Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous location problems and Big Triangle Small Triangle: constructing better bounds

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Big Triangle Small Triangle method has shown to be a powerful global optimization procedure to address continuous location problems. In the paper published in J. Global Optim. (37:305–319, 2007), Drezner proposes a rather general and effective approach for constructing the bounds needed. Such bounds are obtained by using the fact that the objective functions in continuous location models can usually be expressed as a difference of convex functions. In this note we show that, exploiting further the rich structure of such objective functions, alternative bounds can be derived, yielding a significant improvement in computing times, as reported in our numerical experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blanquero R., Carrizosa E., Conde E.: Finding GM-estimators with global optimization techniques. J. Global Optim. 21, 223–237 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Drezner Z.: A general global optimization approach for solving location problems in the plane. J. Global Optim. 37, 305–319 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Drezner T., Drezner Z.: Finding the optimal solution to the Huff competitive location model. Comput. Manag. Sci. 1, 193–208 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Drezner T., Drezner Z.: Equity models in planar location. Comput. Manag. Sci. 4, 1–16 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drezner Z., Suzuki A.: The Big Triangle Small Triangle method for the solution of nonconvex facility location problems. Oper. Res. 52, 128–135 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drezner Z., Wesolowsky G.O., Drezner T.: The gradual covering problem. Naval Res. Logist. 51, 841–855 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen P., Peeters D., Richard D., Thisse J.-F.: The minisum and minimax location problems revisited. Oper. Res. 33, 1251–1265 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Plastria F.: GBSSS, the generalized big square small square method for planar single facility location. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62, 163–174 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Plastria F.: Continuous location problems. In: Drezner, Z. (eds) Facility location, pp. 225–262. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Blanquero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanquero, R., Carrizosa, E. Continuous location problems and Big Triangle Small Triangle: constructing better bounds. J Glob Optim 45, 389–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-008-9381-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-008-9381-z

Keywords

Navigation