Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Affordability, poverty and housing need: triangulating measures and standards

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last 25 years, ‘affordability’ has become a more important issue in housing policy, although it is still not fully enshrined in agreed standards, partly due to different views about how it should be measured and at what thresholds. This paper argues that subjective evidence of payment problems and material hardship can be used to validate ratio measures and points to the best thresholds to use. Using household panel survey evidence it is shown that traditional affordability ratios are still probably the best objective measure, with residual income ratios in a supporting role; and that relatively generous thresholds are better. Composites with subjective payment problems are well validated by independent evidence on material hardship, and are associated with higher incidence of moves and other housing needs. These problems are much more prevalent in private renting, with less variation between regions than household types. Multivariate models shows strong effects from income and prices interacted with interest rates, especially for owners, with significant labour market and demographic effects, and substantial effects for renters from the supply of social lettings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armenoff, K. (1998). Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(3), 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., & Marlier, E. (2010). Income and living conditions in Europe. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K. (2004). Review of housing supply: Delivering stability: Securing our future housing needs. Final report & recommendations. London: TSO/H M Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (Ed.). (1993). Budget standards for the United Kingdom. Aldershot: Avebury/Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. (1990). Access, affordability and housing need. Paper presented at ESRC Housing Studies Conference, University of Surrey, Sept 1990. Mimeo, SAUS: University of Bristol.

  • Bramley, G. (1994). An affordability crisis in British housing: dimensions, causes and policy impact. Housing Studies, 9(1), 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. (2006). Affordability comes of age. In P. Malpass & L. Cairncross (Eds.), Building on the Past: visions of housing futures (pp. 127–162). Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Bramley, G., Pawson, H., White, M., Watkins, D., & Pleace, N. (2010). Estimating housing need. Housing Research Report. Department of Communities and Local Government. London: DCLG. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/estimatinghousingneed.

  • Brewer, M., o’Dea, C., Paull, G., & Sibieta, L. (2009). The living standards of families with children reporting low incomes DWP Research Report 577. London: Department of Work and Pensions. http://www.research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rports2009-2010/rrep577.pdf.

  • Chaplin, R., & Freeman, A. (1999). Towards an accurate description of affordability. Urban Studies, 11, 1949–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Hao, Q., & Stephens, M. (2010). Assessing housing affordability in post-reform China: A case study of Shanghai. Housing Studies, 25(6), 877–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Communities and Local Government (CLG). (2006). A decent home: Definition and guidance for implementation, department for communities and local government, June 2006. London: CLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communities and Local Government (CLG). (2007). Strategic housing market assessment guidance. London: CLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Family Budget Unit. (2002). Summary budgets at low cost but acceptable level. University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/res/fbu/documents/lcba_budget_aug2002.pdf.

  • Fahmy, E., Levitas, R., Gordon, D., & Patsios, D. (2009). Understanding the risks of social exclusion across the life course: Working age adults without dependent children. Research Report to Social Exclusion Task Force, Cabinet Office. http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk.

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2010). Mortgage market review: Responsible lending. Consultation Paper 10/16. London: FSA. http://www.fsa.gov.uk.

  • Ford, J., Burrows, R., & Nettleton, S. (2001). Homeownership in a risk society. Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Gordon, D., & Pantazis, C. (1997). Breadline Britain in the 1990s. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigsby, W., & Rosenburg, L. (1975). Urban housing policy. New York: APS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A.-C. (2010). EU 2020 poverty reduction: Concepts, figures and challenge, Conference “Countdown to Europe 2020: Towards ‘Appropriate Indicators’ to Measure Poverty Reduction in the EU”, Centre for Parliamentary studies, 29th June 2010, Bruxelles.

  • Hancock, K. (1993). “Can Pay? Won’t Pay?” or economic principles of “Affordability”. Urban Studies, 30(1), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, A. (1992). Affordability of housing association tenants. Journal of Social Policy, 21(4), 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempson, E., McKay, S., & Willitts, M. (2004). Characteristics of families in debt and the nature of indebtedness; DWP Research Summary; http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/summ2003-2004/211summ.pdf.

  • Kutty, N. (2005). A new measure of housing affordability: Estimates and analytical results. Housing Policy Debate, 16(1), 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linneman, P., & Megbolugbe, I. (1992). Housing affordability: Myth or reality? Urban Studies, 29(3), 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., & Levitas, R. (2006). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (2006a). What is housing affordability: The case for the residual income approach. Housing Policy Debate, 17(1), 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (2006b). A housing affordability standard for the UK. Housing Studies, 21(4), 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thalmann, P. (1999). Identifying households which need housing assistance. Urban Studies, 36(11), 1933–1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. (1991). From need to affordability: An analysis of UK housing objectives. Urban Studies, 28(6), 871–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, N. M., & Lau, K. Y. (2002). Setting rent with reference to tenants’ affordability: Public housing rent policy in Hong Kong. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 17(4), 409–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK

    Glen Bramley

Authors
  1. Glen Bramley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glen Bramley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bramley, G. Affordability, poverty and housing need: triangulating measures and standards. J Hous and the Built Environ 27, 133–151 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-011-9255-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-011-9255-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation