Skip to main content
Log in

Missouri Casino Self-Excluders: Distributions Across Time and Space

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to public health research, exposure to casinos is a risk factor for disordered gambling. Consequently, casino self-exclusion programs, which provide gamblers with the opportunity to voluntarily seek limits on their access to gambling venues, can serve as a barometer of the concentration of disordered gambling in an area. This study reports on the distribution, both temporally and geographically, of 6,599 people who applied to exclude themselves from Missouri casinos between November, 1996 and February, 2004. Analyses used Microsoft MapPoint to plot the location of casinos and self-excluders (SEs) across Missouri and its constituent counties. These regional exposure analyses showed that the Western region around Kansas City is an epicenter of disordered gambling as, to a lesser extent, is the Eastern region around St. Louis. The annual number of SE enrollments increased during the first few years of the Missouri self-exclusion program and then leveled off during the later years. These findings have important implications for public health and the development of public health interventions for disordered gamblers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Gaming Association (2005). Responsible gaming rules of conduct. Retrieved June 9, 2005, from http://www.americangaming.org/programs/responsiblegaming/code_public.cfm.

  • Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. F. (1987). A general theory of addictions: Application to treatment and rehabilitation planning for pathological gamblers. In T. Galski (Ed.), The handbook of pathological gambling (pp. 169–194). Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.

  • Khantzian, E. J. (1975). Self selection and progression in drug dependence. Psychiatry Digest, 36, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khantzian, E. J. (1985). Psychotherapeutic interventions with substance abusers: The clinical context. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2, 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khantzian, E. J. (1997). The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: A reconsideration and recent applications. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 4(5), 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, D. A. (2000). Expansion of gambling in Canada: Implications for health and social policy. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163(1), 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, D. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(4), 289–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korn, D. A., & Skinner, H. A. (2000, Autumn 2000). Gambling expansion in Canada: An emerging public health issue. CPHA Health Digest, XXIV, 10.

  • Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, W. E., LaBrie, R. A., Lomuto, N., Betjemann, R., & Fournier, E. A. (1999). Measuring interstate variations in drug problems. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 53(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, W. E., LaBrie, R. A., Lomuto, N., Pollock, N., Betjemann, R., & Fournier, E. A. (2000). Measuring interstate variations in problems related to alcohol use disorders. In R. Wilson & M. Dufour (Eds.), The epidemiology of alcohol problems in small geographic areas. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

  • McAuliffe, W. E., LaBrie, R. A., Woodworth, R., Zhang, C., & Dunn, R. P. (2003). State substance abuse treatment gaps. American Journal on Addictions, 12(2), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae, J. A. Jr., Beebe, T. J., & Harrison, P. A. (2001). Estimating the prevalence of substance abuse with social indicators. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(4), 977–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaly K. (2003). Missouri gaming commission fund balance report—Fiscal Year 2003. Kansas City, Missouri: Missouri Gaming Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowatzki, N. R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues. Inernational Gambling Studies, 2, 3–26.

  • O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopoulos, V., O’Neil, D., et al. (2003). Gambling research panel report no. 2: Evaluation of self-exclusion programs (report). South Australian Centre for Economic Studies.

  • Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(5), 564–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Korn, D. A. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A., & LaPlante, D. A. (2004). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: Considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer H. J., LaBrie R. A., LaPlante D. A., & Kidman R. C. (2002). The Iowa Department of public health gambling treatment services: Four years of evidence (No. 101102–200). Boston: Division on Addiction, Harvard Medical School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A., Caro, G., LaPlante, D. A., & Nelson, S. E. (2004). Disordered gambling in Missouri: Regional differences in the need for treatment. Division on Addictions, Harvard Medical School.

  • Skinner, H. A. (1999). Gambling: Achieving the right balance. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(4), 285–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Australian Centre for Economic Studies (2003). Evaluation of self-exclusion programs (Part A: Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria) (No. 2). Victoria, Australia: The Victorian Gambling Research Panel.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (2000). United States Census 2000. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html.

  • Volberg, R. A. (2000). The future of gambling in the United Kingdom: Increasing access creates more problem gamblers. British Medical Journal, 320(7249), 1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Wieczorek, W., Barnes, G., Tidwell, M.-C., & Hoffman, J. (2004). The relationship of ecological and geographic factors to gambling behavior and pathology. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(4), 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zand, D., Cho, D., Malmstrom, T., & Ho, L. (1998). Estimating substance abuse treatment needs using social indicators, 1993–1996 (Final Report). The Missouri Institute of Mental Health, Social Indicators Project Work Group.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Missouri Gaming Commission’s Voluntary Exclusion Program for providing the information for this study, Bryan Nehl at the Missouri Gaming Commission for his help in facilitating the data transfer, Eric Fleegler for his assistance with the geocoding of gambling venues, and Christine Reilly and Christine Thurmond for their effective management of the project. This project was supported, in part, by grants from the Kansas City Community Foundation’s Port Authority Problem Gambling Fund, and the National Center for Responsible Gaming.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. LaBrie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LaBrie, R.A., Nelson, S.E., LaPlante, D.A. et al. Missouri Casino Self-Excluders: Distributions Across Time and Space. J Gambl Stud 23, 231–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9037-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9037-1

Keywords

Navigation