Abstract
Social values and status cause diverse obstacles for escaping abuse (e.g., belief in the sanctity of marriage vs. financial necessity to stay for survival). India provides a unique opportunity to explore the interplay of status and corresponding patriarchal values in relation to the incidence of domestic violence and how it is viewed, coped with, and psychologically impacting native women. Sixty-four women of Tamil Nadu, India were surveyed. Women of higher status were found to be less likely to acknowledge abuse as a societal problem, accurately identify abuse events, and seek help or report abuse. Women who had more realistic conceptions of abuse were more likely to seek help but also likely to experience more severe psychological distress. All of the women surveyed had symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder that were exacerbated by unsuspected variables. The implications of these findings are discussed in light of public health strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed-Gosh, H. (2004). Chattels of society: marital violence in India. Violence Against Women, 10, 94–120.
Budhwar, P. S., Woldu, H., & Ogbonna, E. (2008). A comparative analysis of cultural value orientations of Indians and migrant Indians in the USA. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(1), 79–105.
Central Intelligence Agency, CIA (2008). Central Intelligence Agency Factbook: India. Retreived on July 16th, 2008 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html#People.
Dasgupta, S. M., & Tripathi, C. B. (1984). Burnt wife syndrome. Annals of Academy of Medicine, 13, 37–42.
Dawood, N. J. (1997). The Koran with parallel Arabic text. New York: Penguin Books.
Ghadialli, R. & Kumar, P. (1988). Bride-burning: the psycho-social dynamics of dowry deaths. New Delhi, India: Sage.
Kapur, R., & Cossman, B. (1996). Subversive sites: Feminist engagements with law in India. New Delhi: Sage.
Kim-Goh, M., & Baello, J. (2008). Attitudes towards domestic violence in Koran and Vietnamese immigrant communities: implications for human services. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 647–654.
Kubany, E. S., (2004). PTSD Screening and Diagnostic Scale. Western Psychological Services.
Lawoko, S. (2008). Predictors of attitudes towards intimate partner violence: a comparative study of men in Zambia and Kenya. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1056–1074.
Lord Acton (1887). Letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton. Retrieved on June 29, 2009 from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/4647/John-Emerich-Edward-Dalberg-Acton-1st-Baron-Acton-of-Aldenham/4647suppinfo/Supplemental-Information.
Mahalingam, R., Haritatos, J., & Jackson, B. (2007). Essentialism and the cultural psychology of gender in extreme son preference communities in India. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77(4), 598–609.
Marmion, S. (2006). Global violence against women. In P. K. Lundberg-Love & S. L. Marmion (Eds.), “Intimate” violence against women: When spouses, partners, or lovers attack (pp. 145–154). Westport: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
Mitra, A., & Singh, P. (2007). Human capital attainment and gender empowerment: the Kerala paradox. Social Science Quarterly, 88(5), 1227–1242.
Morales, F. (1998). The Concept of Shakti: Hinduism as a Liberating force for Women. Retrieved on July 16th, 2008 from http://www.adishakti.org/forum/concept_of_shakti_hinduism_as_a_liberating_force_for_women_1-18-2005.htm .9.
National Crime Research Bureau of India (1999). Retrieved August 7, 2007, from www.ncrb.nic.in.
Oke, M. (2008). Remaking self after domestic violence: Mongolian and Austalian women’s narrative of recovery. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 148–155.
Omvedt, G. (1975). Caste, class and women’s liberation in India. Concerned Asian Scholars, 7, 43–49.
Palermo, G. B. (2004). The faces of violence (3rd ed.). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
Parliament, I. (2002). A protection from domestic violence bill. New Delhi: Indian Parliament.
Rastogi, M., & Therly, P. (2006). Dowry and its link to violence against women in India: Feminist psychological perspectives. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7(1), 66–77.
Rhatigan, D. L., Street, A. E., & Lowe, V. A. (2003). Understanding the process of leaving a abusive relationships: a critical review and update on the literature. Paper presented to the Annual meeting for the International Research Conference for Family Violence, Portsmouth, NH.
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: a test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
Straus, M. A. (2007). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of the revised conflict tactics scales: a study of university student dating couples in 17 nations. Cross Cultural Research, 38, 407–432.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issue, 17, 283–316.
Weitzman, S. (2000). Not to people like us. New York: Basic Books.
Acknowledgments
A special thanks to the Alumni Legacy Grant of the University of Arizona Honor’s College and the Psi Chi Summer Research grant who funded this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tichy, L.L., Becker, J.V. & Sisco, M.M. The Downside of Patriarchal Benevolence: Ambivalence in Addressing Domestic Violence and Socio-Economic Considerations for Women of Tamil Nadu, India. J Fam Viol 24, 547–558 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9253-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9253-4