Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Living with Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer; Experiences from and Impact of Genetic Testing

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is one of our most common cancer syndromes and an increasing number of individuals live in families with verified hereditary cancer. We conducted an interview study to explore experiences from and perceived impact on life after genetic testing for HNPCC. Three major themes emerged: reactions and emotions, family relations and implications for life. Among the reactions described were suspecting heredity, feelings of guilt, the importance of experiential knowledge, and coping strategies. The impact on family relations was related to perceived responsibility for conveying information, encountering different reactions among family members, and difficulties in communication and relations. The implications described included uncertainty, adaptation, new choices and changes in life, family planning issues, and experiences of surveillance programs. We suggest that the themes and sub-themes identified should be taken into account during genetic counselling in order to facilitate the spread of information and to prepare family members for the impact on life that knowledge about hereditary cancer may have.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarnio, M., Sankila, R., Pukkala, E., Salovaara, R., Aaltonen, L. A., de la Chapelle, A., et al. (1999). Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes. International Journal of Cancer, 81(2), 214–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broadstock, M., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics, 8(10), 731–738.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claes, E., Denayer, L., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., & Legius, E. (2004). Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: Motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(2), 265–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Codori, A. M., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D. L., Larkin, E. K., Bushey, M. T., Young, C., et al. (2004). Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: Factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 8(4 Pt 2), 345–351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • d’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2005). The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(1), 55–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esplen, M. J., Madlensky, L., Butler, K., McKinnon, W., Bapat, B., Wong, J., et al. (2001). Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(1), 9–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esplen, M. J., Urquhart, C., Butler, K., Gallinger, S., Aronson, M., & Wong, J. (2003). The experience of loss and anticipation of distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55(5), 427–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: Barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64(4), 317–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: Probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(2), 133–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, P., Shenton, A., Lalloo, F., Evans, D. G., & Howell, A. (2001). Risk perception and cancer worry: An exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of Medical Genetics, 38(2), 139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 12(4), 304–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J., Macluran, M., Price, M., Bennett, B., & Butow, P. (2004). Short- and long-term impact of receiving genetic mutation results in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(2), 115–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindor, N. M., Petersen, G. M., Hadley, D. W., Kinney, A. Y., Miesfeldt, S., Lu, K. H., et al. (2006). Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: A systematic review. JAMA, 296(12), 1507–1517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, S., Shields, C., Levenkron, J. C., Fishel, R., & Rowley, P. T. (2002). Patient vs. physician as the target of educational outreach about screening for an inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Genetic Testing, 6(4), 281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, M. (2003). Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 64(3), 179–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meiser, B. (2005). Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: An update of the literature. Psychooncology, 14(12), 1060–1074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiser, B., Collins, V., Warren, R., Gaff, C., St John, D. J., Young, M. A., et al. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Clinical Genetics, 66(6), 502–511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meiser, B., & Halliday, J. L. (2002). What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Social Science & Medicine, 54(10), 1463–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesters, I., Ausems, M., Eichhorn, S., & Vasen, H. (2005). Informing one’s family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): A retrospective exploratory study. Familial Cancer, 4(2), 163–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. J., Farrington, S. M., Dunlop, M. G., & Campbell, H. (2002). Mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 and colorectal cancer: A HuGE review. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156(10), 885–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pentz, R. D., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B., Vernon, S. W., Lynch, P. M., Koehly, L. M., et al. (2005). Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family members’ perceptions about the duty to inform and health professionals’ role in disseminating genetic information. Genetic Testing, 9(3), 261–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Koehly, L. M., Vernon, S. W., Baile, W. F., Kohlmann, W. K., et al. (2003). How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: Findings from a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 119(1), 78–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. (2002). Counseling about cancer. Strategies for genetic counseling. New York: Wiley-Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiloh, S. (2006). Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: A theoretical review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(5), 325–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiloh, S., Gerad, L., & Goldman, B. (2006). Patients’ information needs and decision-making processes: What can be learned from genetic counselees? Health Psychology, 25(2), 211–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talks, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, A., & English, V. (1999). Genetic privacy: Orthodoxy or oxymoron? Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2), 144–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Brocker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2006a). Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing. Annals of Oncology, 17(7), 1090–1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Brocker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2006b). Prognostic factors for hereditary cancer distress six months after BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing. European Journal of Cancer, 43(1), 71–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, S. W. (1999). Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: A review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 25, 101–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A., van Kessel, I., Kriege, M. G., Tops, C. M., Wijnen, J. T., Vasen, H. F., et al. (2005). Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: Compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures. Familial Cancer, 4(4), 295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. J., Forrest, K., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., Matthews, E., et al. (2004). Family communication about genetic risk: The little that is known. Community Genetics, 7(1), 15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was granted by the Swedish Cancer Fund, the Council for Medical Health Care Research in Southern Sweden, the Swedish Cancer and Allergy Fund, the Nilsson Cancer Fund, and the Cancer and Traffic Injury Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden

    C. Carlsson & M. Nilbert

  2. Department of Clinical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Clinical Research Unit, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    M. Nilbert

Authors
  1. C. Carlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Nilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Carlsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, C., Nilbert, M. Living with Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer; Experiences from and Impact of Genetic Testing. J Genet Counsel 16, 811–820 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9117-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9117-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation