Abstract
It is possible that the growth and promotion of online gambling will result in substantially increased use of these types of games in countries where they are legal. This may be especially true for young people due to their interest in such games. In this context, it is important to note that online gambling is more addictive than any other type of game due its structural characteristics, such as immediacy, accessibility, ease of betting, and so on. This study examined the effect of online gambling in Spain 2 years after its legalization. The sample included 1277 pathological gamblers in recovery at 26 gambling addiction treatment centers. Our results showed a significant increase in young pathological gamblers since the legalization of this activity. This is a very relevant issue because, as in the case of Spain, many countries are currently in process of legalization of many types of online games. Scientific research can be useful to adapt the adequate gambling policies in order to prevent the gambling addiction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling in the community: An international overview and critique. Report number one of the New Zealand Gaming Survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.
Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., Bellringer, M., & Reith, G. (2004). A review of research aspects of problem gambling. London: Responsibility in Gambling Trust.
APA, American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Balodis, S. R. S., Thomas, A. C., & Moore, S. M. (2013). Sensitivity to reward and punishment: Horse race and EGM gamblers compared. Personality and Individual Differences. E-publication ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.015
Binde, P. (2011). What are the more harmful forms of gambling? Analyzing problem gambling prevalence surveys. Göteborg: CEFOS Working Paper 12.
Binde, P. (2013). Why people gamble: A model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies, 13, 81–97.
Blaszczynski, A., Collins, P., Fong, D., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., Shaffer, H. J., et al. (2011). Responsible gambling: General principles and minimal requirements. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 565–573.
Chóliz, M. (2010). Experimental analysis of the game in pathological gamblers: Effect of the immediacy or the reward in slot machines. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 249–256.
Chóliz, M. (2014). Ethical gambling: A commitment to preventing gambling addiction from the political and social standpoints. Revista Española de Drogodependencias, 39, 10–13. Retrieved from: www.aesed.com/descargas/revistas/v39n4_editorial2.pdf
DGOJ, General Directorate of Gambling Regulation. (2014). Memoria anual 2013. Ministerio de Hacienda. http://www.ordenacionjuego.es/es/estudios-informes
Echeburúa, E., González-Ortega, I., Corral, P., & Polo-López, R. (2011). Clinical gender differences among adult pathological gamblers seeking treatment: An exploratory study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 215–227.
Griffiths, M. D. (2002). Gambling and gaming addictions in adolescence. Leicester: British Psychological Society/Blackwells.
Griffiths, M. D. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns and recommendations. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 557–568.
Griffiths, M. D., Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2009). Problem gambling: A European perspective. In G. Meyer, T. Hayer, & M. D. Griffiths (Eds.), Problem gaming in Europe: Challenges, prevention, and interventions (pp. xix–xxix). New York: Springer.
Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: An overview of psychosocial impacts. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 10, 27–39.
Hing, N., & Haw, J. (2009). The development of a multi-dimensional gambling accessibility scale. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 569–581.
LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 347–362.
Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Gender differences among pathological gamblers seeking treatment. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 10, 302–309.
McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2009). Internet gambling behavior in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental & Health Addiction, 7, 149–167.
Meyer, G., Fiebig, M., Hafeli, J., & Morsen, C. (2011). Development of an assessment tool to evaluate the risk potential of different gambling types. International Gambling Studies, 11, 221–236.
Monaghan, S. (2009). Internet gambling—Not just a fad. International Gambling Studies, 9, 1–4.
Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2007). The role of structural characteristics in gambling. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 217–249). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Petry, N. M. (2006a). Should the scope of addictive behaviors be broadened to include pathological gambling? Addiction, 101, 152–160.
Petry, N. M. (2006b). Internet gambling: An emerging concern in family practice medicine? Family Practice, 23, 421–426.
Potenza, M. N. (2006). Should addictive disorders include non-substance related conditions? Addiction, 101, 142–151.
Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2004). Role of culture in gambling and problem gambling. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1087–1114.
Smith, A. D., & Rupp, W. T. (2005). Service marketing aspects associated with the allure of e-gambling. Services Marketing Quarterly, 26, 83–103.
Storer, J., Abbott, M., & Stubbs, J. (2009). Access or adaptation? A meta-analysis of surveys of problem gambling prevalence in Australia and New Zealand with respect to concentration of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 9, 225–244.
Tanioka, I. (2000). Pachinko and the Japanese society. Osaka, Japan: Osaka University of Commerce.
Thomas, A. C., Sullivan, G. B., & Allen, F. C. L. (2008). A theoretical model of EGM problem gambling: More than a cognitive escape. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. doi:10.1007/s11469-008-9152-6.
Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2007). Type of gambling and availability as risk factors for problem gambling: A Tobit regression analysis by age and gender. International Gambling Studies, 7, 183–198.
Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2007). The proportion of Ontario gambling revenue derived from problem gamblers. Canadian Public Policy, 33, 367–387.
Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2007a). Problem gambling on the Internet: Implications for Internet gambling policy in North America. New Media & Society, 9, 520–542.
Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2007b). Internet gambling: Past, present and future. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 486–502). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2009). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Final Report to the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/693
Wood, R. T., Williams, R. J., & Parke, J. (2012). The relationship between problem gambling and Internet gambling. In R. J. Williams, R. T. Wood, & J. Parke (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of Internet gambling (pp. 200–211). London: Routledge.
Acknowledgments
I have not any funding by part of companies. This research has not any commercial interest. This work has been possible by the agreement between the Spanish Federation of Gamblers in Recovery (FEJAR) and the University of Valencia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chóliz, M. The Challenge of Online Gambling: The Effect of Legalization on the Increase in Online Gambling Addiction. J Gambl Stud 32, 749–756 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9558-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9558-6