Abstract
How can we visualize similarity and difference across cultural conceptions of a good or worthy life? To examine the internal structure of such conceptions, we asked 584 university students from mainland China and Canada to indicate the relative importance of 30 elements or criteria commonly used in defining a good life. Statistical comparison and multidimensional scaling were used to reveal the form and extent of group commonalities and differences on the criteria and their meaning in relation to underlying dimensions of individual and cultural variation. The results suggested that South Asian Canadians were more oriented towards moral, spiritual, and beneficent concerns in envisioning a good life than were the mainland Chinese and Western European Canadians. The Chinese, for their part, tended to emphasize practical, prudential, and socially defined goods. This contrasted with the Western European Canadians, who showed more preference for personally defined, internal goods. East Asian Canadians fell between Chinese and Western European Canadians in overall orientation, reflecting their biculturality. All groups placed heavy emphasis on close and enduring relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57, 774–783.
Arzy, S., Collette, S., Ionta, S., Fornari, E., & Blanke, O. (2009). Subjective mental time line: The functional architecture of projecting the self to past and future. Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 2009–2017.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Boston: Beacon.
Blackmore, S. (2000). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling theory. New York: Springer.
Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling theory and applications. New York: Springer.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. vol 3: Loss. New York: Basic Books.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 21, 723–742.
Busing, F. M. T. A., Groenen, P. J. F., & Heiser, W. J. (2005). Avoiding degeneracy in multidimensional unfolding by penalizing on the coefficient of variation. Psychometrika, 70, 49–76.
Buss, D. M. (2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Cozolino, L. (2006). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain. New York: Norton.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 227–268.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Fischer, R. (2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: A classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 263–282.
Gilbert, D. (2007). Stumbling on happiness. London: Harpercollins.
Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. (2002). Social connections in China: Institutions, culture and the changing nature of guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gunde, R. (2002). Culture and customs of China. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption. New York: Touchstone.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Inglehart, R. (2006). Mapping global values. Comparative Sociology, 5, 115–136.
Jahanbegloo, R. (2008). The spirit of India. New Delhi: Penguin.
Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. (2003). The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy: Cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 113–161). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Lee, J. W., & Jones, P. S. (2002). Cultural differences in response to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 25, 295–306.
Lim, T. S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework: solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415–450.
Main, M. (1999). Epilogue: Attachment theory: Eighteen points with suggestions for future studies. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment theory: Research and clinical applications (pp. 845–857). New York: Guilford Press.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Culture, self, and the reality of the social. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 277–283.
McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.
Miller, P. J., Fung, H., & Mintz, J. (1996). Self-construction through narrative practices: A Chinese and American comparison of early socialization. Ethos, 24, 237–280.
Nakamura, H. (1997). Ways of thinking of eastern peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan revised (ed). London: Kegan Paul International.
Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2002). Culture and cognition. In D. L. Medina (Ed.), Stevens handbook of experimental psychology. Wiley Online. doi: 10.1002/0471214426.
Palkivala, N. (2002). We, the people. New Delhi: UBS Publishers and Distributors.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transcripts of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences, 362, 773–786.
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1124, 39–60.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182.
Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.
Stevens, J. P. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tafarodi, R. W., Bonn, G., Liang, H., Takai, J., Moriizumi, S., Belhekar, V., et al. (2012). What makes for a good life? A four-nation study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 783–800.
Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
Vyas, R. N. (1992). Nature of Indian culture. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.
Weber, M. (2002). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. P. Baehr & G. C. Wells, Trans. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1905).
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.
Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeh, L. L., Kim, K. O., Chompreeda, P., Rimkeeree, H., Yau, N. J. N., & Lundahl, D. S. (1998). Comparison in use of the 9-point hedonic scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans, and Thai. Food Quality and Preference, 9, 416–419.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by a Standard Research Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410–2006–1127) to the second author. We thank Lindie Liang, Sara Houshmand, Tiffany Jenzer, and Parisa Ghanbari for their assistance with data collection and translation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonn, G., Tafarodi, R.W. Visualizing the Good Life: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. J Happiness Stud 14, 1839–1856 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9412-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9412-9