Abstract
Many area-based initiatives in deprived urban neighbourhoods seek to reduce the number of residents who move away from the area. One common objective is to keep those with jobs or middle incomes in order to avoid further concentration of poor people and social problems. This paper is based on a study of how residents in 12 deprived urban areas in Denmark evaluate their neighbourhood and how this is connected to their wish to move or stay. The purpose is to expose the importance of residents’ subjective evaluations of the neighbourhood and its reputation for their inclination to stay or move away. Some conclusions are drawn for area-based initiatives that could reduce mobility. The study shows a strong connection between residents’ perception of the reputation of their neighbourhood and their plans to move, but it also shows that other factors have great importance too. Dissatisfaction due to social problems and crime are the main reasons for moving away from deprived neighbourhoods, especially among residents in employment. Strong social relations within the neighbourhood prove to significantly reduce the intention to move.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (1998) Reconnecting excluded communities: The neighbourhood impacts of owner occupation. Research Report 61. Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.
Basolo, V., & Strong, D. (2002) Understanding the neighbourhood: From residents’ perception and needs to action. Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 83–105.
Beekman, T., Lyons, F., & Scott, J. (2001). Improving the understanding of the influence of owner-occupiers in mixed tenure neighbourhoods. Report 89. Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.
Brown, L. A., & Moore, E. G. (1970). The intra-urban migration process: a perspective. Geografiska Annaler Series B, 52(1), 1–13.
Burrows, R., & Rhodes, D. (1998) Unpopular places? Area disadvantage and the geography of misery in England. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Carp, F., Zawadski, R., & Shokron, H. (1976) Dimensions of urban environmental quality. Environment and Behaviour, 8, 239–265.
Clark, W. A. V., & Ledwith. V. (2005). Mobility, housing stress and neighborhood contexts: Evidence from Los Angeles. California Center for Population Research. On-line Working Paper Series.
Cole, I., & Shayer, S. (1998). Tenure mix as social fix? community diversity and social networks on mixed housing estates. Paper to ENHR conference, Cardiff 7–11. September 1998.
Costa Pinho, T. (2000). Residential contexts of social exclusion: Images and identities. Paper for ENHR Conference, Gävle 2000.
De Groot, C., Manting, D., & Mulder, C. H. (2007). Intentions to move and actual moving behaviour in the Netherlands. Paper for ENHR Conference Rotterdam 2007.
Dekker, K., Musterd, S., & Van Kempen, R. (2007). Explaining differentials in housing and neighbourhood satisfaction in post-WWII large housing estates in European cities. Paper for ENHR Conference, Rotterdam.
Feijten, P., & Van Ham, M. (2007). Neighbourhood change … reason to leave? Paper for ENHR Conference Rotterdam 2007.
Franscescato, G., Wiedemann, S., & Anderson, J. R. (1987). Residential Satisfaction. In W. van Vliet, et al. (Eds.), Housing and neighbourhoods. Theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 43–58). New York/London: Greenwood Press.
Friedrichs, J., & Blasius, J. (2006). Attitudes of owners and renters in a deprived neighbourhood. Paper to ENHR Conference in Ljubljana 2006.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Blackwell.
Galster, G., Hayes, C., & Johnston, J. (2002). Identifying robust, parsimonious indicators of neighbourhood quality of life. Wayne State University.
Johnston, R. J. (1973). Spatial patterns in suburban evaluations. Environment and Planning A, 5, 385–395.
Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328–339.
Kearns, A., & Parkes, A. (2003). Living in and leaving poor neighbourhood conditions in England. Housing Studies, 18(6), 827–852.
Knox, P. (1995). Urban social geography. London: Longman.
Koopman, M. J. (2007). Looking from the inside out or from the outside in: Differences and associations between neighbourhood push and pull. Paper for ENHR Conference Rotterdam 200.
Lee, B. A., Oreposa, R. S., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighbourhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31(2), 249–270.
Lu, M. (1998) Analyzing migration decision making: relationship between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions and moving behaviour. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1473–1495.
Lu, M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction. Growth and Change, 30, 264–287.
Massey, D. (1995). The conceptualisation of space. In D. Massey & P. Jess (Eds.), A place in the world. Oxford: University Press.
McHugh, K., Gober, P., & Reid, N. (1990). Determinants of short- and long-term mobility expectations for home owners and renters. Demography, 27, 81–95.
Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002) What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.
Permentier, M., Van Ham, M., & Bolt, G. (2007). Behavioural responses to neighbourhood reputations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(2), 199–213.
Rijpers, B., & Smeets, J. (1998). Housing challenge: Managing neighbourhoods image. Paper to ENHR conference, Cardiff 7–11. September 1998.
Rossi, P. H. (1955) Why families move. Illinois. The Free Press.
Speare, A. J., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. H. (1974). Residential mobility, migration and metropolitan change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Skifter Andersen, H. (1999). Virkningerne af Byudvalgets indsats i almene boligafdelinger 1994–97 (Effects of area-based initiatives on social housing estates in Denmark). SBI-report 321, Horsholm: Danish Building and Urban Research.
Skifter Andersen, H (2002a). Excluded places. On the interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighbourhoods. Housing, Theory and Society, 19, 153–169.
Skifter Andersen, H. (2002b). Can Deprived Housing Areas be revitalised? Efforts against segregation and neighbourhood decay in Denmark and Europe. Urban Studies, 39(4).
Skifter Andersen, H. (2003). Urban Sores. On the interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighbourhoods. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Skifter Andersen, H. (2004). Residents’ understanding of deprived urban neighbourhoods and its significance for plans to move. Paper to ENHR Conference Cambridge 2004.
Skifter Andersen, H. (2006a). Moving to and from enclaves. Housing choices of ethnic minorities in Denmark. Paper to Workshop on Minority Ethnic Groups and Housing: Perceptions and Perspectives, ENHR Conference in Ljubliana, 2–5 July 2006.
Skifter Andersen, H. (2006b). Undersøgelse af til- og fraflytningen fra 3 multietniske boligområder (Study of moves to and from three multietniske boligområder housing areas). Horsholm: Danish Building Research Institute.
Skifter Andersen, H., & Kielgast, L. (2003). De syv første kvarterløft. Sammenfattende evaluering af udviklingen 1997–2002. Horsholm: Danish Building and Urban Research.
Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159–169.
Ærø, T. (2001). Boligpræferencer, boligvalg og livsstil (Housing preferences, choice of dwelling and lifestyle). PhD. Thesis. Horsholm: Danish Building and Urban Research.
Ærø, T. (2004). Forebyggelse af normbrud og konflikter i boligområder (Prevention of violation of norms and conflicts in housing areas). In H. Skifter Andersen & H. T. Andersen (Eds.), Den mangfoldige by. Horsholm: Danish Building Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, H.S. Why do residents want to leave deprived neighbourhoods? The importance of residents’ subjective evaluations of their neighbourhood and its reputation. J Hous and the Built Environ 23, 79–101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-008-9109-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-008-9109-x