Abstract
Different models have been developed to describe human experiences. One of these models is the core affect model, which states that the core of emotional experience is a simple state of feeling good or bad, energized or drowsy. Another model is the experience fluctuation model (EFM), which has been developed to map how emotions and other experiences fluctuate along with the relationship between challenges and skills. In this study, we first mathematically refined the EFM. Second, we tested if fluctuations in core affect could be modeled with a continuous wave-like sine function (Study 1). Third, we applied the sine function to our own experience-sampling data, which we collected via mobile phones from 55 university students, and located each challenge–skill relationship in a two-dimensional core affect space (Study 2). The results were consistent in both studies and showed that fluctuations in core affect dimensions, measured as a function of the relationship between challenges and skills, can be modeled with the sine function. The results also indicated that there is a systematic link between challenge–skill relationships and core affect: High challenge–high skill situations were connected to a very active and pleasant core affect, whereas high challenge–low skill situations were connected to a quite active but unpleasant core affect, low challenge–low skill situations to a very passive and unpleasant core affect, and low challenge–high skill situations to a quite passive and pleasant core affect. Compared to previous studies, this study presents a more fine-grained and comprehensive level of information on the relationship between core affect and challenges and skills.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett, L., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K., & Gross, J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
Clarke, S., & Haworth, J. (1994). ‘Flow’ experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511–523.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Optimal experience, psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The use of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 185–199.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of the Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281–294.
De Manzano, O., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., & Ullén, F. (2010). The psychophysiology of the flow during piano playing. Emotion, 10(3), 301–311.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.
Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2000). The quality of experience in adolescents’ daily lives: Developmental perspectives. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 347–367.
Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The investigation of optimal experience and apathy. European Psychologist, 4, 264–274.
Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures. Social empowerment through personal growth. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ellis, G., Voelkl, J., & Morris, C. (1994). Measurement and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 337–356.
Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A., Johnson, D., Meyer, P., & Penn, D. (2010). Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 849–864.
Hektner, J., Schmidt, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Huta, V. (2012). Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: Parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 47–61.
Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932.
Kimhy, D., Delespaul, P., & Corcoran, C. (2006). Computerized experience sampling method (ESMc). Assessing feasibility and validity among individuals with schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40, 221–230.
Lang, P. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385.
Larsen, R., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (Vol. 13, pp. 25–59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Larsen, J., McGraw, A., & Cacioppo, J. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 684–696.
Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 266–287). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massimini, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Carli, M. (1987). The monitoring of optimal experience: A tool for psychiatric rehabilitation. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 545–549.
Moneta, G. B. (2004). The flow model of intrinsic motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 181–217.
Moneta, G., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Models of concentration in natural environments: A comparative approach based on streams of experiential data. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 603–638.
Moneta, G., & Wong, Q. (2002). The daily affect of heroin addicts in a therapeutic comminity: A pilot study in Hong Kong. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 561–565.
Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., Jalonen, S., Kosonen, K., Heikkilä, A., Lonka, K., Inkinen, M., Salmela-Aro, K., Linnanen, J., & Salo, K. (2007). Process- and context-sensitive research on academic knowledge practices: Developing CASS-tools and methods. In Proceedings of the computer supported collaborative learning conference. New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University, July 16–21, 2007.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 195–206). New York: Oxford University Press.
Peeters, F., Berkhof, J., & Delespaul, P. (2006). Diurnal mood variation in major depressive disorder. Emotion, 6, 383–391.
Russell, J. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
Russell, J. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
Russell, J. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1259–1283.
Russell, J., & Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819.
Schallberger, U., & Pfister, R. (2001). Flow-erleben in arbeit und freizeit: Eine untersuchung zum ‘paradox der arbeit’ mit der experience sampling method (ESM). Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 45, 176–187.
Schmidt, A., Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Individual and situational factors related to the experience of flow in adolescence: A multilevel approach. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 542–558). New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Scollon, C., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34.
Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 57–60.
Sirois, B., & Burg, M. (2003). Negative emotion and coronary heart disease: A review. Behavior Modification, 27, 83–102.
Song, Z., Foo, M.-D., & Uy, M. (2008). Mood spillover and crossover among dual-earner couples: A cell phone event sampling study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 443–452.
Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65–94.
Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297–303.
Thayer, R. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and activation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tolvanen, A., Kiuru, N., Leskinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Inkinen, M., Lonka, K., et al. (2011). A new approach for estimating a nonlinear growth component in multilevel modelling. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 370–379.
Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.
Yik, M., & Russell, J. (2004). On the relationship between circumplexes: Affect and Wiggins’ IAS. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 203–230.
Yik, M., Russell, J., & Barrett, L. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 600–619.
Yik, M., Russell, J., & Steiger, J. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11, 705–731.
Acknowledgments
Contributions were made by all researchers. The study was partially funded by the RYM Indoor Environment 462054 of the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, and Academy of Finland 134931, 139128 (PI Salmela-Aro) and 121207 (PI Kai Hakkarainen), and the Jacobs Foundation (PI Salmela-Aro). We would like to thank several persons who have contributed to researching and developing the CASS and our study, including Annamari Heikkilä, Satu Jalonen, Kari Kosonen, Lasse Lipponen, Juha Linnanen, Kristian London, Visa Parviainen, Niclas Sandström, and Petri Vesikivi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inkinen, M., Lonka, K., Hakkarainen, K. et al. The Interface Between Core Affects and the Challenge–Skill Relationship. J Happiness Stud 15, 891–913 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9455-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9455-6