Abstract
The Service Delivery Model Task Force (SDMTF) was appointed in 2009 by the leadership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) with a charge to research and assess the capacity of all existing service delivery models to improve access to genetic counseling services in the context of increasing demand for genetic testing and counseling. In approaching this charge, the SDMTF found that there were varying interpretations of what was meant by “service delivery models” and the group held extensive discussions about current practices to arrive at consensus of proposed definitions for current genetic service delivery models, modes of referral and components of service delivery. The major goal of these proposed definitions is to allow for conversations to begin to address the charge to the committee. We propose that current models of service delivery can be defined by: 1) the methods in which genetic counseling services are delivered (In-person, Telephone, Group and Telegenetics), 2) the way they are accessed by patients (Traditional referral, Tandem, Triage, Rescue and Self-referral) and 3) the variable components that depend upon multiple factors unique to each service setting. This report by the SDMTF provides a starting point whereby standardized terminology can be used in future studies that assess the effectiveness of these described models to overcome barriers to access to genetic counseling services.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battista, R. N., Blancquaert, I., Laberge, A. M., van Schendel, N., & Leduc, N. (2012). Genetics in health care: an overview of current and emerging models. Public Health Genomics, 15(1), 34–45.
Bradbury, A. R., Patrick-Miller, L., Fetzer, D., Egleston, B., Cummings, S. A., Forman, A., et al. (2011). Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results. Clin Genet, 79(2), 125–131. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01540.x.
Calzone, K. A., Prindiville, S. A., Jourkiv, O., Jenkins, J., DeCarvalho, M., Wallerstedt, D. B., et al. (2005). Randomized comparison of group versus individual genetic education and counseling for familial breast and/or ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol, 23(15), 3455–3464. doi:23/15/3455[pii]10.1200/JCO.2005.04.050.
Coelho, J. J., Arnold, A., Nayler, J., Tischkowitz, M., & MacKay, J. (2005). An assessment of the efficacy of cancer genetic counselling using real-time videoconferencing technology (telemedicine) compared to face-to-face consultations. Eur J Cancer, 41(15), 2257–2261. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.020.
Cohen, S. A., McIlvried, D., & Schnieders, J. (2009). A collaborative approach to genetic testing: a community hospital's experience. J Genet Couns, 18(6), 530–533. doi:10.1007/s10897-009-9243-y.
Dabney, M. K., & Huelsman, K. (2000). Counseling by computer: breast cancer risk and genetic testing. Developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Medicine and the Program in Medical Ethics. Genet Test, 4(1), 43–44. doi:10.1089/109065700316453.
Doughty Rice, C., Ruschman, J. G., Martin, L. J., Manders, J. B., & Miller, E. (2010). Retrospective comparison of patient outcomes after in-person and telephone results disclosure counseling for BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Fam Cancer, 9(2), 203–212. doi:10.1007/s10689-009-9303-3.
Gattas, M. R., MacMillan, J. C., Meinecke, I., Loane, M., & Wootton, R. (2001). Telemedicine and clinical genetics: establishing a successful service. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 7(suppl 2), 68–70. doi:10.1258/1357633011937191.
Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Baker, M. W., Friedman, L. C., Harper, G. R., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2005). Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions. Genet Med, 7(4), 221–229.
Guttmacher, A. E., Jenkins, J., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2001). Genomic medicine: who will practice it? A call to open arms. Am J Med Genet, 106(3), 216–222. doi:10.1002/ajmg.10008.
Hall, A. G., Lemak, C. H., Steingraber, H., & Schaffer, S. (2008). Expanding the definition of access: it isn't just about health insurance. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 19(2), 625–638. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0011.
Hawkins, A. K., & Hayden, M. R. (2011). A grand challenge: providing benefits of clinical genetics to those in need. Genet Med, 13(3), 197–200. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820c056e.
Heimler, A. (1990). Group counseling for couples who have terminated a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis. Birth Defects Original Article Series, 26(3), 161–167.
Hooper, B., Buckman, M., & Edwards, M. (2011). Evaluation of satisfaction of parents with the use of videoconferencing for a pediatric genetic consultation. Twin Res Hum Genet, 14(4), 343–346.
IOM (Institute of Medicine) (2009). Innovations in service delivery in the age of genomics: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12601.html.
Jenkins, J., Calzone, K. A., Dimond, E., Liewehr, D. J., Steinberg, S. M., Jourkiv, O., et al. (2007). Randomized comparison of phone versus in-person BRCA1/2 predisposition genetic test result disclosure counseling. Genet Med, 9(8), 487–495. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31812e6220.
Kaiser, A. S., Ferris, L. E., Pastuszak, A. L., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Johnson, J.-A., Conacher, S., et al. (2002). The effects of prenatal group genetic counselling on knowledge, anxiety and decisional conflict: issues for nuchal translucency screening. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 22(3), 246–255. doi:10.1080/01443610220130508.
McAllister, M., Payne, K., Macleod, R., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2008). What process attributes of clinical genetics services could maximise patient benefits? Eur J Hum Genet, 16(12), 1467–1476. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.121.
Meropol, N. J., Daly, M. B., Vig, H. S., Manion, F. J., Manne, S. L., Mazar, C., et al. (2011). Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17(1), 36–40. doi:10.1258/jtt.2010.100116.
Peshkin, B. N., Demarco, T. A., Graves, K. D., Brown, K., Nusbaum, R. H., Moglia, D., et al. (2008). Telephone genetic counseling for high-risk women undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: rationale and development of a randomized controlled trial. Genet Test, 12(1), 37–52. doi:10.1089/gte.2006.0525.
Ridge, Y., Panabaker, K., McCullum, M., Portigal-Todd, C., Scott, J., & McGillivray, B. (2009). Evaluation of group genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Genet Couns, 18(1), 87–100. doi:10.1007/s10897-008-9189-5.
Shengelia, B., Tandon, A., Adams, O. B., & Murray, C. J. L. (2005). Access, utilization, quality, and effective coverage: an integrated conceptual framework and measurement strategy. Social Science & Medicine, 61(1), 97–109. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.055.
Sutphen, R., Davila, B., Shappell, H., Holtje, T., Vadaparampil, S., Friedman, S., et al. (2010). Real world experience with cancer genetic counseling via telephone. Familial Cancer, 9(4), 681–689. doi:10.1007/s10689-010-9369-y.
Tuckson, R. (2006). Coverage and Reimbursement of Genetic Tests and Services: Report of the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society. http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/sacghs/reports/CR_report.pdf.
Wang, C., Gonzalez, R., Milliron, K. J., Strecher, V. J., & Merajver, S. D. (2005). Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process. Am J Med Genet A, 134A(1), 66–73. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30577.
Wham, D., Vu, T., Chan-Smutko, G., Kobelka, C., Urbauer, D., & Heald, B. (2010). Assessment of clinical practices among cancer genetic counselors. Fam Cancer. doi:10.1007/s10689-010-9326-9.
Young, R., Jorgenson, R., & Shapiro, S. (1986). Efficacy of and patient preference for three counseling formats. Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology, 6, 3–14.
Zilliacus, E. M., Meiser, B., Lobb, E. A., Kelly, P. J., Barlow-Stewart, K., Kirk, J. A., et al. (2011). Are videoconferenced consultations as effective as face-to-face consultations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling? Genet Med, 13(11), 933–941. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182217a19.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge all the members of the SDMTF for their contributions to this work. We also would like to acknowledge graphic designer Gregory Nixon for his work to produce the SDM figure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, S.A., Gustafson, S.L., Marvin, M.L. et al. Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors Service Delivery Model Task Force: A Proposal to Define Models, Components, and Modes of Referral. J Genet Counsel 21, 645–651 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-012-9505-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-012-9505-y