Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reconciling Kuznets and Habbakuk in a unified growth theory

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic historians have debated the relative labor productivity of the United States agricultural and nonagricultural sectors during the nineteenth century. David (Discussion papers in economic and social history, University of Oxford, 1996) offers a reconciliation of the opposing views by suggesting that while productivity per hour worked in agriculture was comparable to productivity in other sectors, the number of hours worked per year was relatively low, creating a large gap in annual output per worker across sectors. We model and extend a version of Davis’s reconciliation within a unified growth theory that makes connections between the decline in traditional agriculture and several other features of United States development. The dynamic general equilibrium model is consistent with the structural transformation having minor direct and indirect effects on aggregate labor productivity per hour, but substantial effects on aggregate labor productivity per worker. The model also provides a close match to the trends in schooling, fertility, rates of return to physical capital, and labor productivity growth in the nineteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitz M., David P. (1973) Reinterpreting economic growth: Parables and realities. The American Economic Review 63: 428–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitz, M., & David, P. (2001). Two centuries of American macroeconomic growth from exploitation of resource abundance to knowledge-driven development. SIEPR Discussion Paper, No. 01-05.

  • Alston L., Hatton T. (1991) The earnings gap between agricultural and manufacturing laborers, 1925–1941. Journal of Economic History 51: 83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter O., Rouse C. (1998) Income, schooling, and ability: Evidence from a new sample of identical twins. American Economic Review 113: 253–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Atack, J., Bateman, F., & Parker, W. (2000). The farm, the farmer, and the market. In S. Engerman & R. Gallman (Eds.), The Cambridge economic history of the United States Volume 2 (pp. 245–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Au C., Henderson J. (2006) How migration restrictions limit agglomeration production in China. Journal of Development Economics 80: 350–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R.J. (1993) Macroeconomics. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, M. (1953). Farm policies of the United States 1790–1950. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

  • Bertocchi G. (2006) The law of primogeniture and the transition from landed aristocracy to industrial democracy. Journal of Economic Growth 11: 43–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bils M., Klenow P. (2000) Does schooling cause growth? American Economic Review 90: 1160–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadberry S.N., Irwin D.A. (2006) Labor productivity in the United States and the United Kingdom during the nineteenth century. Explorations in Economic History 43: 257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., Ransom, R., & Sutch, R. (2004). Family matters: The life-cycle transition and the unparalleled fertility decline in Antebellum America. In T. Guinnane, W. Sundstrom, & W. Whately (Eds.), History matters: Essays on economic growth, technology, and demographic change (pp. 271–327). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Caselli F., Coleman W. (2001) The US structural transformation and regional convergence: A reinterpretation. Journal of Political Economy 109: 584–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier P., Radwan S., Wangwe S. (1986) Labour and poverty in rural Tanzania: Ujameen and rural development in the United Republic of Tanzania. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba, J., & Ripoll, M. (2006a). Agriculture and aggregation. Mimeo; (2006b). Wage gaps and cross-country income differences. Mimeo.

  • Cunningham, H. (1990). The employment and unemployment of children in England c. 1680–1851. Past and Present, 126, 115–150.

  • David P. (1967) The growth of real product in the United States before 1840: New evidence, controlled conjectures. Journal of Economic History 29: 151–197

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. (1996). Real income and economic welfare growth in the early republic. Discussion papers in economic and social history, 5, March. University of Oxford.

  • Doepke M. (2004) Accounting for the fertility decline during the transition to growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9(3): 347–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen A., Eckstein Z. (1988) On the organization of rural markets and the process of development. American Economic Review 78: 431–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo E. (2001) Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment. American Economic Review 91: 795–813

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton J. (1987) A dynamic specific factors model of international trade. Review of Economic Studies 54: 325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely R., Wehrwein G. (1940) Land economics. Macmillan Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson R., Washer W. (2004) Distinguished lecturers on economics in government: Lessons from past productivity booms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster A., Rosenzweig M. (1996) Technical change and human capital returns and investments: Evidence from the green revolution. American Economic Review 86: 931–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallman, R. (1992). American economic growth before the civil war: The testimony of capital stock estimates. In R. Gallman & J. Wallis (Eds.), American economic growth and standards of living before the civil war, Chap. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Galor, O. (2005). From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North Holland.

  • Galor O., Moav O., Vollrath D. (2009) Inequality in land ownership, the emergence of human capital promoting institutions, and the great divergence. Review of Economic Studies 76: 143–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O., (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. American Economic Review 86: 374–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor O., Weil D. (2000) Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90: 806–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner B. (2002) American agriculture in the twentieth century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (1999). The returns to skill in the United States across the twentieth century. NBER Working Paper #7126.

  • Goldin, C., Katz, L. (2000). Education and income in the early 20th century: Evidence from the praires. Journal of Economic History, 782–818.

  • Goldin C., Sokoloff K. (1984) The relative productivity hypothesis of industrialization: The American case 1820 to 1850. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 461–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollin D., Parente S., Rogerson R. (2004) Farmwork, homework, and international income differences. Review of Economic Dynamics 74: 827–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. (1999). U.S. economic growth since 1870: One big wave? American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 89, 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood J., Seshadri A. (2002) The US demographic transition. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 92: 153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbakuk J. (1962) American and British technology in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, M. (2000). The population of the United States 1790–1920. In S. Engerman & R. Gallman (Eds.), The Cambridge economic history of the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hall R., Jones C. (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 83–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen G., Prescott E. (2002) Malthus to solow. American Economic Review 92: 1205–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J., Todaro M. (1970) Migration, unemployment, and development: A two-sector analysis. American Economic Review 66: 126–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton T., Williamson J. (1991) Integrated and segmented labor markets: Thinking in two sectors. Journal of Economic History 51: 413–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, T., & Williamson, J. (1992). What explains wages between the farm and city? Exploring the todaro model with American evidence, 1890–1941. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40, 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F., & Prescott, E. (2006). The depressing effect of agricultural institutions on the pre-war Japanese economy. NBER Working Paper #12081.

  • Hazan M., Berdugo B. (2002) Child labor, fertility, and economic growth. Economic Journal 112: 810–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrell S., Humphries J. (1995) The exploitation of little children: Child labor and the family in the industrial revolution. Explorations in Economic History 32: 485–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, & Lau, L. (1982). Farmer education and farm efficiency. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Jenkins C., Knight J. (2002) The economic decline of Zimbabwe. Palgrave Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick J. (1961) Productivity trends in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick J. (1973) Postwar productivity trends in the United States 1948–1969. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S. (1965) Modern economic growth: Rate structure, and spread. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebergott S. (1964) Manpower in economic growth: The American record since 1800. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A. (1954) Development with unlimited supplies of labor. The Manchester School 22: 139–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord W., Rangazas P. (2006) Fertility and development: The roles of schooling and family production. Journal of Economic Growth 11: 229–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R.E.B. (1985) Migration amongst the Batswana. Economic Journal 95: 358–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margo R. (2000) Wages and labor markets in the United States 1820–1860. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Margo, R. (2000b). The labor force in the 19th century. In S. Engerman & R. Gallman (Eds.), The Cambridge economic history of the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Moav O. (2005) Cheap children and the persistence of poverty. Economic Journal 115: 88–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourmouras A., Rangazas P. (2007) Foreign aid policy and sources of poverty: A quantitative framework. IMF Staff Papers 54: 59–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourmouras, A., & Rangazas, P. (2007b). Wage gaps and development: Lessons from U.S. history. IMF Working Paper 105.

  • Mundlak Y. (2005) Economic growth: Lessons from two centuries of American agriculture. Journal of Economic Literature 43: 989–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K., Welch F. (1993) Occupational choice and the demand for skill, 1940–1990. American Economic Review 83: 122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld M., Taylor A. (2004) Global capital markets: Integration, crisis, and growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack M. (1969) Farm fencing in the nineteenth century. Journal of Economic History 29: 287–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos G. (1985) Returns to education: A further international update and implications. Journal of Human Resources 20: 583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangazas P. (2002) The quantity an quality of schooling and U.S. labor productivity growth (1870–2000). Review of Economic Dynamics 5: 932–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranis G., Fei J. (1961) A theory of economic development. American Economic Review 51(4): 533–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Restuccia, D., Yang, D., & Zhu, X. (2004). Agriculture and aggregate productivity: A quantitative cross-country analysis. Mimeo.

  • Saloutos T. (1962) Land policy and its relation to agricultural production and distribution, 1862 to 1933. Journal of Economic History 22: 445–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz T. (1964) Transforming traditional agriculture. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicsic P. (1992) City-farm wage gaps in the late nineteenth century france. Journal of Economic History 52: 675–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbrouke G. (2008) The U.S. westward expansion. International Economic Review 49(1): 81–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbrouke G. (2008) The American frontier: Technology versus immigration. Review of Economic Dynamics 11(2): 283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J. (2000). American government finance in the long-run: 1790 to 1990. Journal of Economic Perspectives.

  • Weiss, T. (1992). U.S. labor force estimates and economic growth 1800–1860. In P. E. Gallman & J. J. Wallis (Eds.), American economic growth and the standard of living before the civil war. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER.

  • Weiss T. (1993) Long term changes in U.S. agricultural output per worker, 1800 to 1900. Economic History Review 46(2): 324–341

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, USA

    Alex Mourmouras

  2. IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Peter Rangazas

Authors
  1. Alex Mourmouras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Rangazas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mourmouras, A., Rangazas, P. Reconciling Kuznets and Habbakuk in a unified growth theory. J Econ Growth 14, 149–181 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-009-9041-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-009-9041-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation