Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Measure of Court Response to Requests for Protection

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Are male victims of domestic violence provided the same protections as female victims? With increasing entanglement of custody and domestic violence law, the answer to this question is critical for fathers embroiled in disputes where allegations are sometimes made to secure custody of children. All non-impounded requests for Abuse Prevention Orders initiated in Massachusetts’ Gardner District Court, in the year 1997, involving opposite gender litigants were analyzed to determine if court response to the associated allegations is affected by the gender of those litigants. These orders were previously examined and male and female defendants were found similarly abusive. By studying the characteristics of each case, and overall court response at court hearings, a determination is made concerning any evident gender trends in the aggregate court response to requests for protection. Despite gender-neutral language of abuse prevention law (M.G.L. c. 209A), application of that law favors female plaintiffs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basile, S. (2004). Comparison of abuse alleged by same- and opposite-gender litigants as cited in requests for abuse prevention orders. J. Fam. Violence 19(1): 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazawa, E., Byrne, J., Hotaling, G. T., and Klein, A. (1999, July). Response to domestic violence in a pro-active court setting. Final report presented to the National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, NCJ No. 181427 C.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W., McWilliams, J., Hart, B., and Stuehling, J. (1994). Court response to petitions for civil protection orders. J. Interpers. Violence 9: 503–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, A., Smith, B., and Newmark, L. (1993). Court Processing of Restraining Orders for Domestic Violence Victims, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, A., and Smith, E. B. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In: Buzawa, E., and Buzawa, C. (eds.), Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work? Sage Publications, London, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, A. L., Simonidis, K. M., and Simonidis, L. L. (1987). Legal remedies for spousal abuse: Victim characteristics, expectations and characteristics. J. Fam. Violence 2(3): 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaci, J. H. (1992). A study of protective orders issued under California’s Domestic Violence Prevention Act. Crim. Justice Rev. 17(1): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (1994). Re-abuse in a Population of Court-Restrained Male Batterers After Two Years: Development of a Predictive Model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAWA (1994). Title IV of the Crime Bill, U.S. Public Law 103–322, September 13, 1994.

  • VAWA II (2000). VAWA reauthorization bill. United States H.R. 1248, S. 2787.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Basile.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basile, S. A Measure of Court Response to Requests for Protection. J Fam Viol 20, 171–179 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-3653-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-3653-x

Keywords

Navigation