Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Has Contrasting Effects on Prey Capture by Two Co-Occurring Wolf Spider Species

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropogenic substances have the potential to affect animal behavior either because they present a novel stimulus or because they interfere with natural chemical communication pathways. Such shifts can alter the dynamic between predators and potential prey, which might affect population success as well as the strength of food web linkages. We examined the foraging of two wolf spiders, Tigrosa helluo and Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae), that are abundant in agroecosystems where they are routinely exposed to herbicides. We tested the hypothesis that the presence of a commercial formulation of a glyphosate-based herbicide would affect the prey capture behavior of these two wolf spiders. We tested the larger Tigrosa foraging on Pardosa or crickets (Acheta domesticus) and the smaller Pardosa foraging on crickets. Tigrosa subdued crickets more quickly and with fewer lunges than it took them to capture Pardosa. The presence of herbicide allowed Tigrosa to orient toward and capture both prey species more quickly but it did not affect the number of lunges required to subdue either prey. Herbicide did not affect the timing of prey capture for Pardosa but it did cause them to use more lunges in the process. Thus, herbicide had contrasting effects on foraging behavior of these two agrobiont predators, which means that it could shift the direction and strength of food web linkages in complex ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apfelbach R, Blanchard CD, Blanchard RJ, Hayes RA, McGregor IS (2005) The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1123–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aquiloni L, Massolo A, Gherardi F (2009) Sex identification in female crayfish is bimodal. Naturwissenshaften 96:103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (2002) A spider’s world: Senses and behavior. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis A (2000) Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects. Pest Manag Sci 56:299–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell JR, Haughton AJ, Boatman ND, Wilcox A (2002) Do incremental increases of the herbicide glyphosate have indirect consequences for spider communities? J Arachnol 30:288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady AR (2012) Nearctic species of the new genus Tigrosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). J Arachnol 40:182–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burks RI, Lodge DM (2002) Cued in: advances and opportunities in freshwater chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol 28:1901–1917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dall SRX, Schmidt KA, van Gils JA (2010) Biological information in an ecological context. Oikos 119:201–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desneux N, Decourtye A, J-M D (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 52:81–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dicke M, Takken W (2006) Chemical ecology: From gene to ecosystem. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans SC, Shaw EM, Rypstra AL (2010) Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicide affects agribiont predatory arthropod behaviour and long-term survival. Ecotoxicology 19:1249–1257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giesy JP, Dobson S, Solomon KR (2000) Ecotoxicological risk assessment for Roundup® herbicide. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 8:269–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesinger LM, Evans SC, Rypstra AL (2011) Effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide on mate location in a wolf spider that inhabits agroecosystems. Chemosphere 84:1461–1463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez MF, Paggi JC, Gagneten AM (2012) Infodisruptions in predator–prey interactions: xenobiotics alter microcrustaceans responses to fish infochemicals. Exotoxicol Environ Safety 81:11–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton AJ, Bell JR, Boatman ND, Wilcox A (1999) The effects of different rates of the herbicide glyphosate on spiders in arable field margins. J Arachnol 27:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton AJ, Bell JR, Boatman ND, Wilcox A (2001) The effect of the herbicide glyphosate on non-target spiders: Part II. Indirect effects on Lepthyphantes tenuis in field margins. Pest Manag Sci 57:1037–1042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton AJ, Champion GT, Hawes C et al (2003) Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods. Philos Trans Roy Soci London B 358:1863–1877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefler CD, Taylor M, Jakob EM (2002) Chemosensory responde to prey in Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae) and Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol 30:155–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefler CD, Durso LC, McIntyre KD (2012) Chemical-mediated predator avoidance in the European house cricket (Acheta domesticus) is modulated by predator diet. Ethology 118:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe CM, Berrill M, Pauli BD, Helbing CC, Werry K, Veldhoen N (2004) Toxicity of glyphosate-based pesticides to four north American frog species. Environ. Toxicol Chem 23:1928–1938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klaschka U (2008) The infochemical effect—a new chapter in ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15:452–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komeza N, Fouillet P, Bouletreau M, Delpuech JM (2001) Modification by the insecticide chlopyrifos, of the behavioural response to kairomones of the parasitoid wasp, Leptopilina boulardi. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 31:232–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane JE, Forrest MNK, Willis CKR (2011) Anthropogenic influences on natural animal mating systems. An Behavi 81:909–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren JG, Gassman AJ, Bernal J, Duan JJ, Ruberson J (2009) Ecological compatability of GM crops and biological control. Crop Protect 28:1017–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lürling M, Scheffer M (2007) Info-disruption: pollution and the transfer of chemical information between organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 22:374–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall SD, Walker SE, Rypstra AL (2000) A test for differential colonization and competitive ability in two generalist predators. Ecology 81:3341–3349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall SD, Walker SE, Rypstra AL (2006) Two ecologically-divergent generalist predators have different responses to landscape fragmentation. Oikos 114:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall SD, Pavuk DM, Rypstra AL (2002) A comparative study of phenology and daily activity patterns in the wolf spiders Pardosa milvina and Hogna helluo in soybean agroecosystems in southwestern Ohio (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol 30:503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers WB (1996) Human impact on the earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash L (2008) Purity and danger: historical reflections on the regulation of environmental pollutants. Environ Hist 13:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan IW (1996) Glyphosate fact sheet. Pesticide News 33:28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Partan S, Marler P (1999) Behavior—Communication goes multimodal Science 283:1272–1273

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S (2012) Spiders (Araneae) in the pesticide world: an ecotoxicological review. Pest Manag Sci 68:1438–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Uetz GW (1997) The effect of prey movement on attack behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Ins Behav 10:737–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH (1999) Hunger effects on foraging responses to perceptual cues in immature and adult wolf spiders. An Behav 57:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Rypstra AL (2000) Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider, Hogna helluo (Araneae, Lycosidae). Ethology 106:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Rypstra AL (2001) Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. J Chem Ecol 27:2493–2504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Walker SE, Rypstra AL, Marshall SD (2001) Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae; Lycosidae). An Behav 61:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (2002) Agricultural chemicals and the environment. In: Lal R, Hansen DO, Uphoff N, Slack S (eds) Food security and environmental quality in the developing world. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2005) The lethal impacts of Roundup and predatory stress on six species of North American tadpoles. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:351–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA, Hoverman JT (2006) Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: a review and synthesis in freshwater systems. Ecol Lett 9:1157–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohr JR, Kerby JL, Sih A (2006) Community ecology as a framework for predicting contaminant effects. Trends Ecol Evo 21:606–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovner JS (1991) Evidence for idiothetically controlled turns and extraocular photoreception in lycosid spiders. J Arachnol 19:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovner JS (1993) Visually mediated responses in the lycosid spider Rabidosa rabida: the roles of different pairs of eyes. Mem Queensland Mus 33:53–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Bohan DA, Haughton AJ et al (2003) Invertebrates and vegetation of field margins adjacent to crops subject to contrasting herbicide regimes in the farm scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans Roy Soc B 358:1879–1898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rypstra AL, Samu F (2005) Size dependent intraguild predation in coexisting wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). J Arachnol 33:390–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KA, Dall SRX, van Gils JA (2010) The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions. Oikos 119:304–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ (2007) Predator diversity and trophic interactions. Ecology 88:2415–2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider MI, Sanchez N, Pinada S, Chi H, Ronco A (2009) Impact of glyphosate on the development, fertility and demography of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): ecological approach. Chemosphere 76:1451–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Stamps J, Yang LH, McElreath R, Ramenofsky M (2010) Behavior as a key component of integrative biology in a human-altered world. Integ Comp Biol 50:934–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Ferrari MCO, Harris DJ (2011) Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change. Evolut Appl 4:367–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomainen U, Candolin U (2011) Behavioral responses to human-induced environmental change. Biol Rev 86:640–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Chislock MF (2010) Blinded by the stink: nutrient enrichment impairs the perception of predation risk by freshwater snails. Ecol Appl 20:2089–2095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker SE, Rypstra AL (2002) Sexual dimorphism in trophic morphology and feeding behavior of wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) result from differences in reproductive roles. Canad J Zool 80:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH (2006) Cannibalism, food limitation, Intraspecific competition and the regulation of spider populations. Annu Rev Entomol 51:441–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn AT (2000) Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwide. Pest Manag Sci 56:309–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wrinn KM, Evans SC, Rypstra AL (2012) Predator cues and an herbicide affect activity and emigration of an agribiont wolf spider. Chemosphere 87:390–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the use of the Ecology Research Center where spiders were collected. Experiments were funded by Miami University’s DUOS (Doctoral Undergraduate Opportunity for Scholarship) grant to SR and KMW, a Dean’s Scholarship Award to SR, the Department of Zoology and the Hamilton Campus. Alex Webb’s participation was supported by a National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates site grant (1156703). We are indebted to participants in the Miami University spider lab between 2008 and 2013 for advice, assistance in the laboratory and field and editorial suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann L. Rypstra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rittman, S., Wrinn, K.M., Evans, S.C. et al. Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Has Contrasting Effects on Prey Capture by Two Co-Occurring Wolf Spider Species. J Chem Ecol 39, 1247–1253 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0353-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0353-5

Keywords

Navigation