Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Individualized assessment of post-arthroplasty recovery by actigraphy: a methodology study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies using actigraphy to monitor recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have reported activity as maximum and average count/min, but not utilized the full potential of the data by stratifying activity into various intensities or analysed the individual development in activity over time. The aim of this study was to describe a novel methodology using actigraphy data to describe specific activity-intensities potentially affected by surgery and patients with poor rehabilitation trajectories. Actigraphy data from 10 patients scheduled for primary unilateral TKA were recorded preoperatively and for 3 weeks postoperatively. Data were individualized by comparing pre- and post-operative values, and activity intensities stratified by division into 5 percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th). Changes in activity were assessed visually and by non-parametric testing. Individualized recovery trajectories were described by the gradient of the regression line of post- versus pre-operative physical activity over the study period. TKA had a negative impact on all activity intensities with gradual improvement towards preoperative values during the study period. The inter-individual variation increased with intensified activity. Identification of individual patients with positive, neutral or negative activity trajectories was possible. The methodology should be considered in future interventional studies to improve rehabilitation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aasvang EK, Luna IE, Kehlet H. Challenges in postdischarge function and recovery: the case of fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:861–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Battistelli S, Fortina M, Carta S, Guerranti R, Nobile F, Ferrata P. Serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin kinetics in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:565080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Browne JP, Bastaki H, Dawson J. What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. de Groot IB, Bussmann HJ, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA. Small increase of actual physical activity 6 months after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2201–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Farr JN, Going SB, Lohman TG, Rankin L, Kasle S, Cornett M, Cussler E. Physical activity levels in patients with early knee osteoarthritis measured by accelerometry. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1229–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Grosu I, Lavand’homme P, Thienpont E. Pain after knee arthroplasty: an unresolved issue. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:1744–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harding P, Holland AE, Delany C, Hinman RS. Do activity levels increase after total hip and knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1502–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harding PA, Holland AE, Hinman RS, Delany C. Physical activity perceptions and beliefs following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hossain FS, Konan S, Patel S, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Haddad FS. The assessment of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: are we there yet? Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jans O, Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Solgaard S, Johansson PI, Kehlet H. Orthostatic intolerance during early mobilization after fast-track hip arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:436–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jans O, Jorgensen C, Kehlet H, Johansson PI. Role of preoperative anemia for risk of transfusion and postoperative morbidity in fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Transfusion. 2014;54:717–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krenk L, Jennum P, Kehlet H. Activity, sleep and cognition after fast-track hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1265–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwasnicki RM, Ali R, Jordan SJ, Atallah L, Leong JJ, Jones GG, Cobb J, Yang GZ, Darzi A. A wearable mobility assessment device for total knee replacement: a longitudinal feasibility study. Int J Surg. 2015;18:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lutzner C, Kirschner S, Lutzner J. Patient activity after TKA depends on patient-specific parameters. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:3933–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Reijman M. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41:576–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vissers MM, de Groot IB, Reijman M, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA. Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallis JA, Webster KE, Levinger P, Taylor NF. What proportion of people with hip and knee osteoarthritis meet physical activity guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21:1648–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wylde V, Bruce J, Beswick A, Elvers K, Gooberman-Hill R. Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65:1795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iben Engelund Luna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Iben Engelund Luna, Henrik Kehlet and Eske Kvanner Aasvang declare no conflict of interest. Barry Petersen is an employee of Phillips that sells the actigraphy device used in the study.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local ethical committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luna, I.E., Peterson, B., Kehlet, H. et al. Individualized assessment of post-arthroplasty recovery by actigraphy: a methodology study. J Clin Monit Comput 31, 1283–1287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9952-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9952-3

Keywords

Navigation