Abstract
The current study examined the utility of expert testimony of the battered person syndrome (BPS) in a case of duress and the extent to which defendant gender, defendant sexual orientation, and participant gender influence mock jury decisions in a case of duress. Participants (N = 413) read a scenario based on U.S. v. Dixon (2006) and answered questions assessing verdict, guilt, sentence length, duress legal elements, and attributes typically ascribed to victims of abuse. Results showed heterosexual female defendants were assigned the lowest sentences and met more of the legal elements of duress (i.e., were coerced, more likely to be believed, and purchased a gun to prevent harm) and attributes (i.e., experienced severe abuse, learned helplessness) compared to other defendants. When mock jurors received expert testimony, they provided lower rates of guilt and sentencing for defendants. Results also showed the inclusion of BPS expert testimony increased ratings for many of the legal elements of duress and attributes typically associated with intimate partner violence. In addition, results suggested that while heterosexual female defendants are more likely to be believed in a case of duress, expert testimony of BPS is helpful to all defendants. Limitations and future directions for research and practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackmun, J. (1990). Emerging images of severely battered women and the criminal justice system. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 121–130.
Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2009). Gay stereotypes: the use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles, 61, 783–793.
Crocker, L. (1985). The meaning of equality for battered women who kill men in self-defense. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 8, 121–139.
Dando v. Yukins, 461 F.3d 791, U.S. App. (2006).
Davies, M., & McCartney, S. (2003). Effects of gender and sexuality on judgments of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 391–398.
Dixon v. United States, 413 F. 3d 520 1 (2006).
Faigman, D. L. (1987). Discerning justice when battered women kill. Hastings Law Journal, 39(1), 207–227.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gosling, S.D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies: a comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.
Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2005). Criminal prosecution of domestic violence offenses: an investigation of factors predictive of court outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(6), 612–642.
Jenkins, P., & Davidson, B. (1990). Battered women in the criminal justice system: an analysis of gender stereotypes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8(2), 171–180.
Kern, R., Libkuman, T. M., & Temple, S. L. (2007). Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors’ sentencing decisions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1515–1535.
Kingsnorth, R., & MacIntosh, R. (2007). Intimate partner violence: the role of suspect gender in prosecutorial decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 460–495.
Light, M. H. (1995). Multiple regression and correlation. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 18–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Maguigan, H. (1991). Battered women and self-defense: myths and misconceptions in current reform proposals. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140(2), 379–460.
Mann, C. R. (1996). When women kill. Albany: State University of New York Press.
People v. Colberg, 182 Misc. 2d 798, 701 N. Y. S.2d 608 (1999).
People v. Romero, 8 Cal. 4th 728; 883 P.2d 388; 35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 270 (1994).
Plumm, K. M., & Terrance, C. A. (2009). Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom. Violence Against Women, 15, 186–205.
Poorman, P. B., Seelau, E. P., & Seelau, S. M. (2003). Perceptions of domestic abuse in same sex relationships and implications for criminal justice and mental health responses. Violence and Victims, 18, 659–669.
Ragatz, L., & Russell, B. (2010). Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: what influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case? Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 341–360.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192–232.
Russell, B. L., & Melillo, L. S. (2006). Attitudes toward battered women who kill: defendants typicality and judgments of culpability. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(2), 219–241.
Russell, B., Ragatz, L. L., & Kraus, S. W. (2009). Does ambivalent sexism influence verdicts for heterosexual and homosexual defendants in a self-defense case? Journal of Family Violence, 24, 145–157.
Russell, B., Ragatz, L. L., & Kraus, S. W. (2010). Self-defense and legal decision making: the role of defendant and victim gender and gender-neutral expert testimony of the battered partner’s syndrome. Partner Abuse, 1(4), 399–419.
Schuller, R. A., McKimmie, B. M., & Janz, T. (2004). The impact of expert testimony in trials of battered women who kill. Psychiatry, Psychology, and the Law, 11(1), 1–12.
Schuller, R. A., & Rzepa, S. (2002). Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: its impact on jurors’ decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 26(6), 655–673.
Seelau, S. M., & Seelau, E. P. (2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay, and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 363–371.
Skidmore, W. C., Linsenmeier, J. A., Bailey, J. M. (2006). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(6), 685–697.
Spohn, C. (1999). Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: is chivalry dead? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 365–399.
Spohn, C., & Spears, J. W. (1997). Gender and case processing decisions: a comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women and Criminal Justice, 8, 29–59.
State v. B. H., 183 N.J. 171; 870 A.2d 273 (2005).
State v. Daoud, 141 N.H. 142; 679 A.2d 577 (1996).
State v. Dunn, 243 Kan. 414; 758 P.2d 718 (1988).
Terrance, C., Matheson, K, and Spanos, N. P. (2000). Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 24(2), 207–229.
Terrance, C., & Matheson, K. (2003). Undermining reasonableness: expert testimony in a case involving a battered woman who kills. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 37–45.
United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394 409-10 62 L.Ed. 2d 575, 100 S. Ct. 624 (1980).
United States v. Dixon, 04-10250 5 Ct. (2005).
United States v. Gant, 691 F.2d 1159, 1162-63 (5th Cir. 1982).
United States v. Harper, 802 F.2d 115, 117 (5th Cir. 1986).
United States v. Johnson, 956 F.2d 894; U.S. App. (1992).
United States v. Liu, 960 F.2d 449, 453 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 113 S. Ct. 418 (1992).
United States v. Ramos-Oseguera, 120 F.3d 1028; U.S. App. (1997).
United States v. Rouse, 168 F.3d 1371; 335 U.S. App. D.C. 71 (1999).
United States v. Sebresos, 972 F.2d 1347, U.S. App. (1992).
United States v. Weischedel, 201 F.3d 1250; U.S. App. (2000).
United States v. Willis, 38 F.3d 170; U.S. App. (1994).
Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.
Walker, L. E., Thyfault, R. K., & Browne, A. (1982). Beyond the juror’s ken: battered women. Vermont Law Review, 7, 1–14.
Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
White, B. H., Kurpius, S., Robinson, E. (2002). Effects of victim sex and sexual orientation on perceptions of rape. Sex Roles, 46(5/6), 191–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, B., Ragatz, L. & Kraus, S.W. Expert Testimony of the Battered Person Syndrome, Defendant Gender, and Sexual Orientation in a Case of Duress: Evaluating Legal Decisions. J Fam Viol 27, 659–670 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9459-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9459-8