Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gambling, Substance Use and Violence in Male and Female Adolescents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study systematically examined the link between history of gambling, and substance-use and violence-related measures in male and female adolescents, and compared association differences between genders in representative youth risk behavior surveillance data. An anonymous survey was administered to 2425 9th- to 12th-grade students in the state of Connecticut to assess risk behaviors that impact health. Reported past-12-months gambling was the independent variable of interest. Chi squares and adjusted odds-ratios were computed to determine gambling associations with demographic variables, substance-use, and violence-related measures, and whether associations were different between genders. Among students, 18.6% reported gambling. Reported gambling in males and females associated with lifetime use of any drugs, marijuana, cocaine, inhalants, heroin, methamphetamines, ecstasy, synthetic marijuana, non-medical pain-relievers, and injected drugs, in addition to past-30-days cigarette smoking, alcohol and heavy alcohol drinking, and marijuana use. Gambling associated with reported weapon-carrying, being threatened or injured with a weapon, forced sexual intercourse, bullying, and electronic bullying in males; physical dating violence in females; and physical fighting and sexual dating violence in both groups. Gambling and gender interaction terms did not associate with outcome measures except synthetic marijuana use, which trended towards significance (P = 0.052). Gambling in adolescence was similarly linked to risk behaviors involving substance-use in males and females, though gambling relationships with different violence-measures varied between genders. Assessing gambling behavior may be important for targeted preventions focused on adolescents at risk for substance-use disorder and physical violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Connecticut Mental Health Center, the Connecticut State Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling, and a Center of Excellence in Gambling Research Award from the National Center for Responsible Gaming. The funding agencies had no role in data collection or analysis or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. We thank Ms. Celeste Jorge, MPH, and the State of Connecticut for facilitating access to the YRBS data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Drs. ZWZ and MNP designed the study. Dr. ZWZ and Ms. GLD conducted analyses and worked with Dr. MNP to develop initial drafts of the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback with respect to the content of the manuscript. All authors had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc N. Potenza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest with respect to the content of this manuscript. Dr. Potenza has received financial support or compensation for the following: he has consulted for RiverMend Health, Game Day Data, the Addiction Policy Forum, and Opiant Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from Mohegan Sun Casino and the National Center for Responsible Gaming; and has consulted for gambling and legal entities on issues related to addictive disorders. The views presented in this manuscript represent those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.

Informed Consent

All participants gave informed consent.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Yale Human Investigation Committee: 2000023801) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The research activity qualifies as exempt from review by the Connecticut Department of Public Health’s Human Investigation Committee under federal guidelines 45 CFR 46.101 (b) (7): (4) Research that involves the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified directly or through identifiers linked to the subject.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, Z.W., Duenas, G.L., Wampler, J. et al. Gambling, Substance Use and Violence in Male and Female Adolescents. J Gambl Stud 36, 1301–1324 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09931-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09931-8

Keywords

Navigation