Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gambling Motives in a Representative Swedish Sample of Risk Gamblers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motives for gambling have been shown to be associated with gambling involvement, and hence important in the understanding of the etiology of problem gambling. The aim of this study was to describe differences in gambling motives in different subgroups of lifetime risk gamblers, categorized by: age, gender, alcohol- and drug habits and type of game preferred, when considering the level of risk gambling. A random Swedish sample (n = 19,530) was screened for risk gambling, using the Lie/Bet questionnaire. The study sample (n = 257) consisted of the respondents screening positive on Lie/Bet and completing a postal questionnaire about gambling and motives for gambling (measured with the NODS-PERC and the RGQ respectively). When considering the level of risk gambling, motives for gambling were not associated with gender, whereas younger persons gambled for the challenge more often than did older participants. Card/Casino and Sport gamblers played to a greater extent for social and challenge reasons then did Lotto/Bingo-gamblers. EGM-gamblers played more for coping reasons than did Lotto/Bingo gamblers. However, this association turned non-significant when considering the level of risk gambling. Moderate risk gamblers played for the challenge and coping reasons to a greater extent than low risk gamblers motives for gambling differ across subgroups of preferred game and between gamblers with low and moderate risk. The level of risk gambling is intertwined with motives for gambling and should be considered when examining gambling reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balodis, S. R. S., Thomas, A. C., & Moore, S. M. (2014). Sensitivity to reward and punishment: Horse race and EGM gamblers compared. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 29–33. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binde, P. (2009). Gambling motivation and involvement: A review of social science research. Swedish National Institute of Public Health.

  • Binde, P. (2013). Why people gamble: A model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies, 13(1), 81–97. doi:10.1080/14459795.2012.712150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathway model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 97(5), 487–499. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boman, U., Engdahl, B., Gustafsson, N.-K., Hradilova Selin, K., & Ramstedt, M. (2006). Alkoholkonsumtionen i Sverige fram till år 2005. Stockholm. Retrieved from http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:513943.

  • Bonnaire, C., Bungener, C., & Varescon, I. (2006). Pathological gambling and sensation seeking–How do gamblers playing games of chance in cafés differ from those who bet on horses at the racetrack? Addiction Research and Theory, 14(6), 619–629. doi:10.1080/16066350600964296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canale, N., Santinello, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015a). Validation of the reasons for gambling questionnaire (RGQ) in a British population survey. Addictive Behaviors, 45, 276–280. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canale, N., Vieno, A., Griffiths, M. D., Rubaltelli, E., Santinello, M., Canale, N., et al. (2015b). How do impulsivity traits influence problem gambling through gambling motives? The role of perceived gambling risk/benefits. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(3), 813–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2005). Motivational differences between slot machine and lottery players 1, 2. Psychological Reports, 96(3), 843–848. doi:10.2466/pr0.96.3.843-848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. L., Russell, M., Skinner, J. B., & Windle, M. (1992). Development and validation of a three-dimensional measure of drinking motives. Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 123–132. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.2.123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, H., & Blake, M. (2009). Development of questions for a longitudinal study of gambling: Phase 2 report. Findings from cognitive question testing (April). Retrieved from http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/research__consultations/research/research_programme/questionnaire_longitudinal_ph2.aspx.

  • Dowling, N. (2013). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of disordered gambling (West Susse, pp. 225–250). John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

  • Fang, X., & Mowen, J. C. (2009). Examining the trait and functional motive antecedents of four gambling activities: Slot machines, skilled card games, sports betting, and promotional games. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 121–131. doi:10.1108/07363760910940483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, K. L., Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., Christensen, D. R., & Wardle, H. (2014). Gambling motives: Application of the reasons for gambling questionnaire in an Australian population survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 807–823. doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9458-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götestam, K. G., Johansson, A., Wenzel, H. G., & Simonsen, I.-E. (2004). Validation of the lie/bet screen for pathological gambling on two normal population data sets. Psychological Reports, 95(3 Pt 1), 1009–1013. doi:10.2466/pr0.95.3.1009-1013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R., Nora, R. M., Tan, B., Eisenstein, N., & Engelhart, C. (1997). The lie/bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychological Reports, 80, 83–88. doi:10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3f.1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, L., Mackinnon, S. P., & Stewart, S. H. (2014). Validation of the gambling motives questionnaire in emerging adults. Journal of Gambling Studies/Co-Sponsored by the National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming. doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9467-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K., Lee, B., Bernhard, B. J., & Tae, K. L. (2009). A comparative study of involvement and motivation among casino gamblers. Psychiatry Investigation, 6(3), 141–149. doi:10.4306/pi.2009.6.3.141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, D. S., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., & Barrett, S. P. (2010). Self-generated motives for gambling in two population-based samples of gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 10(2), 117–138. doi:10.1080/14459795.2010.499915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G., Fiebig, M., Häfeli, J., & Mörsen, C. (2011). Development of an assessment tool to evaluate the risk potential of different gambling types. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 221–236. doi:10.1080/14459795.2011.584890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platz, L., & Millar, M. (2001). Gambling in the context of other recreation activity: A quantitative comparison of casual and pathological student gamblers. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(4), 383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Problem Gambling Research Treatment Centre (PGRTC). (2011). Guideline for screening, assessment and treatment in problem gambling. Melbourne: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramstedt, M. (2010). How much alcohol do you buy? A comparison of self-reported alcohol purchases with actual sales. Addiction, 105, 649–654. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02839.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raninen, J., Leifman, H., & Ramstedt, M. (2013). Who is not drinking less in Sweden? An analysis of the decline in consumption for the period 2004–2011. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 48(5), 592–597. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agt051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Statens Folkhälsoinstitut. (2010). Spel om pengar och spelproblem i Sverige 2009/2010.

  • Stewart, S. H., & Zack, M. (2008). Development and psychometric evaluation of a three-dimensional gambling motives questionnaire. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 103(7), 1110–1117. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02235.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist, K., & Wennberg, P. (2014). Risk gambling and personality: Results from a representative Swedish sample. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9473-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104, 250–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. J., Hinch, T. D., & Weighill, A. J. (2005). Inter- and intra-gender similarities and differences in motivations for casino gambling. Leisure Sciences, 27(2), 111–130. doi:10.1080/01490400590912042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, H., Dobbie, F., Kerr, J., & Reith, G. (2009). Questionnaire development for a longitudinal study of gamblers: Phase 1 report (April), 1–69.

  • Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., Hann, R. G., Schopflocher, D., West, B., McLaughlin, P., White, N., et al. (2015). Quinte longitudinal study of gambling and problem gambling. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Gemini Research. Retrieved from http://www.uleth.ca/dspace/handle/10133/3068.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by Svenska Spel’s Research Council. We are grateful for valuable comments on the manuscript by Professor Jan Blomqvist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD), Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

    Kristina Sundqvist & Peter Wennberg

  2. Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jakob Jonsson

Authors
  1. Kristina Sundqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jakob Jonsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Wennberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Sundqvist.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

The study has been approved by the regional ethics committee. The participants have given informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sundqvist, K., Jonsson, J. & Wennberg, P. Gambling Motives in a Representative Swedish Sample of Risk Gamblers. J Gambl Stud 32, 1231–1241 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9607-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9607-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation