Abstract
Atkinson’s Theorem (Atkinson J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263, 1970) is a classic result in inequality measurement. It establishes Lorenz dominance as a useful criterion for comparative judgements of inequality between distributions. If distribution A Lorenz dominates distribution B, then all indices in a broad class of measures must confirm A as less unequal than B. Recent research, however, shows that standard inequality theory cannot be applied to ordinal data (Zheng Res. Econ. Inequal. 16, 177–188, 2008), such as self-reported health status or educational attainment. A new theory in development (Abul Naga and Yalcin J. Health Econ. 27(6), 1614–1625, 2008) measures disparity of ordinal data as polarization. Typically a criterion used to compare distributions is the polarization relation as proposed by Allison and Foster (J. Health Econ. 23(3), 505–524, 2004). We characterize classes of polarization measures equivalent to the AF relation analogously to Atkinson’s original approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, R.A., Foster, J.E.: Measuring health inequality using qualitative data. J. Health Econ. 23 (3), 505–524 (2004)
Abul Naga, R.H., Yalcin, T.: Inequality measurement for ordered response health data. J. Health Econ. 27 (6), 1614–1625 (2008)
Abul Naga, R.H., Yalcin, T.: Median Independent Inequality Orderings, University of Aberdeen Business School working paper series Vol 3, pp. 1–25 (2010)
Apouey, B.: Measuring health polarization with self-assessed health data. Health Econ. 16 (9), 875–894 (2007)
Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)
Berry, K.J., Mielke, P.W.: Indices of ordinal variation. Percept. Mot. Skills 74, 576–578 (1992)
Blair, J., Lacy, M.G.: Statistics of ordinal variation. Sociol. Methods Res. 28 (251), 251–280 (2000)
Blackburn, M., Bloom, D.: What is happening to the middle class. Am. Demogr. 7 (1), 19–25 (1985)
Dasgupta, P., Sen, A.K., Starret, D.: Notes on the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 6, 180–187 (1973)
Diener, E., Lucas, R.E.: Personality and subjective well-being. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., chwarz, N. (eds.) (1999)
Esteban, J., Ray, D.: On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62, 819–852 (1994)
Di Tella, R., McCulloch, R.: Some uses of happiness data in economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 20 (1), 25–46 (2006)
Esteban, J., Ray, D.: Comparing polarization measures. In: Garfinkel, M.R., Skaperdas, S. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Peace and Conflict, Chapter 7. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)
Foster, J., Wolfson, M.: Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the US. J. Econ. Inequal. 8(2), 247–273 (2010)
Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A.: Happiness and Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2002)
Hemming, R., Keen, M.J.: Single-crossing conditions in comparisons of tax progressivity. J. Publ. Econ. 20, 373–380 (1983)
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B.: Developments in the measurement of subjective wellbeing. J. Econ. Perspect. 22, 3–24 (2006)
Kobus, M., Miłoś, P.: Inequality decomposition by population subgroups for ordinal data. J. Health Econ. 31, 15–21 (2012)
Layard, R.: Happiness. Lessons from a New Science, London: Allen Lane (2005)
Leik, R.K.: A measure of ordinal consensus. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 9, 85–90 (1966)
Levy, F., Murnane, R.J.: U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations. J. Econ. Lit. 30 (3), 1333–1381 (1992)
Oswald, A.J.: Happiness and economic performance. Econ. J. 107, 1815–1831 (1997)
Parker, D.S., Ram, P.: Greed and majorization, Tech. Report. Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles (1997)
Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica 52 (6), 1369–85 (1984)
Tsui, K.Y.: Multidimensional inequality and multidimensional generalized entropy measures: An axiomatic derivation. Soc. Choice Welf. 16 (1), 145–157 (1999)
Wang, Y.Q., Tsui, K.Y.: Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices. J. Publ. Econ. Theory 2, 349–363 (2000)
Wolfson, M.C.: When inequalities diverge. Am. Econ. Rev. P&P 94, 353–358 (1994)
Wolfson, M.C.: Divergent inequalities: theory and empirical results. Rev. Income Wealth 43, 401–421 (1997)
Zheng, B.: A new approach to measure socioeconomic inequality in health. J. Econ. Inequal. 9, 555–577 (2011)
Zheng, B.: Measuring inequality with ordinal data: a note. Res. Econ. Inequal. 16, 177–188 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The project was supported by National Science Centre in Poland and by a grant from the CERGE-EI Foundation under a program of the Global Development Network. All opinions expressed are those of the author and have not been endorsed by CERGE-EI or the GDN.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kobus, M. Polarization measurement for ordinal data. J Econ Inequal 13, 275–297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-014-9282-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-014-9282-y