Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Expertise: A Preliminary Attempt to Clarify Its Core Elements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent emphasis on evidence-based practice revolves around an integration of three domains: client characteristics, relevant research, and clinical expertise. Unfortunately, most reports focus on the examination of current research, while few guidelines exist for clarifying or developing expertise in clinical psychology. Although expertise is more advanced than competence, basic clinical competence can set the foundation for the development of more sophisticated skills. It is best to strive for narrow domains of expertise instead of global ratings of a professional as an “expert”. Five criteria are proposed for evaluating, developing, and maintaining clinical expertise: (1) the professional must possess a terminal degree in the field, (2) the professional has accumulated multiple years of clinical experience in the direct provision of clinical assessment, psychological testing, or psychological treatment, (3) the professional has attained advanced credentials in a specific area of psychology, (4) the professional is visible in the professional community at a national level, and (5) the professional has demonstrated evidence of superior clinical skills in a specific application of psychology. Together, these five criteria help to objectify the evaluation and cultivation of clinical expertise in psychology. Because each criterion is weak and flawed if used alone, it is recommended that multiple criteria are used in combination to define clinical expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S., Sanislow, C., Zuroff, D., & Pilkonis, P. (1996). Characteristics of effective therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1276–1284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, R. (1997). Case conceptualization strategies: The relationship between psychologists’ experience levels, academic training, and mode of clinical inquiry. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G., & Barlow, S. (1996). Outcome and process differences between professional and nonprofessional therapists in time-limited group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 46(4), 455–478.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, S. (1972). Obsolescence or lifelong education: A choice for the professional. American Psychologist, 27, 486–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, F. (1991). Expertise in psychotherapy: Inherent liabilities of becoming experienced. Psychotherapy, 28(3), 422–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T., & Lambert, K. (2003). Case formulation and treatment concepts among novice, experienced, and expert cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic therapists. Psychotherapy Research, 13(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T., Lambert, K., Kendjelic, E., Turner, L., & Lucas, C. (2005). The quality of psychotherapy case formulations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 579–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241(4861), 31–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, A. J., Simon, N., & Nezu, C. (2006). The future of clinical psychology: Board certification. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13, 254–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., & Matarazzo, J. (1988). Psychologists and psychiatrists as expert witnesses. Science, 241(4870), 1143–1144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foxhall, K. (2000). What’s behind that credential: When it comes to credentialing, caveat emptor. Monitor on Psychology, 31(8), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glidewell, J., & Livert, D. (1992). Confidence in the practice of clinical psychology. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 23(5), 362–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M., Raue, P., & Castonguay, L. (1998). The therapist focus in significant sessions of master therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 803–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Schwartz, B., & Schwartz, J. (1978). Psychotherapy process variables distinguishing the “inherently helpful” person from the professional psychotherapist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 196–197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, R. (1997). Psychological expertise and the role of individual differences. Educational Psychology Review, 9(3), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosch, E. (2006). Does specialty board certification influence clinical outcomes? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(5), 473–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillerbrand, E. (1989). Cognitive differences between experts and novices: Implications for group supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillerbrand, E., & Claiborn, C. (1990). Examining reasoning skill differences between expert and novice counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 68(July/August), 684–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamhi, A. (1995). Defining, developing, and maintaining clinical expertise. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 26(4), 353–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassirer, J., Kuipers, B., & Gorry, G. (1982). Toward a theory of clinical expertise. American Journal of Medicine, 73, 251–259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T., & Vandenbos, G. (1986). Beyond clinical trials: Generalizing from research to practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17(5), 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, S., Martinovich, Z., Lutz, W., & Lyons, J. (2005). The effect of therapist experience on psychotherapy outcomes. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M., Comtois, K., Murray, A., Brown, M., Gallop, R., Heard, H., et al. (2006). Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 757–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, T., & Covell, A. (1997). Characterizing expert psychologist behavior: Implications from selected expertise literature. Educational Psychology Review, 9(3), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Slemon, A., Hiebert, B., Hallberg, E., & Cummings, A. (1989). Conceptualizations of novice and experienced counselors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(4), 395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, S., & Marsh, J. (2008). Practitioner expertise in evidence-based practice decision-making. Research on Social Work, 18(4), 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (1978). Law and mental health professionals: The limits of expertise. Professional Psychology, 9, 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozdzierz, G., Peluso, P., & Lisiecki, J. (2009). Principles of counseling and psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J., Hogan, T., & Koocher, G. (2008). Evidence-based practice in psychology. The Register Report, 34(fall), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, K., Clark, R., & Malakuti, R. (1997). Expert and novice performance: Implications for clinical training. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, K., & Goodyear, R. (1997). Client assessment by novice and expert psychologists: A comparison of strategies. Educational Psychology Review, 9(3), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. (1995). Elements of the socratic method: IV: Disavowal of knowledge. Psychotherapy, 32(2), 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (2007a). The central role of the therapeutic alliance: A simulated interview with Carl Rogers. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37(2), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (2007b). The Boulder model in academia: Striving to integrate the science and practice of psychology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37(4), 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (2008). Advancing the field of psychotherapy through innovation and integration in scholarly works. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 38(2), 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C., & Fine, M. (1990). Defining the boundaries of professional competence: Managing subtle cases of clinical incompetence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(6), 462–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, B., Nudler, S., Vonkorff, M., & McGhee, J. (1974). The experiences professional interviewer versus the complete novice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(5), 680–690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rassafiani, M., Ziviani, J., Rodger, S., & Dalgleish, L. (2008). Identification of occupational therapy clinical expertise: Decision-making characteristics. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikers, R., & Verkoeijen, P. (2007). Clinical expertise research: A history lesson from those who wrote it. Medical Education, 41, 1115–1116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H., Norman, G., & Boshuizen, H. (1990). A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implications. Academic Medicine, 65(10), 611–621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psychologica, 68, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. (1992a). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 252–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. (1992b). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychologica, 81, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., Weiss, D., Thomas, R., & Pounds, J. (2002). Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not. European Journal of Occupational Research, 136(2), 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., Weiss, D., Thomas, R., & Pounds, J. (2003). How can you tell if someone is an expert? Empirical assessment of expertise. In S. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on decision research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L., Bashook, P., Lipsky, M., Horowitz, S., & Miller, S. (2002). Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes. Academic Medicine, 77(6), 534–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shook, G. (2005). An examination of the integrity and future of the behavior analyst certification board credentials. Behavior Modification, 29(3), 562–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skovholt, T., & Jennings, L. (2004). Master therapists: Exploring expertise in therapy and counseling. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovholt, T., Ronnestad, M., & Jennings, L. (1997). Searching for expertise in counseling, psychotherapy, and professional psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Goodwin, D., Mort, M., & Pope, C. (2003). Expertise in practice: An ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anesthesia. British Journal of Anesthesia, 91(3), 319–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H., & Hadley, S. (1979). Specific versus nonspecific factors in psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36(10), 1125–1136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. (1999). Evidence and expertise: The challenge of the outcomes movement to medical professionalism. Academic Medicine, 74(7), 757–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakoch, D., & Strupp, H. (2000). The evolution of psychotherapy training: Reflections on manual-based learning and future alternatives. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 309–318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D., & Shanteau, J. (2003). Empirical assessment of expertise. Human Factors, 45, 104–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author thanks Jim Yokley and Julia DiFilippo for thoughtful comments made on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7123, USA

    James C. Overholser

Authors
  1. James C. Overholser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James C. Overholser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Overholser, J.C. Clinical Expertise: A Preliminary Attempt to Clarify Its Core Elements. J Contemp Psychother 40, 131–139 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-009-9129-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-009-9129-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation