Skip to main content
Log in

The Current State of Genetic Counseling Before and After Amniocentesis for Fetal Karyotyping in Japan: A Survey of Obstetric Hospital Clients of a Prenatal Testing Laboratory

  • Genetic Counseling: A Global Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Pregnant women undergoing prenatal genetic testing should receive genetic counseling so they can make informed decisions. We examined the current state of providing genetic counseling in Japan to pregnant women before they elected amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities and after test results were completed, and explored the opportunity for expanding access to certified genetic counselors (CGC) at clinical practices offering amniocentesis. An anonymous survey was mailed to the 298 hospitals that referred amniotic fluid specimens to LabCorp Japan in 2009. Most genetic counseling was provided by the obstetrician alone; 73.8 % (76/103) of pre-amniocentesis, 82.5 % (85/103) if normal results, and 49.4 % (44/89) if abnormal results. Respondents spent limited time in genetic counseling; 57.3 % spent <10 min for pre-amniocentesis, 88.3 % spent <10 min for normal results, and 54.0 % spent <20 min for abnormal results. While 45.8 % indicated that CGC do not have an essential role in clinical practice, responses that supported employment of CGC were more likely to come from hospitals that submitted more than ten specimens annually (p < 0.0001), university hospitals (p < 0.0001), and MD geneticists (p = 0.020). Currently, there is limited genetic counseling available in Japan. This indicates there are opportunities for the employment of CGC to improve the quality of genetic counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhogal, A. K., & Brunger, F. (2010). Prenatal genetic counseling in cross-cultural medicine: a framework for family physicians. Canadian Family Physician, 56, 993–999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutillo, D., Ramsey, D., Cohen, A., Bombard, A., Bhatt, S., Donnenfeld, A., et al. (2002). Risk factors identified through genetic counseling; The value of a comprehensive risk assessment. American College of Medical Genetics Annual Meeting, page 50, Abstract 25.

  • Expert Committee on Prenatal Diagnosis of the Sciences Council for Evaluating Advanced Medical Techniques of Japan. (1999). View on prenatal serum marker screening. Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http://www1.mhlw.go.jp/houhou/1107/h0721-1_18.html (in Japanese).

  • Farrelly, E., Cho, M.K., Erby, L., Roter, D., Stenzel, A., & Ormond, K. (2012). Genetic counseling for prenatal testing: where is the discussion about disability? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 814–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genetic-Medicine-Related Societies. (2003). Guidelines for genetic testing. Retrieved November 2, 2012, form http://jshg.jp/pdf/10academies_e.pdf (in Japanese).

  • Japanese Board of Certified Genetic Counselors. (2012). Retrieved February 11, 2013, from http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~GC/index.html (in Japanese).

  • Japanese Board of Medical Genetics. (2012). About certification of clinical geneticist. Retrieved February 11, 2013, from http://www.jbmg.jp/about/index.html (in Japanese).

  • Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. (2007). Guidelines for prenatal diagnosis for congenital fetal abnormalities. Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http://www.jsog.jp/jsog_web/html/html/announce_26FEB2007.html (in Japanese).

  • Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. (2011). Guidelines for prenatal diagnosis for congenital fetal abnormalities. Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http://www.jsog.or.jp/news/pdf/shussyouzenkenkaikaitei_20110206.pdf (in Japanese).

  • Kajii, T. (2008). Predicted prevalence of down syndrome live births in Japan, 1970–2006. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 146A, 1387–1388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koscica, K. L., Canterino, J. C., Harrigan, J. T., Dalaya, T., Ananth, C. V., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2001). Assessing genetic risk: comparison between the referring obstetrician and genetic counselor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 185, 1032–1034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maternal Health Protection Law. (2011). Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/S23/S23HO156.html (in Japanese).

  • National Society of Genetic Counselors Task Force. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ Task Force Report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, A., Sawai, H., Masuzaki, H., Hirahara, F., & Sago, H. (2011). Low prevalence of genetic prenatal diagnosis in Japan. Prenatal Diagnosis, 31, 1007–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Japanese Association of Medical Sciences. (2011). Guidelines for genetic tests and diagnoses in medical practice. Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http://jams.med.or.jp/guideline/genetics-diagnosis_e.pdf

  • Yamanouchi, Y., Ono, A., Sato, Y., Nishida, C., Masuno, M., & Kuroki, Y. (2010). Current Situation of the Certified Genetic Counselors in Japan, 2010. Japanese Journal of Genetic Counseling, 31, 48 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miyuki Nishiyama.

Additional information

Miyuki Nishiyama is an employee of LabCorp Japan. Other authors do not have conflicts to report. This manuscript is submitted solely to this journal and was not published elsewhere.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishiyama, M., Sawai, H. & Kosugi, S. The Current State of Genetic Counseling Before and After Amniocentesis for Fetal Karyotyping in Japan: A Survey of Obstetric Hospital Clients of a Prenatal Testing Laboratory. J Genet Counsel 22, 795–804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9632-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9632-0

Keyword

Navigation