Skip to main content
Log in

Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We introduce a hierarchy of problems between the Dominating Set problem and the Power Dominating Set (PDS) problem called the -round power dominating set (-round PDS, for short) problem. For =1, this is the Dominating Set problem, and for n−1, this is the PDS problem; here n denotes the number of nodes in the input graph. In PDS the goal is to find a minimum size set of nodes S that power dominates all the nodes, where a node v is power dominated if (1) v is in S or it has a neighbor in S, or (2) v has a neighbor u such that u and all of its neighbors except v are power dominated. Note that rule (1) is the same as for the Dominating Set problem, and that rule (2) is a type of propagation rule that applies iteratively. The -round PDS problem has the same set of rules as PDS, except we apply rule (2) in “parallel” in at most −1 rounds. We prove that -round PDS cannot be approximated better than \(2^{\log^{1-\epsilon}{n}}\) even for =4 in general graphs. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm to solve -round PDS optimally in polynomial time on graphs of bounded tree-width. We present a PTAS (polynomial time approximation scheme) for -round PDS on planar graphs for \(\ell=O(\frac{\log{n}}{\log{\log{n}}})\) . Finally, we give integer programming formulations for -round PDS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aazami A (2008) Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results. Manuscript (available on arXiv:0802.2130v1)

  • Aazami A, Stilp MD (2006) Approximation algorithms and hardness for domination with propagation. 22 pages, Submitted to a journal (avaiable on arXiv:0710.2139v1)

  • Aazami A, Stilp MD (2007) Approximation algorithms and hardness for domination with propagation. In: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on approximation algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. LNCS, vol 4627. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Alber J, Bodlaender HL, Fernau H, Kloks T, Niedermeier R (2002) Fixed parameter algorithms for dominating set and related problems on planar graphs. Algorithmica 33(4):461–493

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baker BS (1994) Approximation algorithms for NP-complete problems on planar graphs. J ACM 41(1):153–180

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin TL, Mili L, Boisen MB, Adapa R (1993) Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(2):707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava B (1999) Synchronized phasor measurement system project at Southern California Edison Co. Power Eng Soc Summer Meet 1999 IEEE 1:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodlaender HL (1988) Some classes of graphs with bounded treewidth. Bull EATCS 36:116–126

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brueni DJ (1993) Minimal PMU placement for graph observability, a decomposition approach. MS thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA

  • Brueni DJ, Heath LS (2005) The PMU placement problem. SIAM J Discrete Math 19(3):744–761

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Demaine ED, Hajiaghayi MT (2005) Bidimensionality: new connections between FPT algorithms and PTASs. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, pp 590–601

  • Diestel R (2000) Graph theory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfling M, Henning MA (2006) A note on power domination in grid graphs. Discrete Appl Math 154(6):1023–1027

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Feige U (1998) A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. J ACM 45(4):634–652

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Niedermeier R, Raible D (2005) Improved algorithms and complexity results for power domination in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on fundamentals of computation theory. LNCS, vol 3623. Springer, Berlin, pp 172–184 (To appear in Algorithmica)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998a) Domination in graphs: advanced topics. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998b) Fundamentals of domination in graphs. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi SM, Hedetniemi ST, Henning MA (2002) Domination in graphs applied to electric power networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 15(4):519–529

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DS (1974) Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. J Comput Syst Sci 9(3):256–278

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kloks T (1994) Treewidth, computations and approximations. LNCS, vol 842. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneis J, Mölle D, Richter S, Rossmanith P (2006) Parameterized power domination complexity. Inf Process Lett 98(4):145–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kortsarz G (2001) On the hardness of approximating spanners. Algorithmica 30(3):432–450

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liao CS, Lee DT (2005) Power domination problem in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 11th international computing and combinatorics conference. LNCS, vol 3595. Springer, Berlin, pp 818–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund C, Yannakakis M (1994) On the hardness of approximating minimization problems. J ACM 41(5):960–981

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Martin KE (2002) Phasor measurements at the Bonneville power administration. Power systems and communications infrastructures for the future

  • Mili L, Baldwin TL, Phadke AG (1991) Phasor measurements for voltage and transient stability monitoring and control. In: Proceedings of the EPRI-NSF workshop on application of advanced mathematics to power systems

  • Nuqui RF (2001) State estimation and voltage security monitoring using synchronized phasor measurements, PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, July 2001

  • Phadke AG (2002) Synchronized phasor measurements—a historical overview. Transm Distrib Conf Exhib 1:476–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz R, Safra S (1997) A sub-constant error-probability low-degree test, and a sub-constant error-probability PCP characterization of NP. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, pp 475–484

  • Zhao M, Kang L, Chang GJ (2006) Power domination in graphs. Discrete Math. 306(15):1812–1816

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashkan Aazami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aazami, A. Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results. J Comb Optim 19, 429–456 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-008-9176-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-008-9176-7

Keywords

Navigation