Skip to main content
Log in

Near Misses in Slot Machine Gambling Developed Through Generalization of Total Wins

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the development of the near miss effect in slot machine gambling as a product of stimulus generalization from total wins. The study was conducted across two experiments. Twelve college students participated in the first experiment, which demonstrated that greater post-reinforcement pauses followed losing outcomes that were formally similar to total wins, relative to losing outcomes that were formally dissimilar [F (5, 7) = 5.24, p = .025] along a generalization gradient (R 2 = .96). Additionally, 11 out of 12 participants showed greater response latencies following near-misses than following total wins. Thirteen college students participated in the second experiment, which demonstrated that symbols that more saliently indicated a loss resulted in lower response latencies than functionally equivalent but visually dissimilar losing symbols [F (3, 10) = 15.50, p = .01]. A generalization gradient was observed across winning symbols (R 2 = .98), and an inverse of the gradient observed across winning symbols was observed across symbols that were the least formally similar (R 2 = .69). The present study replicates and extends previous research on near misses in slot machine gambling, and provides discussion around the clinical utility of such findings on the prevention of problem gambling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M. W. (2001). Problem and non-problem gamblers in New Zealand: A report on phase two of the 1999 national prevalence survey. Report number six of the New Zealand gaming surve. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., Khazaal, Y., Zullino, D., & Clark, L. (2012). Trait gambling cognitions predict near-miss experiences and persistence in laboratory slot machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 412–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the inference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 80–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. (2010). Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 365, 319–330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Crooks, B., Clarke, R., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dunn, B. D. (2011). Physiological responses to near-miss outcomes and personal control during simulated gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28, 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Lawrence, A. J., Astley-Jones, F., & Gray, N. (2009). Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron, 61, 481–490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, D., Caron, A., Aubert, J., Desrochers, V., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Near miss prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(4), 433–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. J., MacLaren, V., Jarick, M., Fugelsang, J. A., & Harrigan, K. A. (2012). The frustrating effects of just missing the jackpot: Slot machine near-misses trigger large skin conductance responses, but no post reinforcement pauses. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9333-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., & MacLin, O. H. (2003). Visual basic 2005 for psychologists. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Utilizing a computerized video poker simulation for the collection of data on gambling behavior. The Psychological Record, 52, 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players. The Psychological Record, 45, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, M., & Lyon, D. O. (1966). The post reinforcement pause. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9(2), 131–134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R., & Sigurdsson, V. (2012). When loss rewards: The near-miss effect in slot machine gambling. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 6, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirlanda, S., & Enquist, M. (2003). A century of generalization. Animal Behaviour, 66(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1991). Psychobiology of the near-miss in fruit machine gambling. Journal of Psychology, 125, 347–357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, R., & Dixon, M. R. (2010). Neurobehavioral evidence for the “near-miss” effect in pathological gamblers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 313–328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2010). Government sanctioned “tight” and “loose” slot machines: How having multiple versions of the same slot machine game may impact problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 159–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1977). Negative reinforcement and avoidance. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoon, A., Dymond, S., Jackson, J. W., & Dixon, M. R. (2008). Contextual control of slot-machine gambling: replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 467–470.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kassinove, H. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the near-miss and the big win on persistence at slot-machine gambling. Psychology and Addictive Behavior, 15, 155–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., & Walker, M. (1996). A cognitive perspective on gambling. In P. M. Salkavskis (Ed.), Trends in cognitive and behavioural therapies. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The south oaks gambling screening (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., & Dixon, M. R. (2004). A computerized simulation for investigating gambling behavior during roulette play. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(1), 96–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., Daugherty, D., & Small, S. L. (2007). Using a computer simulation of three slot machines to investigate a gambler’s preference among varying densities of near-miss alternatives. Behavioral Research Methods, 39(2), 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., & Hayes, L. J. (1999). A computerized slot machine simulation to investigate the variables involved in gambling behavior. Behavior Research Methods, 31(4), 731–734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nastally, B. L., & Dixon, M. R. (2012). The effect of a brief acceptance and commitment therapy intervention on the near miss effect in problem gamblers. Psychological Record, 62(4), 677–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parke, A., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Gambling addiction and the evolution of the “near-miss”. Addiction Research and Therapy, 12, 407–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H., Hunt, M., & Harper, D. (2010). An animal model of slot machine gambling: The effect of structural characteristics on response latency and persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 521–531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potenza, M. N. (2014). The neural bases of cognitive processes in gambling disorder. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 429–438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schull, N. D. (2012). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2001). Temporal characteristics of behavior on random-ratio schedules observed during slot machine play. Psychological Reports, 89, 67–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Appleton Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan Belisle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belisle, J., Dixon, M.R. Near Misses in Slot Machine Gambling Developed Through Generalization of Total Wins. J Gambl Stud 32, 689–706 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9554-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9554-x

Keywords

Navigation