Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A polarization of inequality? The distribution of national Gini coefficients 1970–1996

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a panel of internationally comparable Gini coefficients, based on the United Nations University/World Institute for Development Economics Research World Income Inequality Database version 1.0. The 217 data points that match minimum requirements of spatial and temporal homogeneity cover 66 developed and developing countries and span a twenty-six year period, from 1970 to 1996. Density functions for the Gini coefficients are estimated for selected points in time in order to offer a concise description of the evolution of inequality in societies across the world. The distribution of inequality appears to be slightly bimodal at the start of the period: alongside a sizable concentration of countries with low to medium levels of Gini inequality, there is a smaller one of very unequal nations, mainly located in Latin America. In the following two decades inequality levels are more homogeneous, suggesting a convergence of class structure across states. In recent times, there has been a resurgence of bimodality; the rise in the number of highly unequal societies has been driven by transition frictions in the ex-USSR area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aghion, P., Caroli, E. and García-Peñalosa, C.: Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of new growth theories, Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1999), 1615–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alesina, A. and Perotti, R.: Income distribution, political instability, and investment, European Economic Review 40 (1996), 1203–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, A. and Brandolini, A.: Promise and pitfalls in the use of 'secondary' data sets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study, Journal of Economic Literature 39 (2001), 771–799.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson, A. and Micklewright, J.: Economic Transformation in Eastern Europe and the Distribution of Income, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banerjee, A. and Duflo, E.: Inequality and growth: What can the data say?, Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2003), 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X.: Convergence, Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992), 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berry, A., Bourguignon, F. and Morrisson, C.: Changes in the world distribution of income between 1950 and 1977, Economic Journal 93 (1983), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertola, G.: Income distribution and macroeconomics, In: A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bourguignon, F. and Morrisson, C.: Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992, American Economic Review 92 (2002), 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deininger, K. and Squire, L.: A new data set measuring income inequality, The World Bank Economic Review 10 (1996), 565–591.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eastwood, R. and Lipton, M.: Rural-urban dimensions of inequality change, UNU/WIDER Working Paper 2003 (2000).

  12. Grosh, M. and Nafziger, E.W.: The computation of world income distribution, Economic Development and Cultural Change 34 (1986), 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heise, D.: Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation, American Sociological Review 34 (1969), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, M.C., Marron, J.S. and Sheather, S.J.: A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (1996), 401–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaldor, N.: Alternative theories of distribution, Review of Economic Studies 23 (1956), 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keefer, P. and Knack, S.: Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth, Public Choice 111 (2002), 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, P.J. and Jennrich, R.I.: Tables of the exact sampling distribution of the two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov criterion, In: H. Harter and D. Owen (eds.), Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics, Markham Publishing Company, Chicago, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kish, L.: Survey Sampling, Wiley, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuznets, S.: Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review 45 (1955), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lehmann, E.L.: Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, H., Squire, L. and Zou, H.: Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality, Economic Journal 108 (1998), 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Londoño, J.L. and Székely, M.: Persistent poverty and excess inequality: Latin America, 1970–1995, Journal of Applied Economics 3 (2000), 93–134.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Milanovic, B.: Explaining the increase in inequality during the transition, World Bank Working Paper 1935 (1998).

  24. Milanovic, B.: Income, Inequality and Poverty during the Transition from Planned to Market Economy, World Bank, Washington, DC, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Milanovic, B.: True income distribution, 1988 and 1993: First calculations based on household surveys alone, Economic Journal 112 (2002), 51–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Milanovic, B.: Worlds apart: Inter-national and world inequality 1950–2000, Mimeo, World Bank, 2002.

  27. Mooney, C. and Duval, D.: Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pagan, A. and Ullah, A.: Nonparametric Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Quah, D.: Empirics for growth and distribution: Polarization, stratification, and convergence clubs, Journal of Economic Growth 2 (1997), 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Quah, D.: One third of the world's growth and inequality, CEPR Discussion Paper 3316 (2002).

  31. Sala-i-Martin, X.: The disturbing 'rise' of global income inequality, NBER Working Paper 8904 (2002).

  32. Schultz, T.P.: Inequality and the distribution of personal income in the world: How it is changing and why, Journal of Population Economics 11 (1998), 307–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheather, S.J. and Jones, M.C.: A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 53 (1991), 683–690.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Silverman, B.W.: Density Estimation, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stephan, F.F. and McCarthy, P.J.: Sampling Opinions, Wiley, New York, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yao, S. and Zhu, L.: Understanding income inequality in China: A multi-angle perspective, Economics of Planning 31 (1998), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Biancotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biancotti, C. A polarization of inequality? The distribution of national Gini coefficients 1970–1996. J Econ Inequal 4, 1–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-4889-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-4889-7

Keywords

Navigation