Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting unconsciousness after propofol administration: qCON, BIS, and ALPHA band frequency power

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During anesthesia induction with propofol the level of arousal progressively decreases until reaching loss of consciousness (LOC). In addition, there is a shift of alpha activity from parieto-occipital to frontal zones, defined as anteriorization. Whilst monitoring LOC and anteriorization would be useful to improve propofol dosage and patient safety, the current devices for anesthetic depth monitoring are unable to detect these events. The aim of this study was to observe LOC and anteriorization during anesthesia induction with propofol by applying electrodes placed in the frontal and parietal areas. Bispectral index (BIS) and quantium consciousness index (qCON) monitors were simultaneously employed. BIS™ and qCON sensors were placed in the frontal and parieto-occipital regions of 10 alopecic patients who underwent anesthesia with propofol, alfentanil, and remifentanil. The initial biophase target of propofol was 2.5 mcg/mL which was gradually increased until reaching LOC. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to study differences in alpha power and qCON/BIS indices along the study; and Pk value to evaluate predictive capability of anteriorization of BIS, qCON, and alpha waves. Parietal BIS and qCON values became significantly higher than frontal values 15 min after loss of eye reflex. Anteriorization was observed with both monitors. Pk values for BIS and qCON were strongly predictive of frontal alpha absolute power. During anesthesia induction with propofol it is possible to identify anteriorization with BIS and qCON in the frontal and parieto-occipital regions. Both indices showed different patterns which need to be further studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hudetz AG. General anesthesia and human brain connectivity. Brain Connect. 2012;2:291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkire MT, Hudetz AG, Tononi G. Consciousness and anesthesia. Science. 2008;322:876–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mashour GA. Anesthetizing the self: the neurobiology of humbug. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:747–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ku SW, Lee U, Noh GJ, et al. Preferential inhibition of frontal-to-parietal feedback connectivity is a neurophysiologic correlate of general anesthesia in surgical patients. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aldana EM, Valverde JL, Fabregas N. Consciousness, cognition and brain networks: new perspectives. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2016;63:459–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ni Mhuircheartaigh R, Warnaby C, Rogers R, et al. Slow-wave activity saturation and thalamocortical isolation during propofol anesthesia in humans. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:208ra148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Purdon PL, Pierce ET, Mukamel EA, et al. Electroencephalogram signatures of loss and recovery of consciousness from propofol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E1142–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tinker JH, Sharbrough FW, Michenfelder JD. Anterior shift of the dominant EEG rhytham during anesthesia in the Java monkey: correlation with anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology. 1977;46:252–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bosch L, Fernandez-Candil J, Leon A, et al. Influence of general anaesthesia on the brainstem. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017;64:157–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Russell IF, Wang M. The IFT (isolated forearm technique) and consciousness. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:532.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider G, Jordan D, Schwarz G, et al. Monitoring depth of anesthesia utilizing a combination of electroencephalographic and standard measures. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:819–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Escallier KE, Nadelson MR, Zhou D, et al. Monitoring the brain: processed electroencephalogram and peri-operative outcomes. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:899–910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruhn J, Bouillon TW, Radulescu L, et al. Correlation of approximate entropy, bispectral index, and spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) with clinical signs of "anesthetic depth" during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:621–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen EW, Valencia JF, Lopez A, et al. Monitoring hypnotic effect and nociception with two EEG-derived indices, qCON and qNOX, during general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:933–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:980–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, et al. Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1757–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, et al. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindholm ML, Traff S, Granath F, et al. Mortality within 2 years after surgery in relation to low intraoperative bispectral index values and preexisting malignant disease. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:508–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zetterlund EL, Green H, Oscarsson A, et al. Determination of loss of consciousness: a comparison of clinical assessment, bispectral index and electroencephalogram: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:922–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scheinin A, Kallionpaa RE, Li D, et al. Differentiating drug-related and state-related effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:22–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Metzner J, Domino KB. Risks of anesthesia or sedation outside the operating room: the role of the anesthesia care provider. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:523–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Youn AM, Ko YK, Kim YH. Anesthesia and sedation outside of the operating room. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68:323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baranov D, Bickler PE, Crosby GJ, et al. Consensus statement: first international workshop on anesthetics and Alzheimer's disease. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1627–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gambus PL, Troconiz IF, Feng X, et al. Relation between acute and long-term cognitive decline after surgery: influence of metabolic syndrome. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;50:203–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sessler DI, Sigl JC, Kelley SD, et al. Hospital stay and mortality are increased in patients having a "triple low" of low blood pressure, low bispectral index, and low minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gambus PL, Jensen EW, Jospin M, et al. Modeling the effect of propofol and remifentanil combinations for sedation-analgesia in endoscopic procedures using an Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). Anesth Analg. 2011;112:331–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gambus PL, Troconiz IF. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in anaesthesia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79:72–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gambus PL, Stanski DR. Lessons learned in drug development from anesthesia. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2005;52:311–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dahaba AA, Xue JX, Zhao GG, et al. BIS-vista occipital montage in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:645–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pandin P, Van Cutsem N, Tuna T, et al. Bispectral index is a topographically dependent variable in patients receiving propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:676–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shiraishi T, Uchino H, Sagara T, et al. A comparison of frontal and occipital bispectral index values obtained during neurosurgical procedures. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1773–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lehmann A, Schmidt M, Zeitler C, et al. Bispectral index and electroencephalographic entropy in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24:751–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brown EN, Purdon PL, Van Dort CJ. General anesthesia and altered states of arousal: a systems neuroscience analysis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:601–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sepulveda PO, Tapia LF, Monsalves S. Neural inertia and differences between loss of and recovery from consciousness during total intravenous anaesthesia: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:801–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Purdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, et al. Clinical electroencephalography for anesthesiologists: part I: background and basic signatures. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:937–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Maciel CB, Youn TS, Barden MM, et al. Corneal reflex testing in the evaluation of a comatose patient: an ode to precise semiology and examination skills. Neurocrit Care. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00896-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the collaboration of the surgeons Marcel Segura and Jaime Jimeno for their help in selecting the cases. We also want to thank Stephanie Lonsdale for her help in translating the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan L. Fernández-Candil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the Ethics Committee of Hospital del Mar (2013/5173/I) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-Candil, J.L., Terradas, S.P., Barriuso, E.V. et al. Predicting unconsciousness after propofol administration: qCON, BIS, and ALPHA band frequency power. J Clin Monit Comput 35, 723–729 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00528-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00528-5

Keywords

Navigation