Abstract
This study explored the relationships between college students’ self-identification as recipients and/or perpetrators of abuse in their dating relationships and abusive behaviors reported. A cross-sectional examination of 1,530 undergraduate students was conducted. Results indicated that one in four college students were involved in a physically abusive dating relationship (involving at least two acts of physically violent behavior), and that over 85% of them failed to self-identify as ever having received and/or perpetrated any act of physical abuse. College students involved in abusive dating relationships were more likely than those not in abusive dating relationships to be in a relationship of a longer duration, to have been in a previous abusive dating relationship, and to be more accepting, in general, of physical abuse as a means of conflict resolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, J., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2003). Do beliefs about aggression predict physical aggression to partners? Aggressive Behavior, 29, 41–54.
Banyard, V. L., & Cross, C. (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence: understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women, 14, 998–1013.
Beyers, J. M., Leonard, J. M., Mays, V. K., & Rosen, L. A. (2000). Gender differences in the perception of courtship abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 451–466.
Bryant, S. A., & Spencer, G. A. (2003). University students’ attitudes about attributing blame in domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 369–376.
Carr, J. L., & VanDeusen, K. M. (2002). The relationship between family of origin violence and dating violence in college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 630–646.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States–2001. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services.
Cousins, A. J., & Gangestad, S. W. (2007). Perceived threats of female infidelity, male proprietariness, and violence in college dating couples. Violence and Victims, 22, 651–668.
Deal, J. E., & Wampler, K. S. (1986). Dating violence: the primacy of previous experience. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 457–471.
DeKeseredy, W. S., & Saunders, D. G. (1997). The meanings and motives for women’s use of violence in Canadian college dating relationships: results from a national survey. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 199–222.
Eaton, D. K., Davis, K. S., Barios, L., Brener, N. D., & Noonan, R. K. (2007). Associations of dating violence victimization with lifetime participation, co-occurrence, and early initiation of risk behaviors among U.S. high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 585–602.
Eisikovits, Z., Goldblatt, H., & Winstok, Z. (1999). Partner accounts of intimate violence: towards a theoretical model. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 80, 606–619.
Fiebert, M. S., & Gonzalez, D. M. (1997). College women who initiate assaults on their male partners and the reasons offered for such behavior. Psychological Reports, 80, 583–590.
Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. A. (1991). Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Family Relations, 40, 51–57.
Forke, C. M., Myers, R. K., Catallozzi, M., & Schwarz, D. F. (2008). Relationship violence among female and male college undergraduate students. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 162, 634–641.
Hettrich, E. L., & O’Leary, K. D. (2007). Females’ reasons for their physical aggression in dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1131–1143.
James, W. H., West, C., Deters, K. E., & Armijo, E. (2000). Youth dating violence. Adolescence, 35, 455–465.
Johnson, J. M., & Ferraro, K. J. (1988). Courtship violence: survey vs. empathic understandings of abusive conduct. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 9, 175–186.
Katz, J., Kuffel, S. W., & Coblentz, A. (2002). Are there gender differences in sustaining dating violence? An examination of frequency, severity, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 247–271.
Kaura, S. A., & Lohman, B. J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: a comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 367–381.
Lewis, S. F., & Fremouw, W. (2001). Dating violence: a critical review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 105–127.
Lloyd, S. A. (1991). The darkside of courtship: violence and sexual exploitation. Family Relations, 40, 14–20.
Luthra, R., & Gidycz, C. A. (2006). Dating violence among college men and women: evaluation of a theoretical model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 717–731.
Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97–102.
Marcus, R. F. (2004). Dating partners’ responses to simulated dating conflict: violence chronicity, expectations, and emotional quality of relationship. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 163–188.
Marcus, R. F., & Swett, B. (2002). Violence and intimacy in close relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 570–586.
Marshall, L. L., & Rose, P. (1990). Premarital violence: the impact of family of origin violence, stress, and reciprocity. Violence and Victims, 5, 51–64.
McKinney, K. (1986a). Measures of verbal, physical, and sexual dating violence by gender. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 14, 55–60.
McKinney, K. (1986b). Perceptions of courtship violence: gender difference and involvement. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 14, 61–66.
Miller, L. M. (1999). Self-identification of participation in abusive dating relationships, abusive behaviors reported, and self-esteem in college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation data. University of Maryland College Park.
Nabors, E. L., Dietz, T. L., & Jasinski, J. L. (2006). Domestic violence beliefs and perceptions among college students. Violence and Victims, 21, 779–795.
Perry, A. R., & Fromuth, M. E. (2005). Courtship violence using couple data. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1078–1095.
Roscoe, B. (1985). Courtship violence: acceptable forms and situations. College Student Journal, 19, 389–393.
Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: husband-abuse or self-defense? Violence and Victims, 1, 47–60.
Shook, N. J., Gerrity, D. A., Jurich, J., & Segrist, A. E. (2000). Courtship violence among college students: a comparison of verbally and physically abusive couples. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 1–22.
Slep, A. M., Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., & O’Leary, K. D. (2001). Two new measures of attitudes about the acceptability of teen dating aggression. Psychological Assessment, 13, 306–318.
Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Patterns of physical and sexual abuse for men and women in dating relationships: a descriptive analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 63–76.
Straus, M. A. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790–811.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor/Doubleday.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1995). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Paper presented at the 1995 annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Portland, OR.
Worden, A. P., & Carlson, B. E. (2005). Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: results of a public opinion survey: beliefs about causes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1219–1243.
Yllo, K. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, L.M. Physical Abuse in a College Setting: A Study of Perceptions and Participation in Abusive Dating Relationships. J Fam Viol 26, 71–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9344-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9344-2