Abstract
Following an episode of reduction in inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) and inhalational agent concentration (Fi agent) during the changing of a soda lime absorber, We conducted an in vitro experiment to understand the impact of disconnection of the absorber on inspired gas dilution at different fresh gas flows. We found that both in Dräger Fabius GS and Primus anaesthesia work stations, disconnection of the absorber caused progressive reduction in FiO2 and Fi agent as the FGF was decreased. The operating principle of fresh gas decoupling (FGD) valve is a potential source of this complication, which must be kept in mind while changing the soda lime during the course of surgery where an anaesthetic work stations utilizing FGD valves are used.
References
Appendix—daily and peruse checkout form. In: Dräger Fabius GS operator’s manual. 3rd ed. Germany: Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG; 2006.
Brockwell CR, Andrews JJ. Inhaled anesthetic delivery systems. In: Miller DR, Eriksson IL, Fleisher AL, Wiener-Kronish PJ, Young LW, editors. Miller’s anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 702–4.
Murphy E, Willis S. Awareness and hypoxia risk with Dräger Cato and Fabius anaesthesia machines. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004;32:721–2.
Roiss M, Bremer K, Schmidt GN. Intraoperative drop in sevoflurane and oxygen concentration. Leakage of the ventilation system. Anesthesist. 2009;58:1226–30.
Conflict of interest
The current work has been done only with institutional resources and none of the authors has received any financial support for the work. None of the authors has any conflict of interest in the material submitted.
Informed Consent
Institutional ethics committee (IEC) written permission obtained for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vinay, B., Gopalakrishna, K.N. & Umamaheswara Rao, G.S. Fall in inspired oxygen and anaesthetic agent concentrations during change of soda lime absorber. J Clin Monit Comput 29, 373–376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9614-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9614-2