Abstract
We show how classic source-decomposition and subgroup-decomposition methods can be reconciled with regression methodology used in the recent literature. We also highlight some pitfalls that arise from uncritical use of the regression approach. The LIS database is used to compare the approaches using an analysis of the changing contributions to inequality in the United States and Finland.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackorby, C., Donaldson, D., Auersperg, M.: A new procedure for the measurement of inequality within and among population subgroups. Can. J. Econ. 14, 665–685 (1981)
Blinder, A.S.: Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J. Hum. Resour. 8, 436–455 (1973)
Bourguignon, F.: Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica 47, 901–920 (1979)
Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H.G., Leite, P.G.: Beyond Oaxaca-Blinder: accounting for differences in household income distributions. J. Econ. Inequal. 6, 117–148 (2008)
Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., Gurgand, M.: Fast development with a stable income distribution: Taiwan, 1979–94. Rev. Income Wealth 47, 139–163 (2001)
Brandolini, A., Smeeding, T.M.: Income inequality in richer and OECD countries. In: Salverda, W., Nolan, N., Smeeding, T.M. (eds.) Oxford Handbook on Economic Inequality, chapter 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)
Brandolini, A., Smeeding, T.M.: Inequality patterns in western-type democracies: cross-country differences and time changes. In: Democracy, I., Representation, P.B., Anderson, R.S.F.C.J. (eds.) Democracy, Inequality and Representation. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2008)
Chantreuil, F., Trannoy, A.: Inequality decomposition values: the trade-off between marginality and consistency. Working Papers 99-24, THEMA, Université de Cergy-Pontoise (1999)
Charpentier, A., Mussard, S.: Income inequality games. J. Econ. Inequal. (2011, to appear)
Cowell, F.A.: On the structure of additive inequality measures. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, 521–531 (1980)
Cowell, F.A.: Inequality decomposition—three bad measures. Bull. Econ. Res. 40, 309–312 (1988)
Cowell, F.A.: Sampling variance and decomposable inequality measures. J. Econom. 42, 27–41 (1989)
Cowell, F.A., Jenkins, S.P.: How much inequality can we explain? A methodology and an application to the USA. Econ. J. 105, 421–430 (1995)
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N.M., Lemieux, T.: Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: a semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64, 1001–1044 (1996)
Ebert, U.: On the decomposition of inequality: Partitions into nonoverlapping sub-groups. In: Eichhorn, W. (ed.) Measurement in Economics. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (1988)
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J.A., Özler, B.: Reinterpreting between-group inequality. J. Econ. Inequal. 6, 231–245 (2008)
Fields, G.S.: Accounting for income inequality and its change: a new method with application to distribution of earnings in the United States. Res. Labor Econ. 22, 1–38 (2003)
Fields, G.S., Yoo, G.: Falling labor income inequality in Korea’s economic growth: patterns and underlying causes. Rev. Income Wealth 46, 139–159 (2000)
Fiorio, C., Jenkins, S.P.: Regression-based inequality decomposition, following Fields (2003). UK Stata User Group meeting, 10 September 2007
Foster, J.E., Shneyerov, A.A.: A general class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econ. Theory 14, 89–111 (1999)
Foster, J.E., Shneyerov, A.A.: Path independent inequality measures. J. Econ. Theory 91, 199–222 (2000)
Gornick, J.C., Smeeding, T.M.: The Luxembourg income study. In: Darity, W.A.J. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 2nd edn., pp. 419–422. Macmillan, Detroit (2008)
Jenkins, S.P.: Accounting for inequality trends: Decomposition analyses for the UK. Economica 62, 29–64 (1995)
Kanbur, S.M.N.: The policy significance of decompositions. J. Econ. Inequal. 4, 367–374 (2006)
Lasso de la Vega, C., Urrutia, A.: Path independent multiplicatively decomposable inequality measures. Investig. Econ. 29, 379–387 (2005)
Lasso de la Vega, C., Urrutia, A.: The extended Atkinson family: the class of multiplicatively decomposable inequality measures, and some new graphical procedures for analysts. J. Econ. Inequal. 6, 211–225 (2008)
Morduch, J., Sicular, T.: Rethinking inequality decomposition, with evidence from rural China. Econ. J. 112, 93–106 (2002)
Olkin, I., Yitzhaki, S.: Gini regression analysis. Int. Stat. Rev. 60, 185–196 (1992)
Paul, S.: Income sources effects on inequality. J. Dev. Econ. 73, 435–451 (2004)
Sala-i-Martin, X.: The world distribution of income: falling poverty and ... convergence, period. Q. J. Econ. 121, 351–397 (2006)
Sastre, M., Trannoy, A.: Changing income inequality in advanced countries: a nested marginalist decomposition analysis. mimeo (2000)
Sastre, M., Trannoy, A.: Shapley inequality decomposition by factor components: some methodological issues. J. Econom. Supplement 9, 51–90 (2002)
Shorrocks, A.F.: The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica 48, 613–625 (1980)
Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica 50(1), 193–211 (1982)
Shorrocks, A.F.: The impact of income components on the distribution of family income. Q. J. Econ. 98, 311–326 (1983)
Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica 52, 1369–1385 (1984)
Shorrocks, A.F.: Aggregation issues in inequality measurement. In: Eichhorn, W. (ed.) Measurement in Economics. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (1988)
Shorrocks, A.F.: Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on the Shapley Value. mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Essex (1999)
Theil, H.: The measurement of inequality by components of income. Econ. Lett. 2, 197–199 (1979)
Yu, L., Luo, R., Zhan, L.: Decomposing income inequality and policy implications in rural China. China World Econ. 15, 44–58 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowell, F.A., Fiorio, C.V. Inequality decompositions—a reconciliation. J Econ Inequal 9, 509–528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9176-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9176-1