Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive Distortions in Gamblers and Non-gamblers of a Representative Spanish Sample

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive biases or distortions related to gambling, present in all people, are considered a relevant factor in the development of gambling-related problems. Objective: to establish whether the presence of these biases or cognitive distortions, in gamblers and non-gamblers, is related to the presence of gambling problems. Method: 3000 people aged 18–81 years, representative of the Spanish adult population, underwent a structured survey. Results: the presence of distortions was relevant to distinguish gamblers according to their level of gambling engagement and problems. There is a constant and significant tendency to have more cognitive distortions as gambling problems increase. But not all distortions have the same ability to distinguish between the different groups of gamblers. The results seem to group gamblers into three groups according to the presence of cognitive distortions, from less to more: (1) non-gamblers, (2) low-risk and at-risk gamblers, and (3) problem and pathological gamblers. The relevance of this research and its practical implications for both treatment and prevention work is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrault, S., & Varescon, I. (2013). Impulsive sensation seeking and gambling practice among a sample of online poker players: Comparison between non pathological, problem and pathological gamblers. Personality and Individual Differences,55(5), 502–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becoña, E. (2004). Prevalencia del juego patológico en Galicia mediante el NODS. ¿Descenso de la prevalencia o mejor evaluación del trastorno? [Prevalence of pathological gambling in Galicia according to the NODS. Decreased prevalence or better evaluation of the disorder?]. Adicciones,16, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden-Jones, H., & Sanju, G. (Eds.). (2015). A clinician’s guide to working with problem gamblers. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. (2014). Disordered gambling: The evolving concept of behavioral addiction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1327, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Lawrence, A. J., Astley-Jones, F., & Gray, N. (2009). Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron,61(3), 481–490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Studer, B., Bruss, J., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2014). Damage to insula abolishes cognitive distortions during simulated gambling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(16), 6098–6103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cosenza, M., Baldassarre, I., Matarazzo, O., & Nigro, G. (2014). Youth at stake: Alexithymia, cognitive distortions, and problem gambling in late adolescents. Cognitive Computation,6(4), 652–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, M. E., Stewart, S. H., Salmon, J., Collins, P., Al-Hamdani, M., Boffo, M., et al. (2017). Distorted beliefs about luck and skill and their relation to gambling problems and gambling behavior in Dutch gamblers. Frontiers in Psychology,8, 2245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (2000). Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. The Journal of psychology,134(2), 117–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2007). Adolescent gambling: Current knowledge, myths, assessment strategies, and public policy implications. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgings, & R. J. Wlliams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 437–463). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, M. A., Chiesi, F., Iozzi, A., Manfredi, A., Fagni, F., & Primi, C. (2018). Gambling-related distortions and problem gambling in adolescents: A model to explain mechanisms and develop interventions. Frontiers in Psychology,8, 2243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Echeburúa, E., Amor, P. J., & Gómez, M. (2017). Current psychological therapeutic approaches for gambling disorder with psychiatric comorbidities: A narrative review. Salud Mental,40(6), 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein, D. R., Murphy, S. A., Toce, M. T., Hoffmann, J., Palmer, A., Johnson, R. A., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(6), 1110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,22(3), 228–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodie, A. S., & Fortune, E. E. (2013). Measuring cognitive distortions in pathological gambling: Review and meta-analyses. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,27(3), 730–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahmann, T. E. (2016). Moderate-risk and problem slot machine gamblers: A typology of gambling-related cognitions. Journal of Gambling Issues,34, 140–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardoon, K. K., Baboushkin, H. R., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2001). Underlying cognitions in the selection of lottery tickets. Journal of Clinical Psychology,57(6), 749–763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., & Holuv, A. (2007). Treatment of problem gambling. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgings, & R. J. Wlliams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 371–397). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, R. J., Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2010). Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,34(1), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keren, G., & Wagenaar, W. A. (1985). On the psychology of playing blackjack. Normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrador, F. J. (2010). Sesgos cognitivos de los jugadores patológicos: Implicaciones terapéuticas [Cognitive biases of pathological gamblers: Therapeutic implications]. In E. Echeburua, E. Becoña, & F. J. Labrador (Eds.), El juego patológico: Avances en la clínica y en el tratamiento [Pathological gambling: Advances in the clinic and treatment] (pp. 164–192). Madrid: Pirámide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrador, F. J., Bernaldo de Quirós, M., Estupiñá, F. J., García-Fernández, G. & Labrador, M. (2014). Conductas adictivas (Addictive behaviors). In L. Ezpeleta & J. Toro (Eds.), Psicopatología del desarrollo (Psychopathology of the development). (pp. 519–545). Madrid: Pirámide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrador, F. J., & Labrador, M. (2016). El papel de las cogniciones en los juegos de azar: Distorsiones o sesgos cognitivos [The role of cognitions in gaming: Cognitive distortions or biases]. In E. Echeburúa (Ed.), Abuso de internet ¿Antesala para la adicción al juego online? [Internet abuse: A prelude to online gambling addiction?] (pp. 191–239). Madrid: Pirámide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrador, F. J., Mañoso, V., & Fernández, A. (2008). Distorsiones cognitivas y resultado del tratamiento en el juego patológico [Cognitive distortions and treatment outcome in pathological gambling]. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy,8, 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R. (2004). Perceptions among pathological and nonpathological gamblers. Addictive Behaviors,29(3), 555–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Paquet, C., & Dubé, D. (1996). Erroneous perceptions in generating secuences of random events. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,26(24), 2157–2166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, C. A., & Williams, R. J. (2016). The relationship between gambling fallacies and problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,30(6), 694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, T. L., & Hodgins, D. C. (2012). Cognitive distortions as a problem gambling risk factor in Internet gambling. International Gambling Studies,12(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLaren, V. V., Fugelsang, J. A., Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. J. (2012). Effects of impulsivity, reinforcement sensitivity, and cognitive style on pathological gambling symptoms among frequent slot machine players. Personality and Individual Differences,52(3), 390–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmurek, H. H. (2018). A dissociation of impulsivity and gambling cognition pathways to gambling urges via motivation. Addiction Clinical Research,2(1), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, S., Barrault, S., Brunault, P., & Varescon, I. (2018). Gambling motives: Do they explain cognitive distortions in male poker gamblers? Journal of Gambling Studies,34(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9700-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalczuk, R., Bowden-Jones, H., Verdejo-Garcia, A., & Clark, L. (2011). Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: A preliminary report. Psychological Medicine,41(12), 2625–2635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G. S., & Eidem, M. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of Gambling Studies,26(4), 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savoie, D., & Ladouceur, R. (1995). Évaluation et modification de conceptions erronées au sujet des loteries [Evaluation and modification of erroneous conceptions about lottery gambling]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement,27(2), 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurrier, M., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). Risk perception in gambling: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies,30(2), 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. K., & Wu, A. M. (2012). Gambling-related cognitive biases and pathological gambling among youths, young adults, and mature adults in Chinese societies. Journal of Gambling Studies,28(1), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tani, F., Gori, A., & Ponti, I. (2018). Cognitive distortions and gambling behaviors: Which comes first? Analyzing the relationship between superstitious beliefs and pathological gambling. Clinical Neuropsychiatry,15(2), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toce-Gerstein, M., Gerstein, D. R., & Volberg, R. A. (2009). The NODS-CLiP: A rapid screen for adult pathological and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies,22(4), 541–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toneatto, T. (2002). Cognitive Therapy for problem gambling. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice,9, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R., & Tsanos, A. (1997). Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies,13(3), 253–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., Munck, I. M., & Petry, N. M. (2011). A quick and simple screening method for pathological and problem gamblers in addiction programs and practices. American Journal on Addictions,20(3), 220–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed by the Sociedad Española de Apuestas y Loterias del Estado (Betting and Lotteries Spanish State Society).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study design, analysis, and interpretation of data. The first author wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Labrador.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work has been approved by the deontological committee of Faculty of Psychology of the Complutense University of Madrid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labrador, M., Labrador, F.J., Crespo, M. et al. Cognitive Distortions in Gamblers and Non-gamblers of a Representative Spanish Sample. J Gambl Stud 36, 207–222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09870-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09870-z

Keywords

Navigation