Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Patient letters are a powerful tool that genetic counselors use to communicate with their patients. Patient letters are often sent to provide information on a new diagnosis, reiterate test results, and to serve as a permanent record of the visit. Patient letters, however, are only helpful if the patients can understand them. More than 50 % of the US population reads below a 9th grade reading level and over one-third of the population has low health literacy skills. In this study we evaluate the readability of genetic counseling patient letters by assessing reading level, image use, and terminology use. One hundred forty-nine genetic counselors participated in the survey and of these, 79 submitted a sample patient letter. Analyses of the letters revealed a mean reading level of 10.93. On average, 6 genetic terms were included in each letter, and only 25 % of these terms were defined. Analyses of survey responses revealed over 75 % of the genetic counselors did not include images in their patient letters. These results indicate there is room for improvement in order to make genetic counseling patient letters more accessible to the general population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(5), 399–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers For Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). [PDF]. Simply put: A guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/pdf/simply-put.pdf

  • Debanco, T., Walker, J., Bell, S. K., Darer, J. D., Elmore, J. G., Farag, N., et al. (2012). Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and look ahead. Annuals of Internal Medicine, 157(7), 461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delp, C., & Jones, J. (1996). Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Academy of Emergency Medicine, 3(3), 264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erby, L. H., Roter, D., Larson, S., & Cho, J. (2008). The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL‐G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146(2), 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Richards, M., Murton, F., Statham, H., & Hallowell, N. (1997). Family communication and genetic counseling: the case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(1), 45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35(1), 27–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurle, B., Citrin, T., Jenkins, J. F., Kaphingst, K. A., Lamb, N., Roseman, J. E., & Bonham, V. L. (2013). What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute meeting report. Genetics in Medicine, 15(8), 658–663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. W., & Davis, C. A. (1980). Assessing readability: the checklist approach. Journal of Reading, 24, 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karan, A., Campbell, D., & Mayer, H. (2011). The effect of a visual aid on the comprehension of cataract surgery in a rural, indigent south Indian population. Digital Journal of Ophthalmology, 17(3), 16–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemek, F. E. (1984). A brief discussion of readability formulas. The High School Journal, 248–251.

  • Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of america’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. United States: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, P. (2011). Satisfaction, compliance and communication. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(4), 241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, G. M. (1987). Readability formulas: useful or useless. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 30, 12–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, C. D., & Smith, C. F. (1991). Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Patient Education and Counseling, 17(2), 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesters, I., Ausems, A., & De Vries, H. (2005). General public’s knowledge, interest and information needs related to genetic cancer: An exploratory study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(1), 69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molster, C., Charles, T., Samanek, A., & O’Leary, P. (2009). Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health. Public Health Genomics, 12, 84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen-Bohlman, L., Panzer, A., Kindig, D. A., & Hamlin, B. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. United States: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ownby, R. L. (2005). Influence of vocabulary and sentence complexity and passive voice on the readability of consumer-oriented mental health information on the internet. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (Vol. 2005, p. 585). American Medical Informatics Association.

  • Roggenbuck, J., Temme, R., Pond, D., Baker, J., Jarvis, K., Liu, M., Dugan, S., & Mendelsohn, N. J. (2014). The long and short of genetic counseling summary letters: a case–control study. Journal of genetic counseling, 1–9.

  • Sandberg, E. H., Sharma, R., & Sandberg, W. S. (2012). Deficits in retention for verbally presented medical information. Anesthesiology, 117(4), 772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Pollin, T. (2007). Patient education. In W. Uhlmann, J. Schuette, & B. Yashar (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (2nd ed., p. 177). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, K., Elborn, J. S., Rendall, J., & Bradley, J. M. (2008). Copying letters to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF): letter content and patient perceptions of benefit. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 7(6), 511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, P., Singleton, A., & Jones, R. (2004). Copying referral letters to patients: the views of patients, patient representatives and doctors. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(1), 94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the genetic counselors that participated in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Emily Brown, Megan Skinner, Stephanie Ashley, Kate Reed, and Shannan DeLany Dixon declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study.

Animal Studies

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, E., Skinner, M., Ashley, S. et al. Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters. J Genet Counsel 25, 454–460 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9890-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9890-0

Keywords

Navigation