Abstract
Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) can provide parents with a wide range of genetic information about their children, and adoptive parents may have unique issues to consider regarding possible access to this information. The few papers published on adoption and genetics have focused on targeted genetic testing of children in the pre-adoption context. There are no data on adoptive parents’ perspectives about pediatric ES/WGS, including their preferences about different kinds of results, and the potential benefits and risks of receiving results. To explore these issues, we conducted four exploratory focus groups with adoptive parents (N = 26). The majority lacked information about their children’s biological family health history and ancestry, and many viewed WGS results as a way to fill in these gaps in knowledge. Some expressed concerns about protecting their children’s future privacy and autonomy, but at the same time stated that WGS results could possibly help them be proactive about their children’s health. A few parents expressed concerns about the risks of WGS in a pre-adoption context, specifically about decreasing a child’s chance of adoption. These results suggest that issues surrounding genetic information in the post-adoption and ES/WGS contexts need to be considered, as well as concerns about risks in the pre-adoption context. A critical challenge for ES/WGS in the context of adoption will be balancing the right to know different kinds of genetic information with the right not to know. Specific guidance for geneticists and genetic counselors may be needed to maximize benefits of WGS while minimizing harms and prohibiting misuse of the information in the adoption process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
23andMe Helps Man Find Family. November 5, 2013. Retrieved from https://doi.org/blog.23andme.com/23andme-customer-stories/23andme-helps-man-find-family/.
23andMe’s Tools Help Solve Ancestry Mystery. February 11, 2013. Retrieved from https://doi.org/blog.23andme.com/ancestry/23andmes-tools-help-solve-ancestry-mystery/.
Amy’s Story. November 20, 2013. Retrieved from https://doi.org/blog.23andme.com/23andme-customer-stories/amys-story.
An Unexpected Discovery. October 30, 2013. Retrieved from https://doi.org/blog.23andme.com/23andme-customer-stories/an-unexpected-discovery/.
ASHG/ACMG. (1995). Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American society of human genetics board of directors, american college of medical genetics board of directors. American Journal of Human Genetics, 57(5), 1233–1241.
ASHG/ACMG. (2000). Genetic testing in adoption. The american society of human genetics social issues committee and the american college of medical genetics social, ethical, and legal issues committee. American Journal of Human Genetics, 66, 761–7.
Blackstone J. 2012. Online DNA mapping helps siblings find each other. CBSNews.com. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.cbsnews.com/news/online-dna-mapping-helps-siblings-find-each-other/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/online-dna-mapping-helps-siblings-find-each-other/.
Bramlett, M. D. (2008). Adopted children with special health care needs: characteristics, health, and health care by adoption type. Office of the assistant secretary for planning and evaluation. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services.
Bramlett, M. D., Radel, L. F., & Blumberg, S. J. (2007). The health and well-being of adopted children. Pediatrics, 119(Suppl 1), S54–60.
Connecting With The Past. August 27, 2013. Retrieved from https://doi.org/blog.23andme.com/ancestry/connecting-with-the-past/
Genetic Testing and Adoption. 2014. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/nsgc.org/p/bl/et/blogid=47&blogaid=152.
Global Adoptee Genealogy Project. 2013. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.mixedrootsfoundation.org/category-s/1858.htm.
Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Martin, C. L., McGuire, A. L., Nussbaum, R. L., O’Daniel, J. M., Ormond, K. E., Rehm, H. L., Watson, M. S., & Biesecker, L. G. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7), 565–74.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Jones, V. F., High, P. C., Donoghue, E., Fussell, J. J., Gleason, M. M., Jaudes, P. K., et al. (2012). Comprehensive health evaluation of the newly adopted child. Pediatrics, 129(1), e214–23.
Knoppers BM, Avard D, Sénécal K, Zawati MH along with the P3G International Paediatrics Platform members. 2014. Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform. Eur J Hum Genet 22: 3–5.
McCullough M. 1996. “Genetics’ impact on adoption records: Advances in gene research strengthen the case for adoptees who want to know their birth parents’ medical history.” Baltimore Sun 7/23/1996. https://doi.org/articles.baltimoresun.com/1996-07-23/features/1996205094_1_adoptees-birth-parents-adoption-records.
Ross, L. F., Saal, H. M., David, K. L., & Anderson, R. R. (2013). Technical report: ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genetics in Medicine, 15(3), 234–45.
Siegel DH, Smith SL. 2012. Openness in Adoption: From Secrecy and Stigma to Knowledge and Connections. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute.
Sisters Connect with 23andMe. July 2, 2013. Retrieved from https://doi.org/blog.23andme.com/23andme-customer-stories/sister-connect-with-23andme/.
Stories From 23andMe: “Hey, Bro”. August 18, 2011. Retrieved from https://doi.org/blog.23andme.com/23andme-customer-stories/stories-from-23andme-neil-schwartzman/.
Swarns R. 2012. With DNA testing, suddenly they are family. The New York Times. New York, NY.
UN Department of economic and social affairs. 2009. Child Adoption: Trends and Policies. New York.
Yu, J. H., Crouch, J., Jamal, S. M., Tabor, H. K., & Bamshad, M. J. (2013). Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 161A(5), 1064–72.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the adoptive parents who participated in this study; World Association for Children and Parents (WACAP) and Adoptive Friends and Families of Greater Seattle (AFFGS) for supporting recruitment efforts; Odessa Brown Children’s Clinic for hosting focus groups; Sue Trinidad, Jacqueline Stock, Amy Lemke, and Jennifer Merritt for contributing to the study’s early development; and Amy Lemke, Seema Jamal, Jennifer Merritt and Anna Tabor for providing feedback on the analysis and/or manuscript. Our work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health/National Human Genome Research Institute (5ROOHG004316).
Conflict of Interest
Julia Crouch, Joon-Ho Yu, Aditi G. Shankar, and Holly K. Tabor declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Washington Institutional Review Board and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crouch, J., Yu, JH., Shankar, A.G. et al. “We Don’t Know Her History, Her Background”: Adoptive Parents’ Perspectives on Whole Genome Sequencing Results. J Genet Counsel 24, 67–77 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9738-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9738-z