Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global optimization of higher order moments in portfolio selection

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss the global optimization of the higher order moments of a portfolio of financial assets. The proposed model is an extension of the celebrated mean variance model of Markowitz. Asset returns typically exhibit excess kurtosis and are often skewed. Moreover investors would prefer positive skewness and try to reduce kurtosis of their portfolio returns. Therefore the mean variance model (assuming either normally distributed returns or quadratic utility functions) might be too simplifying. The inclusion of higher order moments has therefore been proposed as a possible augmentation of the classical model in order to make it more widely applicable. The resulting problem is non-convex, large scale, and highly relevant in financial optimization. We discuss the solution of the model using two stochastic algorithms. The first algorithm is Differential Evolution (DE). DE is a population based metaheuristic originally designed for continuous optimization problems. New solutions are generated by combining up to four existing solutions plus noise, and acceptance is based on evolutionary principles. The second algorithm is based on the asymptotic behavior of a suitably defined Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE). The SDE consists of three terms. The first term tries to reduce the value of the objective function, the second enforces feasibility of the iterates, while the third adds noise in order to enable the trajectory to climb hills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aluffi-Pentini F., Parisi V. and Zirilli F. (1985). Global optimization and stochastic differential equations. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 47(1): 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arditti F.A. (1967). Risk and required return on equity. J. Finance 22(1): 19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Athayde G. and Flores R. (2003). Incorporating skewness and Kurtosis in portfolio optimization: a multidimensional efficient set. In: Satchell, S. and Scowcroft, A. (eds) Advances in Portfolio Construction and Implementation, pp 243–257. Butterworth-Heinemannpp, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Black F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. J. Finance 45(3): 444–455

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyle, P., Ding, B.: Portfolio selection with skewness. In Breton, M., Ben-Ameur, H., (eds.) Numerical Methods in Finance, GERAD Groupe d’études et de recherche en analyse des décisions. Springer (2005)

  6. Chiang, T.-S., Hwang, C.-R., Sheu, S.J.: Diffusion for global optimization in R n. SIAM J. Control Optim. 25(3),737–753 (1987) ISSN 0363-0129.

  7. Chunhachinda P., Dandapani K., Hamid S. and Prakash A. (1997). Portfolio selection and skewness: evidence from international stock markets. J. Bank. Finance 21: 143–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Friend I. and Westerfield R. (1980). Co-skewness and capital asset pricing. J. Finance 35(4): 897–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geman S. and Hwang C.-R. (1986). Diffusions for global optimization. SIAM J. Control Optim. 24(5): 1031–1043 ISSN 0363-0129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gidas, B.: The Langevin equation as a global minimization algorithm. In: Disordered systems and biological organization (Les Houches, 1985), volume 20 of NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. F Comput. Systems Sci. pp. 321–326 Springer, Berlin (1986)

  11. Jean W.H. (1973). More on multidimensional portfolio analysis. J. Finance Quantit. Anal. 8(3): 475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Konno, H.: Applications of global optimization to portfolio analysis. In: Charles, A., Pierr H., and Gilles, J., (eds.) Essays and Surveys in Global Optimization, pp. 195–210. Springer (2005)

  13. Konno H. and Suzuki K.-I (1995). A mean-variance-skewness portfolio optimization model. J. Operat. Res. Soc. Japan 38(2): 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  14. Konno H., Shirakawa H. and Yamazaki H. (1993). A mean-absolute deviation-skewness portfolio optimization model. Ann. Operat. Res. 45: 205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kraus A. and Litzenberger R.H. (1976). Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. J. Finance 31(4): 1085–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai K.K., Yu L. and Wang S. (2006). Mean-variance-skewness-kurtosis-based portfolio optimization. First International Multi-Symposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences (IMSCCS’06) vol. 2 2: 292–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maranas C.D., Androulakis I.P., Floudas C.A., Berger A.J. and Mulvey J.M. (1997). Solving long-term financial planning problems via global optimization. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 21(8-9): 1405–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maringer, D.: Portfolio management with heuristic optimization. Springer-Verlag (2005)

  19. Maringer, D. Oyewumi, O.: Index tracking with constrained portfolios. To appear in Intell. Syst. Account. Finan. Manage

  20. Markowitz H.M. (1952). Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1): 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parpas, P.: Constrained global optimization and stochastic differential equations. Technical Report, Department of Computing, Imperial College London (2007)

  22. Parpas, P., Rustem, B.: Global optimization of the scenario generation and portfolio selection problems. In: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2006, Proceedings Part III, vol. 3982 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2006)

  23. Parpas P., Rustem B. and Pistikopoulos E.N. (2006). Linearly constrained global optimization and stochastic differential equations. J. Global Optim. 36(2): 191–217 ISSN 0925-5001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prakash A., Chang C. and Pactwa T. (2003). Selecting a portfolio with skewness: recent evidence from US, european, and latin american equity markets. J. Bank. Finance 27: 1375–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Price, K., Storn, R., Lampinen, J.: Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Springer (2005)

  26. Ranaldo, A., Favre, L.: How to price hedge funds: from two- to four-moment capm. Technical report, EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre (2003)

  27. Recchioni M.C. and Scoccia A. (2000). A stochastic algorithm for constrained global optimization. J. Global Optim 16(3): 257–270 ISSN 0925-5001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rom M. and Avriel M. (1989). Properties of the sequential gradient-restoration algorithm (SGRA). II. Convergence analysis. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 62(1): 99–125 ISSN 0022-3239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Spall J.C. (2003). Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  30. Steinbach, M.C.: Markowitz revisited: mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis. SIAM Rev. 43(1), 31–85 (electronic)(2001) ISSN 0036-1445

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stone B. (1973). A linear programming formulation of the general portfolio selection problem. J. Financial Quantit. Anal. 8(4): 621–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Storn R., Price K.: Differential evolution—a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley (1995)

  33. Storn R. and Price K. (1997). Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 11(4): 341–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zirilli, F.: The use of ordinary differential equations in the solution of nonlinear systems of equations. In: Nonlinear Optimization, 1981 (Cambridge, 1981), NATO Conf. Ser. II: Systems Sci., pp. 39–46. Academic Press, London (1982)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CCFEA, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK

    Dietmar Maringer

  2. Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Panos Parpas

Authors
  1. Dietmar Maringer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Panos Parpas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panos Parpas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maringer, D., Parpas, P. Global optimization of higher order moments in portfolio selection. J Glob Optim 43, 219–230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9224-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9224-3

Keywords

Jel Classification

Search

Navigation