Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial assimilation of minority groups

The case of suburbanizing Surinamese in the Rotterdam region

  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent debate on segregation in western European countries has been framed with significantly different assumptions from those prevailing in the study of minority-group housing segregation in the US. In the public debate in western European countries, segregation of minority groups is increasingly blamed on those groups themselves. In a now popular narrative, they are thought of as sticking consciously together and not subscribing to the aspirations, including housing preferences, of the indigenous population. Using data on suburbanization in the Rotterdam metropolitan area, we show that that economically successful and socially upwardly mobile migrants of Surinamese background show the same volume and pattern of geographic mobility as do the native Dutch. On top of that, they use the same narrative as other suburbanizing groups in the past. Contrary to the now dominant policy view, it seems that class, more so than ethnicity, determines metropolitan residential patterns and the dynamics behind them. Our data do not corroborate the notion that members of migrant groups have housing preferences that significantly deviate from those of the middle-class Dutch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, R. D. & Logan, J. R. (1991). Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography, 28, 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., Marzan, G. & Zhang, W. (1999). Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A re-examination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review, 64(3), 646–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, G. (2001). Wooncarrières van Turken en Marokkanen in ruimtelijk perspectief. Utrecht: Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunt, L. (1974). Stedeling op het platteland. Een antropologisch onderzoek naar de verhoudingen tussen autochtonen en nieuwkomers in Stroomkerken. Meppel: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgers, J. (2002). De gefragmenteerde stad. Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgers, J. & Musterd, S. (2002). Understanding urban inequality: A model based on existing theories and an empirical illustration. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, de P. (2004). De ondraaglijke lichtheid van het beleid voor de stad in Vlaanderen. Antwerpen: Faculteit Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz, N. (1981). Ethnic segregation: Social reality and academic myth. In: C. Peach, V. Robinson & S. Smith (Eds.), Ethnic segregation in cities. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman, R., van der Leun, J. & Rath, J. (1997). Over grenzen. Immigranten en de informale economie. Amsterdam: IMES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and an empirical review. Sociology and Sociological Research, 69, 315–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van VROM (2004). ȁ8Zwarte vluchtȁ9: De (sub)urbane locatiekeuze van klassieke allochtonen in Amsterdam. Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivola, P. S. (1999). Laws of the landscape. How policies shape cities in Europe and America. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostveen, W. P. (2002 & 2003). Buurtmonitor Gemeente Capelle aan den IJssel. Enschede: Febodruk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palen, J. J. (1995). The Suburbs. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saal, C. D. (1972). Dorp en route, waartoe en waarheen? In: De Gids, 4.

  • Snel, E (2003). De vermeende kloof tussen culturen (inaugural lecture).

  • Snel, E., Burgers, J., Steijn, B., Leerkes, A. & Veenman, J. (2002). Klassenpositie van allochtonen in de postindustriële economie. Sociale Enschede: Universiteit van Twente. Wetenschappen jrg, 46(3), 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J. & Crowder, K. D. (1997). Residential mobility between city and suburbs: Race, suburbanization and back-to-the-city moves. Demography, 34, 525–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (1960). The eclipse of community. An interpretation of American studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1978). The declining significance of race. Blacks and changing American institutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Burgers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burgers, J., van der Lugt, H. Spatial assimilation of minority groups. J Housing Built Environ 21, 127–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9038-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9038-5

Keywords

Navigation