Abstract
To date, few studies have analyzed the relationship that economic deprivation and social disorganization have with disaggregated family homicide types. This study utilized data from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports from years 2000–2007 in order to explore the effect social structural variables have on rates of family homicides—specifically, intimate partner, filicide, parricide, and siblicide. Cities with more than 100,000 residents were analyzed using ordinary least squares regression. Findings showed that economic deprivation had a significant and positive relationship with all types of disaggregated family homicides, but were stronger for intimate partner homicides and filicides. Social disorganization, however, showed a negative relationship with these types of homicides. Our study provides a basis for possible policy implications, such as economically based institutions to help those in need before financial strain reaches a point of violence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
One reviewer asked whether we employed an average population estimate for the years of 2000–2007 or if we only relied on 2000 census data. As indicated in the text we employed 2000 Census population data. In order to ensure the validity of this approach, we conducted two tests. First, we calculated the average population for each city for the years of 2000–2007. This examination confirmed the cities included in the analyses. It is important to note, however, that ten of the cities averaged slightly under one-hundred thousand residents (i.e., some cities averaged from ninety-eight to one-hundred thousand). Due to slight difference we decided against excluding these cities. Second, we calculated population density with the average population, and reran the regression analyses with this measure. In both sets of tests, the results were consistent with those presented here-in, and thus we present our OLS regression results on the various homicide rates for parsimony and consistency with the other Census variables employed in the study.
It is important to note that the bulk of social disorganization research has been conducted with smaller units of analyses (i.e., census tracts and neighborhoods). There have been studies; however, that test this construct in larger units such as cities, counties, and standard statistical areas (i.e., Beaulieu and Messner 2010 [examined cities]; McCall and Nieuwbeerta 2007 [examined cities]; Land et al. 1990 [examined cities, counties, and standard statistical areas]; Melde 2006 [examined counties]; Oh 2005 [examined cities]; Osgood and Chambers 2000 [examined counties]. This study models its methods on the aforementioned studies. The reason for this is twofold. First, the Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) does not report homicide data for geographic units smaller than cities. Second, family homicides are extremely rare. Therefore, employing smaller units would not yield the necessary cases to conduct an analysis of this type. Nonetheless, it important to note that employing cities and other bigger geographic units in the testing of social disorganization constructs poses the threat of not remaining theoretically “true” to the original assumptions posed by Shaw and McKay (1942).
A multi-step approach was utilized when creating the components in order to ensure they are independent from each other. First, a factor analysis of all the theoretical relevant independent variables measuring social structure (see Table 1) included in the component matrix was employed. The results are available in appendix. The second step, involved selecting the variables in each component that had a factor score of .700 or more (see Kim and Mueller 1978). As seen in Appendix seven variables fit this criterion. In order to confirm the findings of the first component we reran the factor analyses with these variables. We also included in this analysis the % homeowner variable because it almost met the criteria with a factor loading of −.640. The results of this analyses yielded similar results from those presented in the table above (i.e., all of the variables with the exception of % home owner had factor loading above .700—% home owner had a factor loading of −.599). As result, we excluded % homeowner from the component and based our economic deprivation measure on the seven variables presented in Table 2. We then reran the factor analyses with only the three variables not included in the first component (i.e., % homeowner, % foreign born, and population density). When examined separately these variables yielded factor loading over .700 (See Table 2). As result, we used these variables to create our second component—social disorganization.
Shaw and McKay (1942) originally posited that communities with high number of immigrants from different countries could be related to high crime rates due to culture conflict through the inability of immigrants to communicate with one another in order to deal with community problems due to language barriers. This notion has recently been debunked with new research that shows a negative relationship between immigration and crime (Stowell et al. 2009).
One reviewer appropriately pointed out that some of the outcome measures examined here had more ‘zero incidents’ (i.e., no specific types of homicides), which has the potential to skew the outcome variables modeled. This would make OLS regression susceptible to the skewed distribution and would have the potential to bias our estimates (see Long 1997). Consistent with the approach presented by Osgood (2000) dealing with the same situation (i.e., aggregate crime rates), we performed a two-step process to test for this issue. First, we re-estimated our OLS models using logged dependent variables. Second, we conducted count regression models, which specifically tests for an overdispersed outcome with a probability chi-square distribution. In four of the six models, the p value >.05, which indicated the outcome variable did not suffer from overdispersion (Long and Freese 2003: 269–70). When the distribution was not skewed, we used Poisson regression, and when it was skewed we used Negative Binomial estimation. In both sets of tests, the results were consistent with those presented here-in, and thus we present our OLS regression results on the various homicide rates for parsimony and consistency with prior research.
In order to shed some light into this unexpected finding we re-estimated the models testing each of the social disorganization variables independently from each other. The independent regression analyses suggest that the negative effect with social disorganization is being driven by the percentage foreign born variable. Percent foreign born had a significant negative relationship in all, but one, of the models we estimated (i.e., total homicides, total family homicides, IPH, filicide, and siblicide). Population density, on the other hand did not reach significance in of the models, and percent homeowners was only significant in the total homicide model.
References
Almgren, G., Guest, A., Immerwahr, G., & Spittel, M. (1998). Joblessness, family disruption, and violent death in Chicago, 1970–1990. Social Forces, 76(4), 1465–1493.
Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Avakame, E. F. (1998). How different is violence in the home? An examination of some correlates of stranger and intimate homicide. Criminology, 36(3), 601–632.
Beaulieu, M., & Messner, S. F. (2010). assessing changes in the effect of divorce rates on homicide rates across large U.S. Cities, 1960–2000: revisiting the Chicago School. Homicide Studies, 14(1), 24–51.
Block, R. (1979). Community, environment, and violent crime. Criminology, 17(1), 46–57.
Browning, C. R. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(4), 833–850.
Bursik, R. J., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New York: Lexington Books.
Crutchfield, R. D. (1989). Labor stratification and violent crime. Social Forces, 68(2), 489–512.
Crutchfield, R. D., Geerken, M. R., & Gove, W. R. (1982). Crime rate and social integration: the impact of metropolitan mobility. Criminology, 20(3), 467–478.
Cubbin, C., Pickle, L. W., & Fingerhut, L. (2000). Social context and geographic patterns of homicide among US black and white males. American Journal of Public Health, 90(4), 579–587.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: A. de Gruyter.
Ewing, C. P. (1997). Fatal families: The dynamics of intrafamilial homicide. London: Sage.
Firstman, R., & Talan, J. (1997). The death of innocents. New York: Bantam Books.
Flewelling, R. L., & Williams, K. R. (1999). Categorizing homicides: The use of disaggregated data in homicide research. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 96–106). California: Sage.
Fowles, R., & Merva, M. (1996). Wage inequality and criminal activity: an extreme bounds analysis for the United States, 1975–1990. Criminology, 34(2), 163–182.
Fox, J. A., Levin, J., & Quinet, K. (2005). The will to kill: Making sense of senseless murder (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Group, Inc.
Friedman, S. H., & Friedman, J. B. (2010). Parents who kill their children. Pediatrics in Review, 31(1), 10–16.
Friedman, S. H., Horwitz, S. M., & Resnick, P. J. (2005). Child murder by mothers: a critical analysis of the current state of knowledge and a research agenda. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(9), 1578–1587.
Hammond, J. L. (1973). Two sources of error in ecological correlation. American Sociological Review, 38(6), 764–777.
Harris, G. T., Hilton, Z., Rice, M. E., & Eke, A. K. (2006). Children killed by genetic parents versus stepparents. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 85–95.
Heide, K. M. (1992). Why kids kill parents. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
Heide, K. M., & Petee, T. A. (2007). Parricide: an empirical analysis of 24 years of U.S. data. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(11), 1382–1399.
Hseih, C. C., & Pugh, M. D. (1993). Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: a meta-analysis of recent aggregated data studies. Criminal Justice Review, 18(2), 182–202.
Hunter, A. J. (1985). Private, parochial, and public school orders: The problem of crime and incivility in urban communities. In G. D. Suttles & M. N. Zald (Eds.), The challenges of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society (pp. 230–242). New Jersey: Ablex.
Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. California: Sage.
Kovandzic, T. V., Vieraitis, L. M., & Yeisley, M. R. (1998). The structural covariates of urban homicide: reassessing the impact of income inequality and poverty in the post-Reagan era. Criminology, 36(2), 569–599.
Kposowa, A. J., Breault, K. D., & Harrison, B. M. (1995). Reassessing the structural covariates of violent and property crimes in the USA: a county analysis. British Journal of Sociology, 46(1), 79–105.
Kruttschnitt, C., Gartner, R., & Ferraro, K. (2002). Womens involvement in serious interpersonal violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(6), 529–565.
Kubrin, C. E. (2003). Structural covariates of homicide rates: does type of homicide matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(2), 139–170.
Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: are there any invariances across time and social space. American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 922–963.
Lee, M. R. (2000). Concentrated poverty, race, and homicide. Sociological Quarterly, 41(2), 189–206.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Volume 7 of Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences. California: Sage.
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2003). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA. Texas: Stata.
Marleau, J. D., Auclair, N., & Millaud, F. (2006). Comparisons of factors associated with parricide in adults and adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 21(5), 321–325.
Matthews, R. A., Maume, M. O., & Miller, W. J. (2001). Deindustrialization, economic distress, and homicide rates in midsized rustbelt cities. Homicide Studies, 5(2), 83–113.
McCall, P. L., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2007). Structural covariates of homicide rates: a European city cross-national comparative analysis. Homicide Studies, 11(3), 167–188.
Melde, C. (2006). Social disorganization and violent crime in rural Appalachia. Journal of Crime & Justice, 29(2), 117–140.
Messner, S. F., & Tardiff, K. (1986). Economic inequality and levels of homicide: an analysis of urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 24(2), 297–317.
Miles-Doan, R. (1998). Violence between spouses and intimates: does neighborhood context matter? Social Forces, 77(2), 623–645.
Morenoff, J. D., & Sampson, R. J. (1997). Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition. Social Forces, 76(2), 623–645.
Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 73–102.
Oberman, M., & Meyer, C. L. (2008). When mothers kill. New York: New York University Press.
Oh, J. (2005). Social disorganization and crime rates in U.S. central cities: toward an explanation of urban economic change. Social Science Journal, 42(4), 569–582.
Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43.
Osgood, D. W., & Chambers, J. M. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: an analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38(1), 81–115.
Palermo, G. B. (2002). Murderous parents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(2), 123–143.
Patterson, B. E. (1991). Poverty, income inequality, and community crime rates. Criminology, 29(4), 755–776.
Peterson, R. D., Krivo, L. J., & Harris, M. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: do local institutions matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(1), 31–63.
Pizarro, J. M., & McGloin, J. M. (2006). Explaining gang homicides in Newark, NJ: collective behavior or social disorganization. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(2), 195–207.
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: a meta-analysis. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 32(1), 373.
Pridemore, W. A. (2002). What we know about social structure and homicide: a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Violence and Victims, 17(2), 127–151.
Rodriguez, B. (2009, March 26) Domestic violence kills 131 people in NC in ’08. USA Today. Retrieved from www.usatoday.com.
Roncek, D. (1981). Dangerous places: crime and residential environment. Social Forces, 60, 74–96.
Rosenfeld, R. (2009). Crime is the problem: homicide, acquisitive crime, and economic conditions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 287–306.
Rucker, P. (2009, April 8). Some link economy with spate of killings. The Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com.
Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: the structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(1), 17–40.
Sampson, R. J. (1987). Urban black violence: the effect of male joblessness and family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 93(2), 348–382.
Sampson, R. J. (1995). The community. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 193–216). California: ICS.
Sampson, R. J. (2006, March 11). Open doors don’t invite criminals: Is increased immigration behind the drop in crime? New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com.
Sampson, R. J., & Bean, L. (2006). Cultural mechanisms and killing fields: A revised theory of community-level racial inequality. In R. D. Peterson, L. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime: Inequalities of race, ethnicity and crime in America (pp. 8–38). New York: New York University Press.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
Sampson, R. J., & Lauritsen, J. L. (1994). Violent victimization and offending: Individual-, situational-, and community level risk factors. In A. J. Reiss Jr. & A. Roth (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence: Social influences, vol. 3 (pp. 1–114). Washington: National Academy Press.
Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–54). California: Stanford University Press.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 127–157.
Schwartz, L. L., & Isser, N. K. (2007). Child homicide: Parents who kill. Florida: Taylor & Francis Group.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency: A study of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
Shihadeh, E. S., & Flynn, N. (1996). Segregation and crime: the effect of black social isolation on the rates of black urban violence. Social Forces, 74(4), 1325–1352.
Shihadeh, E. S., & Ousey, G. C. (1998). Industrial restructuring and violence: the link between entry-level jobs, economic deprivation, and black and white homicide. Social Forces, 77(1), 729–751.
Singletary, B. (2008, Oct. 10). Man murders family over economy. The Reflector: The online student newspaper of Mississippi State University. Retrieved from media.www.reflector-online.com.
Skipp, C., & Campo-Flores, A. (2010, Feb. 11). Inside the minds of family annihilators. Newsweek. Retrieved from www.newsweek.com.
Stowell, J. L., Messner, S. F., McGreever, K. F., & Raffalovich, L. E. (2009). Immigration and the recent violent crime drop in the United States: a pooled, cross-sectional time-series analysis of metropolitan areas. Criminology, 47(3), 889–928.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. A., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Doubleday.
Titterington, V. B., Vollum, S., & Diamond, P. M. (2003). Neighborhoods and homicide: sex- and type-specific variations across three cities. Homicide Studies, 7(3), 263–288.
Underwood, R. C., & Patch, P. C. (1999). Siblicide: a descriptive analysis of sibling homicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 333–348.
Websdale, N. (1999). Domestic homicide. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Wilczynski, A. (1997). Child homicide. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd.
Williams, K. R. (1984). Economic sources of homicide: reestimating the effects of poverty and inequality. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 283–289.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8(1), 3–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diem, C., Pizarro, J.M. Social Structure and Family Homicides. J Fam Viol 25, 521–532 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9313-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9313-9