We explored how individuals at-risk for HD who have or have not been tested make reproductive decisions and what factors are involved. We interviewed 21 individuals (8 with and 4 without the mutation, and 9 un-tested) in-depth for 2 hours each. At-risk individuals faced a difficult series of dilemmas of whether to: get pregnant and deliver, have fetal testing, have pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, adopt, or have no children. These individuals weighed competing desires and concerns: their own desires vs. those of spouses vs. broader moral concerns (e.g., to end the disease; and/or follow dictates against abortion) vs. perceptions of the interests of current or future offspring. Quandaries arose of how much and to whom to feel responsible. Some changed their perspectives over time (e.g., first “gambling,” then being more cautious). These data have critical implications for genetic counselors and other health care workers and future research, particularly as more genetic tests become available.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adam, S., Wiggins, S., Whyte, P., Bloch, M., Shokeir, M. H. K., Soltan, H., Meschino, W., et al. (1993). Five year study of prenatal testing for Huntington's disease: Demand, attitudes, and psychological assessment. J Med Gen, 30, 549–556.
Alonso Vilatela, M. E., Ochoa Morales, A., Garcia de la Cadena, C., Ruiz Lopez, I., Martinez Aranda, C., & Villa, A. (1999). Predictive and prenatal diagnosis of Huntington's disease: Attitudes of Mexican neurologists, psychiatrists, and psychologists. Arch Med Res, 30(4), 320–324.
Bankole, A., Sing, S., & Haas, T. (1998). Reasons why women have induced abortions: Evidence form 27 countries. Int Fam Plan Perspect, 24(3), 117–152.
Braude, P. R., De Wert, G. M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Pettigrew, R. A., & Geraedts, J. P. (1998). Non-disclosure preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington's disease: Practical and ethical dilemmas. Prenat Diagn, 18, 1422–1426.
Broadstock, M., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. Eur J Human Genet, 8, 731–738.
Case, D., Andrews, J. E., Johnson, J. D., Allard, S. L. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. J Med. Libr Assoc, 93, 353–362.
Coleman, P. K., Reardon, D. C., Strahan, T., & Cougle, J. R. (2005). The psychology of abortion: A review and suggestions for future research. Psychol Health, 20, 237–271.
Craufurd, D., Dodge, A., Kerzin-Storrar, L., & Harris, R. (1989). Uptake of presymptomatic predictive testing for Huntington's disease. Lancet, 2(8663), 603–605.
Creighton, S., Almqvist, E. W., MacGregor, D., Fernandez, B., Hogg, H., Beis, J., Welch, J. P., et al. (2003). Predictive, pre-natal and diagnostic genetic testing for Huntington's disease: The experience in Canada from 1987 to 2000. Clin Genet, 63, 462–475.
Delatycki, M. B. (2003). Commentary on Spriggs: Genetically selected baby free of inherited disposition to early onset Alzheimer's disease. J Med Ethics, 29, 120.
Downing, C. (2005). Negotiating responsibility: Case studies of reproductive decision-making and prenatal genetic testing in families facing Huntington Disease. J Genet Counseling, 14(3), 219–234.
Drake, H., Reid, M., & Marteau, T. (1996). Attitudes towards termination for fetal abnormality: Comparisons in three European countries. Clin Genet, 49, 134–140.
Elger, B., & Harding, T. (2003). Huntington's disease: Do future physicians and lawyers think eugenically? Clin Genet, 64(4), 327–338.
Evers-Kiebooms, G., Nys, K., Harper, P., Zoetewij, M., Dürr, A., Jacopini, G., Yapijakis, C., & Simpson, S. (2002). Predictive DNA-testing for Huntington's disease and reproductive decision making: A European collaborative study. Eur J Hum Genet, 10, 167–176.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav, 21(3), 219–239.
Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Goizet, C., Lesca, G., & Durr, A. (2002). Presymptomatic testing in Huntington's disease and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias. Neurology, 59, 1330–1336.
Hayden, M. (2000). Predictive testing for Huntington's disease: The calm after the storm. The Lancet, 356, 1944–1945.
Healy, M. (2003). Embryo diagnosis stirs controversy. The Los Angeles Times, July 29, 2003.
Henn, W. (2000). Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: A challenge for ethical guidelines. J Med Ethics, 26(6), 444–446.
Houlihan, G. D. (1999). The evaluation of the ‘stages of change’ model for use in counselling client's undergoing predictive testing for Huntington's disease. J Adv Nursing, 29, 1137–1143.
Hundert, E. M. (1987). A model for ethical problem solving in medicine, with practical applications. Am J Psychiatry, 144, 839–846.
Johannes, L. (2004). A screening test for high-risk mothers. Wall Str J, Nov. 23, 2004.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 184, 1124–1131.
Kero, A., Högberg, U., Jacobsson, L., & Lalos, A. (2001). Legal abortion: A painful necessity. Soc Sci Med, 53, 1481–1490.
Kero, A., Lalos, A., Högberg, U., & Jacobsson, L. (1999). The male partner involved in legal abortion. Hum Reprod, 14, 2669–2675.
Kessler, S., Field, T., Worth, L., & Mosbarger, H. (1987). Attitudes of persons at risk for Huntington disease toward predictive testing. Am J Med Genet, 26(2), 259–270.
Kirshenbaum, S. B., Hirky, A. E., Correale, J., Goldstein, R. B., Johnson, M. O., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2004). Throwing the dice: Pregnancy decision-making among HIV-positive women in four U.S. cities. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 36(3), 106–113.
Klitzman, R. (1997). Being positive: The lives of men and women with HIV. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, Inc.
Klitzman, R., & Bayer, R. (2003). Mortal secrets: Truth and lies in the age of AIDS. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lavery, S. A., Aurell, R., Turner, C., Castellu, C., Veiga, A., Barri, P. N., & Winston, R. M. (2002). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients’ experiences and attitudes. Hum Reprod, 17, 2464–2467.
Lesca, G., Goizet, C., & Dürr, A. (2002). Predictive testing in the context of pregnancy: Experience in Huntington's disease and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. J Med Genet, 39, 522–525.
Littell, J. H., & Girvin, H. (2002). Stages of change: A critique. Behav Modif, 26, 223–273.
Maat-Kievit, A., Vegter-van der Vlis, M., Zoeteweij, M., Losekoot, M., van Haeringen, A., Kanhai, H., & Roos, R. (1999). Experience in prenatal testing for Huntington's disease in The Netherlands: procedures, results and guidelines (1987–1997). Prenat Diagn, 19, 450–457.
Markel, D. S., Young, A. B., & Penney, J. B. (1987). At-risk persons attitudes toward presymptomatic and prenatal testing of Huntington disease in Michigan. Am J Med Genet, 26, 295–305.
Mastromauro, C., Myers, R. H., & Berkman, B. (1987). Attitudes toward presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease. Am J Med Genet, 26(2), 271–282.
Meiser, B., & Dunn, S. (2000). Psychological impact of genetic testing for Huntington's disease: An update of the literature. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 69, 574–578.
Meissen, G. J., & Berchek, R. L. (1987). Intended use of predictive testing by those at risk for Huntington disease. Am J Med Genet, 26(2), 283–293.
Richards, F. (2004). Couples’ experiences of predictive testing and living with the risk or reality of Huntington Disease: A qualitative study. Am J Med Genet, 126A, 170–182.
Richards, F. H., & Rea, G. (2005). Reproductive decision making before and after predictive testing for Huntington's disease: An Australian perspective. Clin Genet, 67, 404–411.
Richards, F., & Williams, K. (2004). Impact on couple relationships of predictive testing for Huntington Disease: A longitudinal study. Am J Med Genet, 126A, 161–169.
Robertson, J. A. (2005). Ethics and the future of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online www.rbmonline.com, 10 Supp. 1 97–101.
Robertson, J. A. (2003). Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: The ethical debate: Ethical issues in the new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod, 18, 465–471.
Robins-Wahlin, T. B., Backman, L., Lundin, A., Haegermark, A., Winblad, B., & Anvret, M. (2000). High suicidal ideation in persons testing for Huntington's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 102(3), 150–161.
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q, 15, 175–183.
Sermon, K., DeRijcke, M., Lissens, W., DeVos, A., Platteau, P., Bonduelle, M., Devroey, P., et al. (2002). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington's disease with exclusion testing. Eur J Human Genet, 10, 591–598.
Sihvo, S., Bajos, N., Ducot, B., Kaminski, M., & the Cocon Group (2003). Women's life cycle and abortion decision in unintended pregnancies. J Epidemiol Community Health, 57, 601–605.
Simpson, S. A., Harper, P. S., & United Kingdom Huntington's Disease Prediction Consortium. (2001). Prenatal testing for Huntington's disease: Experience within the UK 1994–1998. J Med Genet, 38(5), 333–335.
Sobel, S. K., & Brookes Cowan, D. (2000). Impact of genetic testing for Huntington Disease on the family system. Am J Med Genet, 90, 49–59.
Spriggs, M. (2002). Genetically selected baby free of inherited predisposition to early-onset Alzheimer's disease. J Med Ethics, 28, 290.
Stern, H. J., Harton, G. L., Sisson, M. E., Jones, S. L., Fallon, L. A., Thorsell, L. P., Getlinger, M. E., et al. (2002). Non-disclosing preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington disease. Prenat Diagn, 22, 503–507.
Sorenson, J. R., & Wertz, D. C. (1986). Couple agreement before and after genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet, 25, 549–555.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research—techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Taylor, S. D. (2005). Predictive genetic test decisions for Huntington's Disease: Elucidating the test/no-test dichotomy. J Health Psychol, 10, 597–612.
Taylor, C. A., & Myers, R. H. (1997). Long-term impact of Huntington Disease linkage testing. Am J Med Genet, 70, 365–370.
Thomassen, R., Tibben, A., Niermeijer, M. F., vand der Does, E., van de Kamp, J. J. P., & Verhage, F. (1993). Attitudes of Dutch general practitioners towards presymptomatic DNA-testing for Huntington disease. Clin Genet, 43, 63–68.
Tibben, A., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Vegter-van der Vlis, M., Niermeijer, M. F., Frets, P. G., van de Kamp, J. J., Roos, R. A., Rooijmans, H. G., & Verhage, F. (1993). Presymptomatic DNA Testing for Huntington Disease: Identifying the Need for Psychological Intervention. Am J Med Genet, 48, 137–144.
Towner, D., & Loewy, R. S. (2002). Ethics of preimplantation diagnosis for a woman destined to develop early-onset Alzheimer disease. JAMA, 287, 1038–1040.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Tyler, A., Quarrell, O. W., Lazarou, L. P., Meredith, A. L., & Harper, P. S. (1990). Exclusion testing in pregnancy for Huntington's disease. J Med Genet, 27, 488–495.
Uniform Adoption Act. (1994). Available at www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/fnact99/1990s/uaa94.htm. Accessed March 27, 2006.
Verlinsky, Y., Rechitsky, S., Verlinsky, O., Masciangelo, C., Lederer, K., & Kuliev, A. (2002). Preimplantation diagnosis for early-onset Alzheimer disease caused by V717L mutation. JAMA, 287, 1018–1021.
Wertz, D. C., & Sorenson, J. R. (1986). Client reactions to genetic counseling: Self-reports of influence. Clin Genet, 30, 494–502.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank Kristin Skrabut, Renée C. Fox, Mary DuVernay, Carol Moskowitz, and Paula Lieber for their assistance with this manuscript. Funding for this research was provided through grant 5-R01-HG002431-01 from the National Human Genome Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
APPENDIX. A. Sample Questions from Semi-Structured Interview Guide
APPENDIX. A. Sample Questions from Semi-Structured Interview Guide
•When did you learn that you were at risk of
HD, and what was your reaction to it at that
time?
•How do you feel about being at risk of HD?
•Have you had genetic testing done?
•If so, what was the result, and how did you respond?
•How did you decide whether to have genetic testing done or not?
•How has being at risk for HD affected you?
•Do you have children? If so, how many?
•How have you made decisions about having children?
•Has HD affected your decisions to have
children in any way? If so, how?
•Has HD affected decisions by other members
of your family about having children? If so,
how?
•Do you have any other thoughts about these issues?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klitzman, R., Thorne, D., Williamson, J. et al. Decision-Making About Reproductive Choices Among Individuals At-Risk for Huntington's Disease. J Genet Counsel 16, 347–362 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9080-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9080-1