Skip to main content
Log in

Obtaining an outer approximation of the efficient set of nonlinear biobjective problems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method for obtaining an outer approximation of the efficient set of nonlinear biobjective optimization problems is presented. It is based on the well known ‘constraint method’, and obtains a superset of the efficient set by computing the regions of δ-optimality of a finite number of single objective constraint problems. An actual implementation, which makes use of interval tools, shows the applicability of the method and the computational studies on a set of competitive location problems demonstrate its efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carrizosa, E., Conde, E., Romero-Morales, D.: Location of a semiobnoxious facility. A biobjective approach, In: Advances in Multiple Objective and Goal Programming 1996.Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 455, pp. 338–346, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Newyork (1997)

  2. Ehrgott M. and Wiecek M.M.  (2005). Multiobjective programming. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S. and Ehrgott, M. (eds) Multiple criteria Decision Analysis: State of the art surveys., pp 667–722. Kluwer, Dordrecht, MA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández J., Pelegrín B., Plastria F. and Tóth B. (2007). Solving a Huff-like competitive location and design model for profit maximization in the plane. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179: 1274–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernández, J., Pelegrín, B., Plastria, F., Tóth, B.: Planar location and design of a new facility with inner and outer competition: an interval lexicographical-like solution procedure, Netw. Spat. Econ, to appear (DOI: 10.1007/s11067-006-9005-4) (2007)

  5. Fernández, J., Tóth, B.: Obtaining an outer approximation of the efficient set of nonlinear biobjective problems (extended version of this paper), Available at http://www.um.es/geloca/ gio/CLMextended.pdf (2005)

  6. Fernández, J., Tóth, B., Plastria, F., Pelegrín, B.: Reconciling franchisor and franchisee: a planar biobjective competitive location and design model. In: Recent Advances in Optimization. Lectures Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 563, pp. 375-398. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Newyork (2006)

  7. (2004). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Kluwer, Dordrecht, MA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hammer R., Hocks M., Kulisch U. and Ratz D. (1995). C++ Toolbox for Verified Computing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen E. and Walster G.W. (2004). Global Optimization Using Interval Analysis, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, P., Jaumard, B.: Lipschitz optimization. In: Handbook of Global Optimization. pp. 407–494. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995)

  11. Huff D.L. (1964). Defining and estimating a trading area. J. Mark. 28: 34–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Knüppel O. (1994). PROFIL/BIAS—a fast interval library. Computing 53: 277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kearfott R.B. (1996). Rigorous Global Search: Continuous Problems. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martínez, J.A., Casado, L.G., García, I., Tóth, B.: AMIGO: advanced multidimensional interval analysis global optimization algorithm, In: Frontiers in Global Optimization. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 74, pp. 313–326. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)

  15. Miettinen K.S. (1998). Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nickel S. and Puerto J. (2005). Location Theory - a Unified Approach. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Plastria F. (1992). GBSSS: the generalized big square small square method for planar single-facility location. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62: 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ratschek H. and Rokne J. (1988). New Computer Methods for Global Optimization. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruzika S. and Wiecek M.M. (2005). Approximation methods in multiobjective programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 126: 473–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayin S. (2000). Measuring the quality of discrete representations of efficient sets in multiple objective mathematical programming. Math. Program. 87: 543–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tóth B. and Csendes T. (2005). Empirical investigation of the convergence speed of inclusion functions. Reliable Comput. 11: 253–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tóth B., Fernández J. and Csendes T. (2007). Empirical convergence speed of inclusion functions for facility location problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 199: 384–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Fernández.

Additional information

An extended version of this paper, with more comments, details, examples, and references, can be found in Fernández and Tóth [5]. This paper has been supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Spain under the research project SEJ2005-06273/ECON, in part financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Boglárka Tóth—On leave from the Research Group on Artificial Intelligence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Aradi vértanúk tere 1., Hungary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández, J., Tóth, B. Obtaining an outer approximation of the efficient set of nonlinear biobjective problems. J Glob Optim 38, 315–331 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-006-9132-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-006-9132-y

Keywords

Navigation