Skip to main content
Log in

Inequality decompositions—a reconciliation

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show how classic source-decomposition and subgroup-decomposition methods can be reconciled with regression methodology used in the recent literature. We also highlight some pitfalls that arise from uncritical use of the regression approach. The LIS database is used to compare the approaches using an analysis of the changing contributions to inequality in the United States and Finland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blackorby, C., Donaldson, D., Auersperg, M.: A new procedure for the measurement of inequality within and among population subgroups. Can. J. Econ. 14, 665–685 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blinder, A.S.: Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J. Hum. Resour. 8, 436–455 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bourguignon, F.: Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica 47, 901–920 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H.G., Leite, P.G.: Beyond Oaxaca-Blinder: accounting for differences in household income distributions. J. Econ. Inequal. 6, 117–148 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., Gurgand, M.: Fast development with a stable income distribution: Taiwan, 1979–94. Rev. Income Wealth 47, 139–163 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandolini, A., Smeeding, T.M.: Income inequality in richer and OECD countries. In: Salverda, W., Nolan, N., Smeeding, T.M. (eds.) Oxford Handbook on Economic Inequality, chapter 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brandolini, A., Smeeding, T.M.: Inequality patterns in western-type democracies: cross-country differences and time changes. In: Democracy, I., Representation, P.B., Anderson, R.S.F.C.J. (eds.) Democracy, Inequality and Representation. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chantreuil, F., Trannoy, A.: Inequality decomposition values: the trade-off between marginality and consistency. Working Papers 99-24, THEMA, Université de Cergy-Pontoise (1999)

  9. Charpentier, A., Mussard, S.: Income inequality games. J. Econ. Inequal. (2011, to appear)

  10. Cowell, F.A.: On the structure of additive inequality measures. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, 521–531 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cowell, F.A.: Inequality decomposition—three bad measures. Bull. Econ. Res. 40, 309–312 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cowell, F.A.: Sampling variance and decomposable inequality measures. J. Econom. 42, 27–41 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cowell, F.A., Jenkins, S.P.: How much inequality can we explain? A methodology and an application to the USA. Econ. J. 105, 421–430 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DiNardo, J., Fortin, N.M., Lemieux, T.: Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: a semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64, 1001–1044 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebert, U.: On the decomposition of inequality: Partitions into nonoverlapping sub-groups. In: Eichhorn, W. (ed.) Measurement in Economics. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J.A., Özler, B.: Reinterpreting between-group inequality. J. Econ. Inequal. 6, 231–245 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fields, G.S.: Accounting for income inequality and its change: a new method with application to distribution of earnings in the United States. Res. Labor Econ. 22, 1–38 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fields, G.S., Yoo, G.: Falling labor income inequality in Korea’s economic growth: patterns and underlying causes. Rev. Income Wealth 46, 139–159 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fiorio, C., Jenkins, S.P.: Regression-based inequality decomposition, following Fields (2003). UK Stata User Group meeting, 10 September 2007

  20. Foster, J.E., Shneyerov, A.A.: A general class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econ. Theory 14, 89–111 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Foster, J.E., Shneyerov, A.A.: Path independent inequality measures. J. Econ. Theory 91, 199–222 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gornick, J.C., Smeeding, T.M.: The Luxembourg income study. In: Darity, W.A.J. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 2nd edn., pp. 419–422. Macmillan, Detroit (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jenkins, S.P.: Accounting for inequality trends: Decomposition analyses for the UK. Economica 62, 29–64 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanbur, S.M.N.: The policy significance of decompositions. J. Econ. Inequal. 4, 367–374 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lasso de la Vega, C., Urrutia, A.: Path independent multiplicatively decomposable inequality measures. Investig. Econ. 29, 379–387 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lasso de la Vega, C., Urrutia, A.: The extended Atkinson family: the class of multiplicatively decomposable inequality measures, and some new graphical procedures for analysts. J. Econ. Inequal. 6, 211–225 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morduch, J., Sicular, T.: Rethinking inequality decomposition, with evidence from rural China. Econ. J. 112, 93–106 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Olkin, I., Yitzhaki, S.: Gini regression analysis. Int. Stat. Rev. 60, 185–196 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Paul, S.: Income sources effects on inequality. J. Dev. Econ. 73, 435–451 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sala-i-Martin, X.: The world distribution of income: falling poverty and ... convergence, period. Q. J. Econ. 121, 351–397 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sastre, M., Trannoy, A.: Changing income inequality in advanced countries: a nested marginalist decomposition analysis. mimeo (2000)

  32. Sastre, M., Trannoy, A.: Shapley inequality decomposition by factor components: some methodological issues. J. Econom. Supplement 9, 51–90 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shorrocks, A.F.: The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica 48, 613–625 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica 50(1), 193–211 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shorrocks, A.F.: The impact of income components on the distribution of family income. Q. J. Econ. 98, 311–326 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica 52, 1369–1385 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shorrocks, A.F.: Aggregation issues in inequality measurement. In: Eichhorn, W. (ed.) Measurement in Economics. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shorrocks, A.F.: Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on the Shapley Value. mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Essex (1999)

  39. Theil, H.: The measurement of inequality by components of income. Econ. Lett. 2, 197–199 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu, L., Luo, R., Zhan, L.: Decomposing income inequality and policy implications in rural China. China World Econ. 15, 44–58 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank A. Cowell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowell, F.A., Fiorio, C.V. Inequality decompositions—a reconciliation. J Econ Inequal 9, 509–528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9176-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9176-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation