Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Qualitative Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Practices by Primary Care Physicians

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, but no scientific organization currently recommends screening because of limited evidence for its effectiveness. Despite this, physicians often order screening tests such as chest X-rays and computerized tomography scans for their patients. Limited information is available about how physicians decide when to order these tests. To identify factors that affect whether physicians’ screen patients for lung cancer, we conducted five 75-min telephone-based focus groups with 28 US primary care physicians and used inductive qualitative research methods to analyze their responses. We identified seven factors that influenced these physicians’ decisions about screening patients for lung cancer: (1) their perception of a screening test’s effectiveness, (2) their attitude toward recommended screening guidelines, (3) their practice experience, (4) their perception of a patient’s risk for lung cancer, (5) reimbursement and payment for screening, (6) their concern about litigation, and (7) whether a patient requested screening. Because these factors may have conflicting effects on physicians’ decisions to order screening tests, physicians may struggle in determining when screening for lung cancer is appropriate. We recommend (1) more clinician education, beginning in medical school, about the existing evidence related to lung cancer screening, with emphasis on the benefit of and training in tobacco use prevention and cessation, (2) more patient education about the benefits and limitations of screening, (3) further studies about the effect of patients’ requests to be screened on physicians’ decisions to order screening tests, and (4) larger, quantitative studies to follow up on our formative data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. (2010). United States cancer statistics: 1999–2007 incidence and mortality. Web-based Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2010.

  2. Altekruse, S. F., Kosary, C. L., Krapcho, M., et al. (Eds.). (2010). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2007. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site.

  3. Smith, R. A., Glynn, T. J. (2000). Early lung cancer detection: Current and ongoing challenges. Cancer, 89(11 Suppl), 2327–2328.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Humphrey, L. L., Teutsch, S., Johnson, M. (2004). Lung cancer screening with sputum cytologic examination, chest radiography, and computed tomography: An update for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140(9), 740–753.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lung Cancer Alliance. (2010). Current early detection options. http://www.lungcanceralliance.org/eirc/screen/screening_positions.html. Accessed 29 Dec 2010.

  6. Bach, P. B., Jett, J. R., Pastorino, U., Tockman, M. S., Swensen, S. J., & Begg, C. B. (2007). Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA, 297(9), 953–961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Menezes, R. J., Roberts, H. C., Paul, N. S., et al. (2010). Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: The Toronto experience. Lung Cancer, 67(2), 177–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henschke, C. I., Yankelevitz, D. F., Libby, D. M., Pasmantier, M. W., Smith, J. P., & Miettinen, O. S. (2006). Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(17), 1763–1771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris, G. (2008). Cigarette company paid for lung cancer study. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/health/research/26lung.html. Accessed 6 Nov 2010.

  10. Hocking, W. G., Hu, P., Oken, M. M., et al. (2010). Lung cancer screening in the randomized prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102(10), 722–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, K. W., Gierada, D. S., Marquez, G., et al. (2009). Collecting 48,000 CT exams for the lung screening study of the national lung screening trial. Journal of Digital Imaging, 22(6), 667–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, G. (2010). CT scans cut lung cancer deaths, study finds. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/05/health/research/05cancer.html?_r=3&hp. Accessed 6 Nov 2010.

  13. Klabunde, C. N., Marcus, P. M., Silvestri, G. A., et al. (2010). U.S. primary care physicians’ lung cancer screening beliefs and recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(5), 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Charmaz, K. (2004). Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 976–993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Macqueen, K. M., McLoughlin, K., Alleman, P., Burke, H. M., & Mack, N. (2008). Partnering for care in HIV prevention trials. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(4), 5–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., et al. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(26), 2635–2645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson, H. D., Tyne, K., Naik, A., Bougatsos, C., Chan, B. K., Humphrey, L. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: An update for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(10), 727–737, W237–W742.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stinchcombe, T. E., Detterbeck, F. C., Lin, L., Rivera, M. P., & Socinski, M. A. (2007). Beliefs among physicians in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2(9), 819–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Burger, I. M., Kass, N. E., Sunshine, J. H., & Siegelman, S. S. (2008). The use of CT for screening: A national survey of radiologists’ activities and attitudes. Radiology, 248(1), 160–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brawley, O. W., & Kramer, B. S. (2005). Cancer screening in theory and in practice. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(2), 293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palda, V. A., Davis, D., & Goldman, J. (2007). A guide to the Canadian medical association handbook on clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ, 177(10), 1221–1226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bach, P. B., Silvestri, G. A., Hanger, M., & Jett, J. R. (2007). Screening for lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest, 132(3 Suppl), 69S–77S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., Brooks, D., Saslow, D., & Brawley, O. W. (2010). Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American cancer society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin, 60(2), 99–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The analysis presented in this article was led by the lead author in part to fulfill the practicum portion of her MPH degree. Research Triangle Institute (RTI), Durham, NC assisted with protocol development, performed the sample selection, conducted the focus groups, and prepared transcripts. Funding support was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (contract number 200-2002-00575). The authors would like to express their appreciation to the study participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Henderson.

Additional information

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henderson, S., DeGroff, A., Richards, T.B. et al. A Qualitative Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Practices by Primary Care Physicians. J Community Health 36, 949–956 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9394-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9394-2

Keywords

Navigation