L., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). Getting by with a little help from workplace friends: Workplace culture, social support, and family cohesion. Marriage and Family Review, 46, 400–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, B., Charlesworth, S., & Chapman, J. (2013). Work–family and work–life pressures in Australia: Advancing gender equality in “good times”? International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 33, 594–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economy: Challenges for American families. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67, 413–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quick, J. D., Henley, A. B., & Quick, J. C. (2004). The balancing act—At work and home. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafnsdóttir, G. L., & Heijstra, T. M. (2013). Balancing work–family life in academia: The power of time. Gender, Work, and Organization, 20, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F., McBrier, D. B., & Kmec, J. A. (1999). The determinants and consequences of workplace sex and race composition. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, A. L., Civian, J. T., Shannon, L. L., Hill, E. J., & Brennan, R. T. (2008). The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work–life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements. Community, Work, and Family, 11, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, C. (1992). The flexible workplace: What have we learned? Human Resource Management, 31, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work and happy at home: A spillover-crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11, 747–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieman, S., & Glavin, P. (2011). Education and work–family conflict: Explanations, contingencies and mental health consequences. Social Forces, 89, 1341–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seal, A., Wright, J. D., & Sheley, J. (1993). Well-being and motherhood: Effects of preschool age children on the satisfactions and life experiences of working women and housewives. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. P., Kiger, G., & Riley, P. J. (2006). His, hers, or ours? Work-to-family spillover, crossover, and family cohesion. The Social Science Journal, 43, 425–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P., & Hernandez, L. A. (2013). The all-or-nothing workplace: Flexibility stigma and “opting out” among professional managerial women. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 54, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg, J. E., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Drescher-Burke, K. (2005). A question of justice: Disparities in employees’ access to flexible schedule arrangements. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 866–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work–family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Work demands and work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 707–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mills, C., & Smeaton, D. (2003). High performance management practices, working hours and work–life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winett, R., & Neale, M. (1981). Flexible work schedules and family time allocation: Assessment of a system change on individual behavior using self-report logs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, S. (2005). Work–family conflict, gender, and parenthood, 1977–1997. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 727–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krista Lynn Minnotte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minnotte, K.L., Minnotte, M.C. & Thompson, K. The Life Satisfaction of Dual-Earner Mothers and Fathers: Does Flexible Scheduling Matter?. J Happiness Stud 17, 2365–2388 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9698-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9698-5

Keywords

Navigation