Skip to main content
Log in

Venue Staff Knowledge of Their Patrons’ Gambling and Problem Gambling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In several jurisdictions around the world, venue staff are encouraged to make reasonable attempts to determine whether patrons may be experiencing problems associated with their gambling. Although a number of visible indicators and behaviours are recognised as being indicative of gambling problems, no research has investigated how effective staff might be in identifying problem gamblers in venues. The aim of this field test was to examine the level of patron familiarity amongst staff working in small to moderate-sized venues. Patrons (n = 303) were asked to complete a short survey including the Problem Gambling Severity Index and venue staff were asked to describe their knowledge of the same patrons independently. The results showed that patrons rated as more at risk by staff scored significantly higher on the PGSI, but that point-in-time staff ratings were not sufficiently accurate to allow effective identification of problem gamblers. The importance of using accumulated information over multiple sessions as well as technological monitoring of behaviour was emphasised by these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As pointed out by an anonymous reviewer, one must be cautious when validating indicators against the results of gambling screens because the content of indicator lists and screens overlap to some degree. It should be pointed out, however, that indicator lists are very extensive and encompass a range of items that is wider than the content of most screens. Problem gamblers in the Schellinck and Schrans (2004) and Delfabbro et al. (2007) studies scored higher on almost all of the indicators, and many of these did not overlap with the screen that was used (the PGSI).

References

  • Allock, C. (2002). Overview of discussion papers. In C. Allcock (Ed.), Current issues related to identifying the problem gambler in the gambling venue. Melbourne: Australasian Gaming Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australasian Gaming Council. (2002). Responsible gaming code: A framework for responsible gaming. Melbourne, Victoria: Australasian Gaming Council.

  • Blaszczynski, A. (2001). Harm minimisation strategies in gambling: An overview of international initiatives and interventions. Canberra: Australasian Gaming Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A. (2002). “Problem gambling behaviours: What can be observed in venues and how should staff respond?” In C. Allcock (Ed.), Current issues related to identifying the problem gambler in the gambling venue. Melbourne: Australasian Gaming Council.

  • Braverman, J., & Shaffer, H. (2010). How do gamblers start gambling: identifying behavioural markers for high-risk Internet gambling. European Journal of Public Health: Advance Access.

  • Breen, H., Bultjens, J., & Hing, N. (2003). The perceived efficacy of responsible gambling strategies in Queensland hotels, casinos and licensed clubs. Brisbane Research and Community Engagement Division of Queensland Treasury.

  • Brown, R. (2000). The harm minimisation strategy: A proposed national responsible gambling policy for New Zealand. Auckland: Problem Gambling Committee of New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Raeburn, J. (2001). Gambling, harm and health: Two perspectives on ways to minimise harm with regard to gambling in New Zealand. Auckland: Problem Gambling Committee of New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. H. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of a limited reduction in electronic gaming availability on perceived gambling behaviour and objective expenditure. International Gambling Studies, 8, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. H., Osborn, A., McMillen, J., Neville, M., & Skelt, L. (2007). The identification of problem gamblers within gaming venues: Final report. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index Final Report. Phase II final report to the Canadian Interprovincial Task Force on Problem Gambling.

  • Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: A survey of attitudes and behaviour among Internet gamblers. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 413–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeli, J., & Schneider, C. (2006). The early detection of problem gamblers in casinos: A new screening instrument. Paper presented at the Asian Pacific Gambling Conference, Hong Kong.

  • Hing, N. (2004). The efficacy of responsible gambling measures in NSW clubs: The gambler’s perspective. Gambling Research, 16, 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., & Dickerson, M. (2002). Responsible gambling: Australian voluntary and mandatory approaches. Canberra: Australian Gambling Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPART. (2004). Gambling: Promoting a culture of responsibility. Sydney, New South Wales: NSW Government.

  • Korn, D., & Shaffer, H. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 289–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). Identifying behavioural markers of disordered Internet sports gambling. Addiction Research and Theory, 19, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R. (2002). Problem gambling behaviours: what can be demonstrated in the venue and how should staff respond? In C. Allcock (Ed.), Current issues related to identifying the problem gambler in the gambling venue. Melbourne: Australasian Gaming Council.

  • Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sevigny, S., & Hamel, D. (2005). Prevalence of pathological gambling in Quebec in 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 451–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R. (2002). Patron behaviour on the casino floor. In C. Allcock (Ed.), Current issues related to identifying the problem gambler in the gambling venue. Melbourne: Australasian Gaming Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, J. (1997). When gambling is a problem—Implications for public health. Consumer Rights Journal, 1, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, J., & Martin, S. (2001). Queensland responsible gambling code of practice: Implementation resource manuals. Final report. Report to Queensland Government Treasury. Australian Institute for Gambling Research, UWS.

  • McMillen, J., & Pitt, S. (2005). Review of the ACT government’s harm minimisation measures. Funded by the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission.

  • McMillen, J., & Toms, M. (1997). Report of the responsible gambling trial program for NSW clubs. Australian Institute for Gambling Research, UWS.

  • Neal, P., Delfabbro, P. H., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Report Commissioned by Gambling Research Australia for the Ministerial Council on Problem Gambling. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Justice.

  • Parke, J., Rigbye, J., & Parke, A. (2008). Cashless and card-based technologies in gambling: A review of the literature. Report prepared for the Australasian Gaming Council.

  • Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Canberra: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2004). Identifying problem gamblers at the gambling venue: Finding combinations of high confidence indicators. Gambling Research, 16, 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schottler Consulting. (2010). Major findings and implications: Player tracking and precommitment trial. Adelaide: S.A. Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuan, Z., & Shaffer, H. (2009). How do gamblers end gambling: Longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviours prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 239–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was made possible by the support of GamingCare SA. The authors in particular are grateful for the co-operation and support of venues who assisted in this project as well as Rhonda Turley and Megan Webb.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Delfabbro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delfabbro, P., Borgas, M. & King, D. Venue Staff Knowledge of Their Patrons’ Gambling and Problem Gambling. J Gambl Stud 28, 155–169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9252-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9252-2

Keywords

Navigation