Abstract
This study assessed the degree to which local health departments (LHDs) are preparing to replace retiring top executives. Questionnaires were sent to all 134 local health departments in Ohio. It is typical of many states in terms of the organization of LHDs. Ninety-two LHD top executives responded. The questionnaire addressed aspects of departmental succession planning and demographic parameters of their departments. Approximately half (51.7%) of responding LHD top executives rated having succession plans as being important. Overall, local boards of health are not very concerned about actually having a succession plan. One in four (27.6%) local health departments reported that they have succession plans. Half of those were grooming a successor. Succession planning is not a high priority among the majority of LHDs, despite the fact that 43.7% of top executives reported planning to leave their current position within six years. Experienced and continuous LHD leadership is important for strong responses to public health crises like major disease outbreaks and natural disasters. Having a succession plan in place that identifies how leadership voids are filled can help minimize risks to populations in an emergency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rothwell WJ (2005) Effective succession planning, 3rd ed. AMACOM Books, New York, pp. 7–59
Caudron S (1999) The looming leadership crisis. Workforce 78:72–76
Howard A (2001) The nature of organizational leadership: understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 305–346
Frauenheim E (2006) Succession progression. Workforce 85:31–34
Lorsch JW, Khurana R (1999) Changing leaders: the board’s role in CEO succession. Harv Bus Rev 77:96–105
Garman AN, Glawe J (2004) Succession planning. Consult Psychol J: Pract–Res 56:119–128
Greenwald S (2001) Why succession planning can’t wait. Workforce 80:34–38
Annie E. Casey Foundation. Change ahead: nonprofit executive leadership and transitions survey. Baltimore; 2004
Health Research and Service Administration, Bureau of Health Professions. Public health workforce study. [Online]. 2006 [cited 2006 Feb 22];[17screens]. Available from: URL:www.bhp.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/publichealth/
National Association of County & City Health Officials. 2005 National profile of local health departments. Washington DC; July, 2006
Turnock BJ (2006) Public health: career choices that make a difference. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, pp. 57–71
Lucier C, Schuyt R, Tse E. CEO succession: the world’s most prominent temp workers. Strategy+Business [serial online] Sum 2005 [cited 2006 Aug 28] [10 screens]. Available from: URL:http://www.strategy-business.com/press/article/05204?pg=0
Ram C (2005) Ending the CEO succession crisis. Harv Bus Rev 83:67–72
American College of Healthcare Executives. CEO succession planning in freestanding U.S. hospitals. Chicago; Oct. 27, 2004
Hall H. Planning successful successions. The Chronicle of Philanthropy [Online] 2006 Jan 12 [cited August 28] [1 screen]. Available from: URL:http://philanthropy.com/free/articles/v18/i06/06000601.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmalzried, H., Fallon, L.F. Succession Planning For Local Health Department Top Executives: Reducing Risk To Communities. J Community Health 32, 169–180 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-006-9044-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-006-9044-2