Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Overestimation Phenomenon in a Skill-Based Gaming Context: The Case of March Madness Pools

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over 100 million people are estimated to take part in the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament Championship bracket contests. However, relatively little is known about consumer behavior in skill-based gaming situations (e.g., sports betting). In two studies, we investigated the overestimation phenomenon in the “March Madness” context. In Study 1 (N = 81), we found that individuals who were allowed to make their own predictions were significantly more optimistic about their performance than individuals who did not make their own selections. In Study 2 (N = 197), all subjects participated in a mock competitive bracket pool. In line with the illusion of control theory, results showed that higher self-ratings of probability of winning significantly increased maximum willingness to wager but did not improve actual performance. Lastly, perceptions of high probability of winning significantly contributed to consumers’ enjoyment and willingness to participate in a bracket pool in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allcock, C. (1987). An analysis of a successful racing system. In M. Walker (Ed.), Faces of gambling (pp. 181–187). Sydney: National Association for Gambling Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, P., Edman, J., & Ekman, M. (2005). Predicting the World Cup 2002 in soccer: Performance and confidence of experts and non-experts. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(3), 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayeroff, F., & Abelson, R. P. (1976). ESP and ESB: Belief in personal success at mental telepathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2), 240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3(4), 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantinotti, M., Ladouceur, R., & Jacques, C. (2004). Sports betting: Can gamblers beat randomness? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(2), 143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, A. W., & Phillips, J. G. (1995). Effects of perceived control upon wagering and attributions in computer blackjack. The Journal of General Psychology, 122(3), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, E. (2013). Forgetting the anxiety: Gambler’s reactions to outcome uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1591–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crupi, A. (2011, March 1). March Madness still one of the biggest sports franchises. Ad Week. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/news/television/march-madness-still-one-biggest-sports-franchises-1258890

  • d’Astous, A., & Gaspero, M. D. (2013). Explaining the performance of online sports bettors. International Gambling Studies, 13(3), 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. S., & Wilson, T. D. (1990). When the stakes are high: A limit to the illusion-of-control effect. Social Cognition, 8(3), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, S. P., & Dollinger, S. J. (1990). Model competence, depression, and the illusion of control. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(3), 235–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 968–980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2002). Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sport: The case of English soccer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 51(2), 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, E. C., & Edell, J. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1995). Towards a risk factor model of fruit machine addiction: A brief note. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11(3), 343–346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(4), 319–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., & Makarchuk, K. (2003). Trusting problem gamblers: Reliability and validity of self-reported gambling behavior. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(3), 244–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, A. (2014, January 17). The business of the bracket: How Vegas and businesses capitalize on March Madness. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/aliciajessop/2013/03/20/the-business-of-the-bracket-how-vegas-and-businesses-capitalize-on-march-madness/

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, D. H., Lee, J. S., & Mahan, J. E, I. I. I. (2013). Ad-evoked illusory judgments in fantasy sports participation: Effects of customization level and expert information. Journal of Sport Management, 27(5), 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, D. H., Lim, C. H., Lee, W. Y., & Mahan, J, I. I. I. (2010). How confident are you to win your fantasy league: Exploring the antecedents and consequences of winning expectancy. Journal of Sport Management, 24(4), 416–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R. (2004). Perceptions among pathological and nonpathological gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 29(3), 555–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Giroux, I., & Jacques, C. (1998). Winning on the horses: How much strategy and knowledge are needed? The Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., & Sévigny, S. (2005). Structural characteristics of video lotteries: Effects of a stopping device on illusion of control and gambling persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(2), 117–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D. (2007). An exploratory study of gambling motivations and their impact on the purchase frequencies of various gambling products. Psychology & Marketing, 24(9), 815–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. H., Hung, H. H., & Li, Y. H. (2012). How confidence and uncertainty affect consumers’ enjoyment of gambling. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(3), 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, A. (2013, March 21). Going for a perfect NCAA bracket? You’re more likely to win Powerball. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/business/careers/going-perfect-ncaa-bracket-youre-more-likely-win-powerball-f1C8981570

  • Mandel, N., & Nowlis, S. M. (2008). The effect of making a prediction about the outcome of a consumption experience on the enjoyment of that experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matute, H., & Blanco, F. (2014). Reducing the illusion of control when an action is followed by an undesired outcome. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1087–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. (2012, March 27). March Madness betting now tops Super Bowl. USA Today. Retrieved from http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gameon/post/2012/03/march-madness-betting-bigger-than-super-bowl-ncaa-las-vegas-nevada-ncaa-mens-final-four/1#.U5XB-vldV8E

  • McCrea, S. M., & Hirt, E. R. (2009). Match Madness: Probability matching in prediction of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2809–2839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(4), 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2002). Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 361–370.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2011). The ‘IKEA effect’: When labor leads to love. Harvard Business School Marketing Unit working paper, (11-091).

  • Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3), 361–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orgaz, C., Estévez, A., & Matute, H. (2013). Pathological gamblers are more vulnerable to the illusion of control in a standard associative learning task. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presson, P. K., & Benassi, V. A. (1996). Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11(3), 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puca, R. M., & Schmalt, H. D. (1999). Task enjoyment: A mediator between achievement motives and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 23(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, J. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2009). In search of value: A model of wagering intentions. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. C., Armstrong, W., & Thomas, C. (1998). Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: A control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 143–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Office of Research at the University of Michigan. The author would like to thank Joon Sung Lee, for his help with data collection and coding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan, 1402 Washington Heights #2118, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA

    Dae Hee Kwak

Authors
  1. Dae Hee Kwak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae Hee Kwak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwak, D.H. The Overestimation Phenomenon in a Skill-Based Gaming Context: The Case of March Madness Pools. J Gambl Stud 32, 107–123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9520-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9520-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation