Abstract
Personal genome sequencing is increasingly utilized by healthy individuals for predispositional screening and other applications. However, little is known about the impact of ‘genomic counseling’ on informed decision-making in this context. Our primary aim was to compare measures of participants’ informed decision-making before and after genomic counseling in the HealthSeq project, a longitudinal cohort study of individuals receiving personal results from whole genome sequencing (WGS). Our secondary aims were to assess the impact of the counseling on WGS knowledge and concerns, and to explore participants’ satisfaction with the counseling. Questionnaires were administered to participants (n = 35) before and after their pre-test genomic counseling appointment. Informed decision-making was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS). DCS scores decreased after genomic counseling (mean: 11.34 before vs. 5.94 after; z = −4.34, p < 0.001, r = 0.52), and SDS scores increased (mean: 27.91 vs. 29.06 respectively; z = 2.91, p = 0.004, r = 0.35). Satisfaction with counseling was high (mean (SD) = 26.91 (2.68), on a scale where 6 = low and 30 = high satisfaction). HealthSeq participants felt that their decision regarding receiving personal results from WGS was more informed after genomic counseling. Further research comparing the impact of different genomic counseling models is needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahman, A., Runestam, K., & Sarkadi, A. (2010). Did I really want to know this? pregnant women’s reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening. Patient Education and Counseling, 81(1), 87–93.
Andermann, A. J., Austoker, J., Watson, E. K., Lucassen, A. M., & Mackay, J. (2002). Development and evaluation of a general information leaflet for women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of Cancer Education: The Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 17(3), 155–160.
Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratory. (2015) Retrieved June 17, 2015 from https://www.bcm.edu/research/medical-genetics-labs/test_detail.cfm?testcode=1605
Bernhardt, B. A., Soucier, D., Hanson, K., Savage, M. S., Jackson, L., & Wapner, R. J. (2013). Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 15(2), 139–145.
Biesecker, L. G., Mullikin, J. C., Facio, F. M., Turner, C., Cherukuri, P. F., Blakesley, R. W., et al. (2009). The clinseq project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Research, 19(9), 1665–1674.
Bloss, C. S., Ornowski, L., Silver, E., Cargill, M., Vanier, V., Schork, N. J., et al. (2010). Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 12(9), 556–566.
Church, G. M. (2005). The personal genome project. Molecular Systems Biology, 1–3.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colquhoun, D. (2014). An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. Royal Society Open Science, 1(3), 1–16.
DeMarco, T. A., Peshkin, B. N., Mars, B. D., & Tercyak, K. P. (2004). Patient satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling: a psychometric analysis of the genetic counseling satisfaction scale. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(4), 293–304.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed., ). Los Angeles, Ca: Sage.
Gonzalez-Garay, M. L., McGuire, A. L., Pereira, S., & Caskey, C. T. (2013). Personalized genomic disease risk of volunteers. Proceedings of the National Academy Of Sciences of the United States Of America, 110(42), 16957–16962.
Holmes-Rovner, M., Kroll, J., Schmitt, N., Rovner, D. R., Breer, M. L., Rothert, M. L., et al. (1996). Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Medical Decision Making, 16(1), 58–64.
Hooker, G. W., Ormond, K. E., Sweet, K., & Biesecker, B. B. (2014). Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 445–451.
Ishiyama, I., Nagai, A., Muto, K., Tamakoshi, A., Kokado, M., Mimura, K., et al. (2008). Relationship between public attitudes toward genomic studies related to medicine and their level of genomic literacy in Japan. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 146A(13), 1696–1706.
Kaphingst, K. A., Facio, F. M., Cheng, M. R., Brooks, S., Eidem, H., Linn, A., et al. (2012). Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge. Clinical Genetics, 82(5), 408–415.
Kleinveld, J. H., Ten Kate, L. P., van den Berg, M., van Vugt, J. M. G., & Timmermans, D. R. M. (2009). Does informed decision making influence psychological outcomes after receiving a positive screening outcome? Prenatal Diagnosis, 29(3), 271–273.
Marteau, T. M., Dormandy, E., & Michie, S. (2001). A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 4(2), 99–108.
Mills, R., & Haga, S. B. (2014). Genomic counseling: next generation counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 689–692.
National Society of Genetic Counselors. Retrieved November 10, 2015 from http://nsgc.org/p/cm/ld/fid=175
O’Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25–30.
O'Connor A.M. User Manual - Decisional Conflict Scale (16 item statement format) [document on the Internet]. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; © 1993 [updated 2010; cited 2015 06 17]. 16 p. Available from http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflict.pdf
O'Connor A.M. & Cranney A. User Manual – Acceptability [document on the Internet]. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; © 1996 [modified 2002; cited 2015 06 17]. 5 p. Available from http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Acceptability.pdf
Ormond, K. E. (2013). From genetic counseling to “genomic counseling”. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 1(4), 189–193.
Rimer, B. K., Briss, P. A., Zeller, P. K., Chan, E. C. Y., & Woolf, S. H. (2004). Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer, 101(5 Suppl), 1214–1228.
Sanderson, S. C., Diefenbach, M. A., Zinberg, R., Horowitz, C. R., Smirnoff, M., Zweig, M., et al. (2013). Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study. Journal of Community Genetics, 4(4), 469–482.
Sanderson, S. C., Linderman, M. D., Suckiel, S. A., Diaz, G. A., Zinberg, R. E., Ferryman, K., et al. (2015a). Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: baseline findings from the healthseq project. European Journal of Human Genetics.
Sanderson, S. C., Suckiel, S. A., Zweig, M., Bottinger, E. P., Jabs, E. W., & Richardson, L. D. (2015b). Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public. Genetics in Medicine.
Tercyak, K. P., Johnson, S. B., Roberts, S. F., & Cruz, A. C. (2001). psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(1), 73–84.
Understand Your Genome (UYG) Sequencing Conference | Illumina. Retrieved August 5, 2014 from http://www.illumina.com/company/events/understand-your-genome.ilmn
Vassy, J. L., Lautenbach, D. M., McLaughlin, H. M., Kong, S. W., Christensen, K. D., Krier, J., et al. (2014). The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials, 15(85), 1–12.
Wicklund, C., & Trepanier, A. (2014). Adapting genetic counseling training to the genomic era: more an evolution than a revolution. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 452–454.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Animal Studies
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Online Resource 1
(PPT 125 kb)
Online Resource 2
(DOCX 23 kb)
Online Resource 3
(DOCX 23 kb)
Online Resource 4
(DOCX 21 kb)
Online Resource 5
(DOCX 22 kb)
Online Resource 6
(DOCX 17 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suckiel, S.A., Linderman, M.D., Sanderson, S.C. et al. Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project. J Genet Counsel 25, 1044–1053 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9935-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9935-z