Abstract
This paper examines the joint dynamics between house prices, population aging and unemployment in South Africa. It uses provincial-level data set to compare the demographic effects of house prices across different housing segments over the period from 1995 to 2015. When heterogeneity, endogeneity and spatial effects are controlled for, the analysis finds that on average in the past 22 years, population aging has contributed to the decline of the South African house prices by 6.28 and 7.52 basis point in the large and medium housing segments, respectively, while the small segment has remained unaffected. Likewise, unemployment appears to have played a significant role in slowing down the growth rate of house prices across segments but to a lesser extent. While the response of real house prices to demographic shift is consistent with the life cycle hypothesis, the insensitivity of small house prices to aging might reveal the mitigating effect of the retirees’ relocation from larger segment houses to smaller ones. The relocation effect might induce higher demand of small segment houses which drives up their prices and offsets the detrimental effect of aging. These findings suggest that increasing the incentive to prolong the retirement age or engage elderly population in other income-generating activities to meet their increasing financial needs given the meagre social security system is likely to sustain the growth prospective of housing value in South Africa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Africa, South Africa has the highest proportions of older population, with 13.3% of the total population aged 50 years or older, and nearly 7% aged 60 years or older (Kinsella and Ferreira 1997; SAGE South Africa, WHO 2011). This occurs as a result of a sharp decline in fertility rate associated with the increase in the life expectancy (from 52.7 years in 2002 to about 59 years in 2015) (WHO 2015).
In micro-level studies, price-to-income ratio has also been used as an alternative proxy for housing affordability (Kim and Cho 2010), which is, however, not included in our analysis due to data availability.
The estimated coefficients are obtained using Stata code provided by Drukker et al. (2013).
Part of this heterogeneity has been inherited from the historical residential segregation introduced in 1966 by the Apartheid administration through the Group Areas Act 36 which forced people to live in separate residential areas based on their race. According to Kotze (1999), this residential segregation bore significant consequences on post-democracy regional property prices.
Though in the small-segment housing the log-likelihood function appears to be greater in non-IV spatial model, the adjusted R2 remains greater in the spatial IV specification, consistently with the remaining segments.
The normal distribution assumption fails to hold for the middle-medium housing segment; possible suggesting a misspecification issue. However, the objective of comparing the responses of real estate prices to demographic changes across housing segments is conditioned upon the use of identical empirical strategy which appears to be that of the majority of the housing submarkets.
References
Ando, A., & Modigliani, F. (1963). The ‘‘Life Cycle’’ hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests. The American Economic Review, 53(1), 55–84.
Ang, A., & Maddaloni, A. (2005). Do demographic changes affect risk premiums? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business, 78(1), 341–380.
Apergis, N., Simo-Kengne, B. D., & Gupta, R. (2015). Convergence in provincial-level South African house prices: Evidence from the Club convergence and clustering procedure. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 27(1), 2–17.
Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.
Banerjee, A., Galiani, S., Levinsohn, J., McLaren, Z., & Woolard, I. (2008). Why has unemployment risen in the New South Africa? Economics of Transition, 16(4), 715–740.
Bhattacharya, R., & Kim, S. W. (2011). Economic fundamentals, subprime lending and house prices: Evidence from MSA-level panel data. Housing Studies, 26(6), 897–910.
Boehm, T. P., & Schlottmann, A. M. (2014). The dynamics of housing tenure choice: Lessons from Germany and the United States. Journal of Housing Economics, 25, 1–19.
Burger, L., & Van Rensburg, J. (2008). Metropolitan house prices in South Africa: Do they converge? South African Journal of Economics, 76(2), 291–297.
Caliman, T., & di Bella, E. (2010). Spatial autoregressive models for house price dynamics in Italy. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1645156 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1645156.
Chiuri, M., & Jappelli, T. (2010). Do the elderly reduce housing equity? An international comparison. Journal of Population Economics, 23(2), 643–663.
Clark, W. A. V., & Deurloo, M. C. (2006). Aging in place and housing over-consumption. Journal of Housing the Built Environment, 21(3), 257–270.
Das, S., Gupta, R., & Kabundi, A. (2011). Forecasting regional house price inflation: A comparison between dynamic factor models and vector autoregressive models. Journal of Forecasting, 30(2), 288–302.
DiPasquale, D., & Wheaton, W. C. (1994). Housing market dynamics and the future of housing prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 35(1), 1–27.
Drukker, D. M., Prucha, I. R., & Raciborski, R. (2011). A command for estimating spatial autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive disturbances and additional endogenous variables. Working paper, The University of Maryland, Department of Economics, http://econweb.umd.edu/~prucha/Papers/WP_spivreg_2011.pdf.
Drukker, D. M., Pruch, R., & Raciborski, R. (2013). A command for estimating spatial-autoregressive models with spatial-autoregressive disturbances and additional endogenous variables. Stata Journal, 13, 287–301.
Eichholtz, P., & Lindenthal, T. (2014). Demographics, human capital, and the demand for housing. Journal of Housing Economics, 26(1), 19–32.
Engelhardt, G., & Poterba, J. M. (1991). Demographics and house prices: The Canadian evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, 539–546.
Ermisch, J. (1996). The demand for housing in Britain and population ageing: Microeconometric evidence. Economica, 63(251), 383–404.
Fernández-Villaverde, J., & Krueger, D. (2007). Consumption over the life cycle: Facts from consumer expenditure survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 552–565.
Flavin, M., & Yamashita, T. (2002). Owner-occupied housing and the composition of the household portfolio. American Economic Review, 92(1), 345–362.
Hiller, N., & Lerbs, O. W. (2016). Aging and urban house prices. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 60, 276–291.
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.
Keese, M. (2012). Downsize, undermaintain, or leave it as it is: Housing choices of elder Germans. CESifo Economic Studies, 58(3), 570–598.
Kelejian, H. H., & Prucha, I. R. (1999). A generalized spatial two stage least square procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 99–121.
Kelejian, H. H., & Robinson, D. P. (1993). A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to a county expenditure model. Papers in Regional Science, 72, 297–312.
Kim, K. H., & Cho, M. (2010). Structural changes, house price dynamics and housing affordability in Korea. Housing Studies, 25(6), 839–856.
Kinsella, K., & Ferreira, M. (1997). Ageing trends: South Africa. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1997.
Kotze, N. J. (1999). The influence of residential desegregation on property prices in South Africa: The Pietersburg case study. Tydskrif Vir Gesinsekologie en Verbruikerswetenskappe, 27(1), 48–54.
Kraft, H., & Munk, C. (2011). Optimal housing consumption and investment decisions over the life cycle. Management Science, 57(6), 1025–1041.
Lee, L. F. (2003). Best Spatial two-stage least squares estimators for a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Econometric Reviews, 22, 307–335.
LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2011). Pitfalls in higher order model extensions of basic spatial regression methodology. The Review of Regional Studies, 41(1), 13–26.
Maddaloni, A., Musso, A., Rother, P., Ward-Warmedinger, M., & Westermann, T. (2006). Macroeconomic implications of demographic developments in the Euro area. Occasional paper 51/2006, European central bank.
Maennig, W., & Dust, L. (2008). Shrinking and growing metropolitan areas asymmetric real estate price reactions?: The case of German single-family houses. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(1), 63–69.
Mankiw, N. G., & Weil, D. N. (1989). The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19(2), 235–258.
Modigliani, F. (1986). Life-cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations. American Economic Review, 76(3), 297–313.
Modigliani, F., & Brumberg, R. H. (1954). Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. In K. K. Kurihara (Ed.), Post-keynesian economics (pp. 388–436). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Modigliani, F., & Brumberg, R. H. (1980). Utility analysis and aggregate consumption functions: An atternpt at integration. In A. Abel (Ed.), The collected papers of Franco Modigliani. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pace, R. K., & Zhu, S. (2012). Separable spatial modeling of spillovers and disturbances. Journal of Geographical Systems, 14(1), 75–90.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. IZA Discussion Paper. No. 1240.
Podesta, F. (2002). Recent developments in quantitative comparative methodology: The case of pooled time series cross-section analysis. Discussion papers soc 3–02.
Rapach, D. E., & Strauss, J. K. (2007). Forecasting real housing price growth in the eighth district states. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Regional Economic Development, 3(2), 33–42.
Rapach, D. E., & Strauss, J. K. (2009). Differences in housing price forecastability across U.S. states. International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 351–372.
Saita, Y., Shimizu, C., & Watanabe, T. (2013). Aging and real estate prices: Evidence from Japanese and US regional data. Tokyo Center for Economic Research (TCER), Paper No. E-68.
Swamy, P. A. V. B., & Tavlas, G. S. (1995). Random coefficient models: Theory and applications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 9(2), 165–196.
Takats, E. (2012). Aging and house prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 21, 131–141.
Vargas-Silva, C. (2008). The effect of monetary policy on housing: A factor augmented approach. Applied Economics Letters, 15(10), 749–752.
World Health Organization (WHO) and United States National Institute on Aging (U.S. NIA) eds. (2011). Global health and aging. https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health/en/.
WHO. (2015). World report on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Yang, F. (2009). Consumption over the life cycle: How di erent is housing? Review of Economic Dynamics, 12, 423–443.
Funding
Funding was provided by National Research Foundation (Grant No. TTK150707123686).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
See Fig. 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simo-Kengne, B.D. Population aging, unemployment and house prices in South Africa. J Hous and the Built Environ 34, 153–174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9624-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9624-3