Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Co-occurrence of Child and Intimate Partner Maltreatment in the Family: Characteristics of the Violent Perpetrators

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study considers the characteristics associated with mothers and fathers who maltreat their child and each other in comparison to parents who only maltreat their child. One hundred and sixty-two parents who had allegations of child maltreatment made against them were considered. The sample consisted of 43 fathers (Paternal Family—PF) and 23 mothers (Maternal Family—MF) who perpetrated both partner and child maltreatment, together with 23 fathers (Paternal Child—PC) and 26 mothers (Maternal Child—MC) who perpetrated child maltreatment only. In addition, 2 fathers (Paternal Victim—PV) and 23 mothers (Maternal Victim—MV) were victims of intimate partner maltreatment and perpetrators of child maltreatment and 7 fathers (Paternal Non-abusive Carer—PNC) and 15 mothers (Maternal Non-abusive Carer—MNC) did not maltreat the child but lived with an individual who did. Within their family unit, 40.7% of parents perpetrated both intimate partner and child maltreatment. However, fathers were significantly more likely to maltreat both their partner and child than mothers and mothers were significantly more likely to be victims of intimate partner violence than fathers. PF fathers conducted the highest amount of physical and/or sexual child maltreatment while MC and MV mothers perpetrated the highest amount of child neglect. Few significant differences between mothers were found. PF fathers had significantly more factors associated with development of a criminogenic lifestyle than PC fathers. Marked sex differences were demonstrated with PF fathers demonstrating significantly more antisocial characteristics, less mental health problems and fewer feelings of isolation than MF mothers. MC mothers had significantly more childhood abuse, mental health problems, parenting risk factors and were significantly more likely to be biologically related to the child than PC fathers. This study suggests that violent families should be assessed and treated in a holistic manner, considering the effects of partner violence upon all family members, rather than exclusively intervening with the violent man.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index: Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, A. E., & Holden, G. W. (1998). The co-occurrence of spouse and physical child abuse: A review and appraisal. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(4), 578–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 313–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, S. K., Hagemeister, A. K., & Edleson, J. L. (2001). Case assessment and service receipt in families experiencing both child maltreatment and woman battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. D. (1989a). The naturalistic context of family violence and child abuse. In J. Archer & K. Browne (Eds.), Human aggression: Naturalistic approaches (pp. 182–216). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. D. (1989b). The health visitors role in screening for child abuse. Health Visitor, 62, 275–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. D. (1993). Violence in the family and its links to child abuse. In C. J. Hobbs & J. M. Wynne (Eds.), Clinical paediatrics: International practice and research (pp. 149–164). London: Baillarie Tindall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. D. (1995). Preventing child maltreatment through community nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. D., & Hamilton, C. E. (1999). Police recognition of links between spouse abuse and child abuse. Child Maltreatment, 4(2), 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. D., & Herbert, M. (1997). Preventing family violence. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K., & Saqi, S. (1988). Approaches to screening for child abuse and neglect. In K. Browne, C. Davies, & P. Stratton (Eds.), Early prediction and prevention of child abuse (pp. 57–85). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo, M. A., D’Ocon, A., & Dolz, L. (1996). Mother–child interactive patterns in abusive families versus nonabusive families: An observational study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 573–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coohey, C. (2004). Battered mothers who physically abuse their children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(8), 943–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. E., Kotch, J. B., & Everson, M. (2003). A Longitudinal study of modifying influences in the relationship between domestic violence and child maltreatment. Journal of Family Violence, 18(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, J. L., Milner, J. S., & Thomsen, C. (2001). Childhood physical abuse, early social support and risk for maltreatment: Current social support as a mediator of risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 93–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L., & Browne, K. D. (2003). Heterogeneity of spouse abuse: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 8, 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., & Browne, K. D. (2005). Risk factors and behavioral measures of parents abused as children: A mediational analysis of the intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment (Part II). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(1), 47–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J. L. (1999). The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering. Violence Against Women, 5, 134–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkov, A., & Davies, N. (1997). Solutions on the ground: A family mental health service? In P. Reder & S. Duncan (1999) (Eds.), Lost innocents: A follow up of fatal child abuse (pp. 41–61). London: Routledge.

  • Falshaw, L., & Browne, K. (1997). Adverse childhood experiences and violent acts of young people in secure accommodation. Journal of Mental Health, 6(5), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, E., & Pollock, S. (1998). Substitute care for sexually abused and sexually abusing children. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebert, M. S. (2001). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from http://www.vix.com/menmag/fiebert.htm.

  • Goddard, C., & Hillier, P. (1993). Child sexual abuse: Assault in a violent context. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 28(1), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, C. (2002). The co-occurrence of child maltreatment and domestic violence: Examining both neglect and child physical abuse. Child Maltreatment, 7(4), 349–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, K., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2002). Child abuse potential: A comparison of subtypes of martially violent men and nonviolent men. Journal of Family Violence, 17(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M., & Pearson, C. (1998). From periphery to center—Domestic violence in work with abused children. Bristol: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, A., & Maitra, B. (2000). Liaison between child and adult services. In P. Reder, M. McClure, & A. Jolley (Eds.), Family matters: Interfaces between child and adult mental health. London. Routledge.

  • McCloskey, L. A., Figueredo, A. J., & Koss, M. P. (1995). The effects of systemic family violence on children’s mental health. Child Development, 66, 1239–1261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory—III: Manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, N. J., & Browne, K. (1998). Theory and observation of attachment and its relation to child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(11), 1093–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, M. (1995). Predictors of child abuse in maritally violent families. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, J. D. (2003). Prevalence of children’s exposure to domestic violence and child maltreatment: Implications for prevention and intervention. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6(3), 161–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, P., & Duncan, S. (1999). Lost innocents: A follow up of fatal child abuse (pp. 41–61). London: Routledge.

  • Renzetti, C. (1999). The challenge to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 42–56). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S., Murphy, C. M., & O’Leary, K. D. (1989). Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M. (1996). Risk of physical abuse to children of spouse abusing parents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20(7), 589–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Psychiatrists (2002). Patients as parents: Addressing the needs, including the safety, of children whose parents have mental illness. Council Report CR105. London.

  • Rumm, P. D., Cummings, P., Krauss, M. R., Bell, M. A., & Rivara, F. P. (2000). Identified spouse abuse as a risk factor for child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(11), 1375–1381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger, S., Feldman, R. S., Ng-Mak, D. S., Mojica, E., Stockhammer, T., & Rosario, M. (2002). Effects of partner violence and physical child abuse on child behavior: A study of abused and comparison children. Journal of Family Violence, 17(1), 23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or self-defence? Violence and Victims, 1, 47–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1424–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, M. (1997). Double jeopardy: The link between child abuse and maternal depression in child and family social work. Child and Family Social Work, 2, 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1995). Trends in cultural norms and rates of partner violence: An update to 1992. In S. M. Stich & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes, consequences and solutions (pp. 30–33). Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1997). Physical assaults by women partners: A major social problem. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men and gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 210–221). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajima, E. A. (2000). The relative importance of wife abuse as a risk factor for violence against children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(11), 1383–1398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Dixon.

Additional information

Requests for reprints should be sent to Louise Dixon, Center for Forensic and Family Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

Appendix

Appendix

Coding Dictionary

Type of child and partner maltreatment (definitions were taken from Browne and Herbert 1997).

Physical—tissue injury (scratches, bruising, burns, welts) broken bones (including fractures and dislocations), and/or damage to internal organs

Sexual—inappropriate sexual touching, invitations and/or exhibitionism, inappropriate non-penetrative sexual interaction (digital penetration, fondling, masturbation), attempted, actual, anal or vaginal penetration, incest, coerced or forced penetration.

Neglect (child only)—withholding love and affection, non-organic failure to gain weight/thrive, frequent unavailability of parent or guardian

Psychological—verbal assault, denigration, humiliation, scapegoating, confusing atmosphere, rejection, withholding of food and drink, enforced isolation and restriction of movement.

Physically/sexually abused as a child

Record as present if the parent discloses that they were physically and/or sexually abused during their childhood (prior to 16 years of age)

Factors associated with juvenile delinquency

Juvenile substance abuse—Record as present if they used alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, amphetamine or other illegal drugs during their adolescence.

Fighting with peers at school—Record as present if there is evidence of them getting in several fights during their school years (3 or more).

Criminal history

Conviction for violent/sexual offence—record as present if the parent has received one or more criminal convictions for a violent and/or sexual offence.

Conviction for non-violent criminal offence—record as present if the parent has received 1 or more conviction for theft, fraud or driving offences

Adult dependency for drugs or alcohol

Record as present if the parent disclosed during interview and/or professional reports stated that they had a dependency for alcohol, cannabis, cocaine heroin amphetamine or other illegal drugs during adulthood.

Relationship History

Involvement in a past violent relationship/s—record as present if the parent discloses/stated in professional reports, that they have been physically/sexually abusive, physically or sexually abused or involved in reciprocal physical and/or sexual abuse in a past romantic relationship/s. Romantic relationship is defined by the parents perception/disclosure that a level of romantic and intimate attachment existed with that person.

Current relationship difficulties—record as present if the parent discloses frequent arguing or feels that the partner is not supportive or does not provide enough care in the relationship, or if it was stated in professional reports.

Mental health factors

Previous suicide attempt/ideation—record as present if the parent has attempted/ruminated about committing suicide in the past, or during/immediately after the index offence

Treated for mental illness/depression—code as present if the parent discloses a history of being treated for mental illness or depression

MCMI-III: Cluster A (odd/eccentric)—code as present if the parent scores a base rate of 75 or over on the Schizoid (1); Schizotypal (S); Paranoid (P) sub-scales.

MCMI-III: Cluster B (dramatic/emotional)—code as present if the parent scores a base rate of 75 or over on the Histrionic (4); Antisocial (6a); Narcissistic (5); Borderline (C) sub-scales.

MCMI-III: Cluster C (anxious/fearful)—code as present if the parent scores a base rate of 75 or over on the Avoidant (2a); Dependent (3); Compulsive (7) sub-scales.

Presence of a severe clinical syndrome—code as present if the parent scores a base rate of 75 or over on the following severe clinical syndromes; Thought disorder (SS); Major depression (CC); Delusional disorder (PP).

Parenting risk factors

  1. 1.

    Static

    Under 21 at child’s birth—code as present if the parent was under 21 years of age at the time of the child’s birth

    Not biologically related to the index child—code as present if the parent is not biologically related to the index child

  2. 2.

    Dynamic

    Residing with a violent adult—code as present if the parent is a known violent adult or is living with a known violent adult (i.e. that person has convictions for violence, or it is disclosed that they have been violent to past romantic partners, acquaintances, strangers or children).

    Feelings of isolation—code as present if the parent discloses that they felt isolated with no one to turn to

    Serious financial difficulties—code as present if the parent discloses/stated in professional reports that they experienced serious financial difficulties (not being able to make payments for basic needs such as food or rent or parenting equipment).

    Single parenthood—code as present if the parents discloses that they are bringing up the index child or children on their own, without the help of a partner. NB: just because an individual discloses they are having a romantic intimate relationship with a partner does not mean that they perceive that partner to have an active role/responsibility to bring up the child.

  3. 3.

    Child

    Index child has a physical or mental disability—code as present if the index child has a diagnosed mental or physical disability

Parenting risk factors—checklist score

Total Index of Need score

Record the presence of each risk factor below from the file information. If a risk factor is present, the score specified in brackets next to each factor is awarded. A Total Index of Need score is derived and recorded (maximum score of 25).

Single parent (3)

Mother or partner under 21 years of age (1)

Mother or partner not biologically related to child (1)

Mother or partner physically and/or sexually abused as a child (2)

Twins or less that 18 months between births (1)

Complications during birth/separated from baby at birth (1)

Infant seriously ill, premature or weighed under 2.5 kg at birth (2)

Child with physical or mental disabilities (1)

Feelings of isolation (1)

Serious Financial Problems (2)

Mother or partner treated for mental illness or depression (2)

Dependency for drugs or Alcohol (2)

Adult in the household with violent tendencies (3)

Mother or partner feeling indifferent about their baby (3)

Parenting stress factors—psychometric data

Parenting Stress Index: Child domain—code as present if the parent achieves a percentile score of 75 or above

Parenting Stress Index: Attachment—code as present if the parent achieves a percentile score of 75 or above

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, L., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Browne, K. et al. The Co-occurrence of Child and Intimate Partner Maltreatment in the Family: Characteristics of the Violent Perpetrators. J Fam Viol 22, 675–689 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9115-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9115-x

Keywords

Navigation