Skip to main content
Log in

Losing ground in the income hierarchy: relative deprivation revisited

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper discusses a one-parameter generalization of individual relative deprivation measures to a two-period setting that differs from earlier approaches. The parameter is, by definition, independent of the income distributions under consideration—it is to be chosen by a social planner. Its value has an intuitive interpretation: it represents the additional weight assigned to the income shortfalls associated with agents who passed the individual in question when moving from yesterday’s income distribution to today’s. Therefore, the choice of this parameter represents an important value judgment on the part of a social planner regarding the relative impact of being left behind. As a special case, it is illustrated how the well-known Yitzhaki index can be extended to this environment. Journal of Economic Literature Classification No.: D63.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bossert, W., D’Ambrosio, C.: Reference groups and individual deprivation. Econ. Lett. 90, 421–426 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., D’Ambrosio, C.: Dynamic measures of individual deprivation. Soc. Choice Welf. 28, 77–88 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., D’Ambrosio, C.: Proximity-sensitive individual deprivation measures. Econ. Lett. 122, 125–128 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R.: Relative deprivation and satisfaction ordering. Keio Economic Studies 34, 17–31 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., Chakraborty, A.B.: On indices of relative deprivation. Econ. Lett. 14, 283–287 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., Chattopadhyay, N.: An ethical index of relative deprivation. Research on Economic Inequality 5, 231–240 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., Chattopadhyay, N., Majumder, A.: Income inequality and relative deprivation. Keio Economic Studies 32, 1–15 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., Moyes, P.: Individual welfare, social deprivation and income taxation. Econ. Theory 21, 843–869 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio, C., Frick, J.R.: Individual wellbeing in a dynamic perspective. Economica 79, 284–302 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, D., Weymark, J.A.: A single-parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 22, 67–86 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y.: Gini indices and the redistribution of income. Int. Tax Public Financ. 7, 141–162 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U., Moyes, P.: An axiomatic characterization of Yitzhaki’s index of individual deprivation. Econ. Lett. 68, 263–270 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, L.: Upper boundedness for the measurement of relative deprivation. Rev. Income Wealth 56, 632–639 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G.S., Ok, E.A.: The measurement of income mobility: an introduction to the literature. In: Silber, J. (ed.) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement, pp 557–596. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J.D., Lambert, P.: Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient: comment. Q. J. Econ. 95, 567–573 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O., Rothschild, M.: The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Q. J. Econ. 87, 544–566 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäntti, M., Jenkins, S.P.: Income mobility. In: Atkinson, A. B., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2, pp 807–936. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N.: The relative deprivation curve and its applications. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 2, 384–394 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E.: On mobility. In: Giles, D., Ullah, A. (eds.) Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, pp 119–175. Marcel Dekker, New York (1998)

  • Paul, S.: An index of relative deprivation. Econ. Lett. 36, 337–341 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podder, N.: Relative deprivation, envy and economic inequality. Kyklos 49, 353–376 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W: Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Routledge, London (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., Bielawski, J., Falniowski, F.: A class of proximity-sensitive measures of relative deprivation. Econ. Lett. 160, 105–110 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S.A.: The American Soldier: Vol.I: Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymark, J.A.: Generalized Gini inequality indices. Math. Soc. Sci. 1, 409–430 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S.: Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient. Q. J. Econ. 93, 321–324 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S.: Relative Deprivation and the Gini coefficient: reply. Q. J. Econ. 95, 575–576 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Bossert.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Financial support from the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg and the Fonds de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture of Québec is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the associate editor Markus Jäntti and two referees for comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bossert, W., D’Ambrosio, C. Losing ground in the income hierarchy: relative deprivation revisited. J Econ Inequal 18, 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-019-09428-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-019-09428-4

Keywords

Navigation