Abstract
Utilitarians and egalitarians have different priorities. Utilitarians prioritize the greatest level of happiness in society and are prepared to accept inequality, while egalitarians prioritize the smallest differences and are willing to accept a loss of happiness for this purpose. In theory these moral tenets conflict, but do they really clash in practice? This question is answered in two steps. First I consider the relation between level and inequality of happiness in nations; level of happiness is measured using average responses to a survey question on life satisfaction and inequality is measured with the standard deviation. There appears to be a strong negative correlation; in nations where average happiness is high, the standard deviation tends to be low. This indicates harmony instead of tension. Secondly I consider the institutional factors that are likely to affect happiness. It appears that level and equality of happiness depend largely on the same institutional context, which is another indication for harmony. We may conclude that the discussion between utilitarians and egalitarians is of little practical importance. This conclusion implies that increasing income inequality can go together with decreasing inequality in happiness and this conclusion provides moral support for Governments developing modern market economics
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Delhey, J.: 2004, Life Satisfaction in an Enlarged Europe European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Inglehart, R. et al. 2002, World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1999–2001 (Computer file) ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research (producer), 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor). 2004.
W.M. Kalmijn R. Veenhoven (2005) ArticleTitle‘Measuring inequality of happiness in nations. In search for proper statistics’ Journal of Happiness Studies 6 357–396
D. Kaufmann A. Kraay M. Mastruzzi (2005) Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators For 1996–2004 World Bank Washington, DC, USA
A.M. Okun (1975) Equality and Efficiency: The Big Trade-off Brookings Institution Washington DC, USA
J. Rawls (1971) A Theory of Justice Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
P. Schyns (2003) Income and Life Satisfaction; chapter 2; Life satisfaction: the concept, its measurability and cross-national comparability Eburon, Delft The Netherlands
A. Sen (1999) Development as Freedom Oxford University Press UK
Smith, A.: 1776, The Wealth Of Nations UK.
R. Veenhoven (1984) Conditions of Happiness Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands
R. Veenhoven (2005) ArticleTitle‘Return of inequality in modern society?’ Journal of Happiness Studies 5 457–487
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ott, J. Level and Inequality of Happiness in Nations: Does Greater Happiness of a Greater Number Imply Greater Inequality in Happiness?. J Happiness Stud 6, 397–420 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-8856-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-8856-6