Abstract
In this paper we show that the convergence behavior of the DIviding RECTangles (DIRECT) algorithm is sensitive to additive scaling of the objective function. We illustrate this problem with a computation and show how the algorithm can be modified to eliminate this sensitivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Audet, C., Dennis, J.E.: Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. Technical Report TR04-02, Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice Univeristy (2004)
Audet C., J. D. Jr. Analysis of generalized pattern searches. SIAM J. Optim. 13, 889–903 (2003)
Bartholomew-Biggs M., Parkhurst S., Wilson S. (2002) Using DIRECT to solve an aircraft routing problem. Comput. Optim. Appl. 21, 311–323
Carter R., Gablonsky J., Patrick A., Kelley C., Eslinger O.J. (2001) Algorithms for nosiy problems in gas transmission pipeline optimization. Optim. Eng. 2(2): 139–157
Cramer, E., Carter, M. Global optimization of a multi-element airfoil. In: Collection of Technical Papers, Pt. 2, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, and AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Forum. pp. 5–39 Kissimmee, FL (1997)
Dixon, L., Szego, G. Towards global optimisation 2, 1 edn. North-Holland, New York, NY, (1978)
Finkel, D., Kelley, C. Nonsmooth convergence analysis of DIRECT. Technical Report CRSC-TR04-28, Center for Research in Scientific Computation, North Carolina State University (2004)
Floudas C., Pardalos P. ed. (2001) Encyclopedia of Optimization, Chapter The DIRECT Global Optimization Algorithm, pp. 431–440. The Encyclopedia of Optimization. Kluwer Academic Dordrecht
Gablonsky, J. Modifications of the direct algorithm. Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University (2001a)
Gablonsky J., Kelley C. (2001) A locally-biased form of the DIRECT algorithm. J. Global Optim. 21, 27–37
Gablonsky, J.M. DIRECT version 2.0 user guide. Technical Report CRSC-TR01-08, Center for Research in Scientific Computation, North Carolina State University (2001b)
Gilmore P., Kelley C.T. (1995) An implicit filtering algorithm for optimization of functions with many local minima. SIAM J. Optim. 5, 269–285
He J., Watson L., Ramakrishnan N., Shaffer C., Verstak A., Jian J., Bae K., Bae K., Tranter W. (2002) Dynamic data structures for a direct search algorithm. Comput. Optim. Appl. 23(1): 5–25
Hooke R., Jeeves T. (1961) Direct search solution of numerical and statistical problems. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 8, 212–229
Hough P.D., Kolda T.G., Torczon V.J. (2001) Asynchronous parallel pattern search for nonlinear optimization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 134–156
Jones D., Perttunen C., Stuckman B. (1993) Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant. J. Optim. Theor. Appl. 79(1): 157–181
Kolda T., Lewis R., Torczon V. (2003) Optimization by direct search: new perspective on some classical and modern methods. SIAM Rev. 45(3): 385–482
Ljunberg K., Holmgren S. (2004) Simultaneous search for multiple QTL using the global optimization algorithm DIRECT. Bioinformatics 20(12): 1887–1895
Nelder J., Mead R. (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 308–313
Sasena, M., Papalambros, P., Goovaerts, P. Global optimization of problems with disconnected feasible Regions via Surrogate Modeling. In: 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Atlanta, GA (2002)
Yao Y. (1989) Dynamic Tunneling algorithm for global optimization. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 19, 1222–1230
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finkel, D.E., Kelley, C.T. Additive Scaling and the DIRECT Algorithm. J Glob Optim 36, 597–608 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-006-9029-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-006-9029-9