Abstract
The introduction of cell-free DNA prenatal genetic screening has rekindled discussion of ethical and social questions surrounding prenatal testing, perceptions of disability, and abortion. The growing use of prenatal genetic screening presents a unique opportunity to assess decision-making around new methods of prenatal testing; especially as there is little available research comparing individual and cultural differences that affect a pregnant woman’s decision-making on prenatal testing. We performed a content analysis of online pregnancy forums in the United States and Mainland China. Content from January 2012 to December 2013 was identified through search methodologies and refined to remove duplication. China-based content was translated by a native Mandarin speaker. We used qualitative analysis methods to identify common themes in the dataset. There were 333 English responses and 519 Mandarin responses. Three main themese were identified in the data: decision making factors, attitude towards the pregnancy, and attitudes towards abortion. Women’s narratives reflected how broader social forces can have an impact on intimate personal decision-making. Women in the Mandarin dataset evoked stronger narratives of community and/or family decision-making in pregnancy and were more accepting of the possibility of abortion in the event of a finding of fetal abnormality. Narrative in the English dataset more frequently evoked ideas of unconditional love, regardless of fetal diagnosis, but also acknowledged much stronger support services for individuals with disability and less awareness of stigma. These results highlight the necessity of awareness around how broader cultural and social factors can consciously or unconsciously impact women’s decisions and highlight potential focus areas for future counseling efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allyse, M., Sayres, L. C., Goodspeed, T. A., & Cho, M. K. (2014). Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age. Journal of Perinatology, 34, 429–434.
Asch, A. (1999). Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1649–1657.
Bell, M., & Stoneman, Z. (2000). Reactions to prenatal testing: reflection of religiosity and attitudes toward abortion and people with disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105(1), 1–13.
Benn, P. A., & Chapman, A. R. (2009). Practical and ethical considerations of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(20), 2154–2156.
Chan, Y. M., Leung, T. N., Leung, T. Y., Fung, T. Y., Chan, L. W., & Lau, T. K. (2006). The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage. Prenatal Diagnosis, 26(9), 819–824.
Chandler, M., & Smith, A. (1998). Prenatal screening and women’s perception of infant disability: a Sophie’s choice for every mother. Nursing Inquiry, 5(2), 71–76.
Chandrasekharan, S., Minear, M. A., Hung, A., & Allyse, M. (2014). Noninvasive prenatal testing goes global. Science Translational Medicine, 6(231), 231fs15.
Chen, X., & Fan, R. (2010). The family and harmonious medical decision making: cherishing an appropriate Confucian moral balance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35, 573–586.
Chen, T. Y., & Tang, C. S. (1997). Stress appraisal and social support of Chinese mothers of adult children with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101(5), 473–482.
Chiu, R. W. K., Allen Chan, K. C., Gao, Y., Lau, V. Y. M., Zheng, W., Leung, T. Y., et al. (2008). Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma. PNAS, 105(51), 20458–20463.
de Jong, A., & de Wert, G. M. (2015). Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future. Bioethics, 29(1), 46–55.
Farrell, R. M., Agatisa, P. K., & Nutter, B. (2014). What women want: lead considerations for current and future applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal care. Birth, 41(3), 276–282.
Fearn, J., Hibbard, B. M., Lauren, K. M., Roberts, A., & Robinson, J. O. (1982). Screening for neural-tube defects and maternal anxiety. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 89(3), 218–221.
Heger. (2015). Clinical NGS Market in China Poised to Take Off as China FDA Looks to Establish Guidelines, GenomeWeb.
Holroyd, E. E. (2003). Chinese cultural influences on parental caregiving obligations towards children with disabilities. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 4–19.
Kohrman, M. (1999). Grooming “que zi”: marriage exclusion and identity formation among disabled men in contemporary China. American Ethnologist, 26(4), 890–909.
Kou, K. O., Poon, C. F., Wai, C. T., Mak, S. L., & Leung, K. Y. (2015). Knowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15(1), 199.
Leung, T. N., Chau, M. M. C., Chang, J. J., Leung, T. Y., Fung, T. Y., & Lau, T. K. (2004). Attitudes towards termination of pregnancy among Hong Kong Chinese women attending prenatal diagnosis counselling clinic. Prenatal Diagnosis, 24(7), 546–551.
Lo, Y. M. D., Tein, M. S. C., Lau, T. K., Haines, C. J., Leung, T. N., Poon, P. M. K., et al. (1998). Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62(4), 768–775.
Markens, S., Browner, C., & Press, N. (1999). ‘Because of the risks’: how US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 359–369.
Mei, L., Tang, Q., Sun, B., & Xu, L. (2014). Noninvasive prenatal testing in China: Future detection of rare genetic diseases? Noninvasive prenatal testing in China: future detection of rare genetic diseases? Intractable & Rare Diseases Research, 3(3), 87–90.
Michie, M., & Allyse, M. (2015). Old questions, new paradigms: ethical, legal, and social complications of noninvasive prenatal testing. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 6(1), 1–4.
Ohman, S. G., Grunewald, C., & Waldenstrom, U. (2003). Women’s worries during pregnancy: testing the Cambridge worry scale on 200 Swedish women. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17(2), 148–152.
Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 40–47.
Pew Research Center. (2006). A barometer of modern morals: sex, drugs, and the 1040.
Pew Research Center. (2012). Table: Religious Composition by Country, in Percentages.
Porter, E. (1994). Abortion ethics: rights and responsibilities. Hypatia, 9(3), 66–87.
Rigdon, S. M. (1996). Abortion law and practice in China: an overview with comparisons to the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 42(4), 543–560.
Sayres, L. C., Allyse, M., Goodspeed, T. A., & Cho, M. K. (2014). Demographic and experiential correlates of public attitudes towards cell-free fetal DNA screening. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(6), 957–967.
Shaffer, B. L., Caughey, A. B., & Norton, M. E. (2006). Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy. Prenatal Diagnosis, 26(8), 667–671.
Skotko, B. G. (2005). Prenatally diagnosed down syndrome: mothers who continued their pregnancies evaluate their health care providers. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192(3), 670–677.
Skotko, B. G., Levine, S. P., & Goldstein, R. (2011). Having a son or daughter with down syndrome: perspectives from mothers and fathers. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 9999, 1–13.
Sonnander, K., & Claesson, M. (1997). Classification, prevalence, prevention and rehabilitation of intellectual disability: an overview of research in the People’s republic of China. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41(2), 180–192.
Sparks, A. B., Struble, C. A., Wang, E. T., Song, K., & Oliphant, A. (2012). Noninvasive prenatal detection and selective analysis of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal blood: evaluation for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. American Jounral of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206(4), 319.e1–3319e9.
Stratford, B., & Ng, H. (2000). People with disabilities in China: changing outlook—new solutions—growing problems. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(1), 7–14.
Wang, P., Michaels, C. A., & Day, M. S. (2011). Stresses and coping strategies of Chinese families with children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 783–795.
Yi, H., Yung Ngan, O. M., Griffiths, S., & Sahota, D. (2015). Ethical concerns in the implementation of DNA sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy among obstetric professionals in Hong Kong. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 6(1), 81–93.
Zhu, W. X., Lu, L., & Hesketh, T. (2009). China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: Analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. BMJ [British Medical Journal], 338(apr09 2), b1211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Grace Li, Subhashini Chandrasekharan and Megan Allyse declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Animal Studies
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, G., Chandrasekharan, S. & Allyse, M. “The Top Priority Is a Healthy Baby”: Narratives of Health, Disability, and Abortion in Online Pregnancy Forum Discussions in the US and China. J Genet Counsel 26, 32–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9976-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9976-3